|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1942-09-04
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
1940-1949
>
1942
>
1942-09-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
2/8/2018 12:29:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Author or Source
Zoning Board of Appeals
Department
Zoning Board of Appeals
Keywords or Subject
BA-1 to BA-12, Board of Appeals Minutes, 1929-1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9M <br />At 8:20 P. M. hearing was declared open upon the <br />petition of Frank A. Napoli for a renewal of his permit to <br />maintain the roadside stand on Marrett Road. <br />Mr. Napoli appeared in favor of the granting of the <br />petition. He said that there were no changes. No other <br />persons appearing, the hearing was declared closed at 8:25 <br />P. M. <br />At 8:30 P. M, hearing was declared open upon petition of <br />A. Horace Weene for permission to subdivide six lots located <br />between #977 and #1009 Mass. Ave., Lexington into twelve <br />smaller lots having approximately the same area. <br />Mr. Weene, Mrs. Alice S. Kennedy of 1009 Mass. Ave., <br />Mrs. Margaret Kelley of 17 Spencer Street, and Mr. Edward F. <br />Buttrick of 996 Mass. Ave. were present at the hearing. <br />Mr. Weene said that about one year ago he purchased <br />the land on Massachusetts Avenue between #977 and #1009. <br />After investigating the contour of the land, he found that <br />there was a proposed extension of Spencer Street, and that <br />the parcel was in a two-family zone. He said that it was <br />difficult to put in two-family houses because of the pro- <br />posed street, and the contour of the land. He applied to <br />the Federal Housing Authority for permission to go ahead <br />with a development, and has received an acknowledgment of the <br />application and has been advised that it has been sent to <br />the National Housing Association for approval. Mr. Weene <br />said that the F. H. A. was severe in its restrictions as <br />to where a house shall be built. <br />Mr. Weene said that a two-family house, with one apart- <br />ment above the other, brought to mind tenements. He said that <br />he did not like this type of house, and neither did the <br />F. H. A. The latter suggested a "dwelling unit", which is <br />a one -family house. However, the cost of the land and the <br />utility service would not allow this. The F. H. A. allows <br />only 50' of service for each dwelling unit. The Chairman <br />asked if they would allow more for a house with more area, <br />and Mr. Weene replied in the negative. <br />Mr. Weene said that in building these six houses, it <br />would be at least five years before he got any return on <br />his money. <br />The Chairman asked why it would take less pipe to take <br />care of serving these houses if the lots were split than if <br />they were not split. Mr. Weene said that a main was required; <br />there is no main in the street. Once the eligibility of a <br />house is determined, then it goes from the F. H. A. to the <br />War Production Board. <br />• <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.