|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1942-09-04
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1940-1949
>
1942
>
1942-09-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:29:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Upon motion of Mr. Locke, seconded by Mr. Lombard, it <br />was unanimously voted to grant the hunroe petition in the <br />following form: <br />� I* <br />.37 <br />Mr. Weene said that these houses would not be considered <br />eligible had they been singles, as this is a two-family zone. <br />He said that he was required by the F. H. A. to build a two- <br />family house - either a duplex, or one with an upstairs and <br />a downstairs. The exterior of the house is the same as a <br />single residence, and has a single entrance. The subdivision <br />is in theory, only. <br />The Chairman asked if the lots were to be recorded <br />separately, and Mr. Weene replied in the affirmative. The <br />Chairman said that as soon as they are recorded, they become <br />two separate properties. He asked what would prevent, in <br />the h future, the sale of any one of the smaller sub -divisions <br />with its portion of the house on it. <br />Mr. Weene said that this would be prevented only because <br />of an economic point of view. He said that he had never known <br />of duplex houses being sold in separate units. Post houses <br />of this sort are owned by a corporation, and this is a corp- <br />oration. He is the corporation. He said that he was going <br />to be very particular about the class of people he allowed <br />in the apartments. <br />The Chairman said that if these became separate proper- <br />ties, then they could be sold as individual units. The lots <br />will be definitely sub -divided and recorded. Mr. Weene said <br />that they would be, but with the restriction that one unit <br />would be built on two lots. <br />Mr. Weene said that if his petition was granted, he had <br />a builder ready to go right ahead - he has his materials and <br />labor, etc. <br />The Chairman asked if Mr. Weene would continue to own <br />the houses, and he replied in the affirmative. <br />No other persons appeared in favor of the granting of <br />the petition. <br />Mr. Buttrick asked what would hap)en to the Right of <br />Way near the old Spaulding property, and Mr. Weene said that <br />there was a Right of Way from Spencer Street, but not from <br />Mass. Ave. The Chairman asked Mr. Buttrick if his interest <br />was to find out if the Right of Way was to remain there, <br />and he said that it was. He said it was all right the way <br />it appeared on the plan. The Chairman asked if he had any <br />objection, and he replied in the negative. <br />Mrs. Kennedy and Mrs. Kelley said that they merely were <br />looking for information, and had no objection. <br />No other persons desiring to be heard, the hearing was <br />declared closed at 9:15 P. M. The group retired. <br />Upon motion of Mr. Locke, seconded by Mr. Lombard, it <br />was unanimously voted to grant the hunroe petition in the <br />following form: <br />� I* <br />.37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.