|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2006-11-08-CPC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2006-2009
>
2006
>
2006-11-08-CPC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 11:16:35 AM
Creation date
4/17/2009 12:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dick stressed the importance of doing a study, especially given the difficulties crossing <br />Tophet Swamp. The project is complex but the group sponsoring this project has a great <br />track record. <br /> <br />Wendy noted that without CPA funding this project would never get off the ground, and <br />added that she thought it was an appropriate concept for CPA funding. <br /> <br />Betsey suggested that we invite the group in to speak about it. <br /> <br />It was asked if there was federal money to help with construction of the path. <br /> <br />Norm Cohen also asked if the project could be broken into phases. <br /> <br />Betsey asked about the issue of the path going over private property: what happens? It <br />was also asked whether the path goes through wetlands. If so, what happens? <br /> <br />Richard stated that we should not fund projects that the town does not already own. <br /> <br />Carl said the question is answered by what is the ultimate use of the property: i.e., is it <br />used by townspeople? Who is the legal entity that would sign the contract? <br /> <br />Sandy Shaw said that if Recreation and the Conservation Commission sign on to this <br />project and the project has citizen participation, then that should be enough. <br /> <br />Dick suggested that this could be a joint project among the sponsors, the Recreation <br />Committee and the Conservation Commission. <br /> <br />Sandy said that if the CPC is interested in this project, we should move to support it. <br />Sandy and Dick will discuss with the project proponents. We must do a study! <br /> <br />8. Discussion of Burial Grounds Project <br /> <br />Marilyn noted that the burial grounds are in terrible shape and that two appraisals have <br />been completed, a comprehensive study commissioned by the Lexington Historical <br />Society in 1994 and an update in 2004 by the firm that conserved the obelisk on the <br />Lexington Green. The DPW, Historical Commission and Historical Society have joined <br />to sponsor this application for CPA funding. <br /> <br />Richard asked whether the proposal included Munroe Cemetery; it does. It does not <br />include Robbins Cemetery, however, as that burying ground is believed to be in better <br />condition. <br /> <br />There was concern about the amount of funds to be used to repair the storage shed. Joel <br />wondered what was stored in the sheds (equipment). Norm wondered whether repairs to <br />the shed could come from the Trust Fund. <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.