Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
2. Discussion of CPA Flow Chart <br /> <br />Carl presented a flow chart showing sources and uses of CPA funds during the next four <br />fiscal years, giving examples of how the funds could be allocated. He noted that any <br />excess funds allocated to projects are returned to the CPA coffers. <br /> <br />3. Discussion of Center Playfields – Drainage Project <br /> <br />It was asked whether an RFP had been issued and any bids received. <br /> <br />Dick wondered whether other funds were available to apply to this project, such as the <br />Recreation Enterprise Fund. Carl said that he would need to do some research to see if <br />this project would qualify. <br /> <br />Richard asked whether the cost could vary widely – what would happen if costs escalate? <br />Should we get an estimate of the costs before we approve of the project? <br /> <br />Betsey said that she would call Dave Pinsonneault (the project sponsor) and let him know <br />we have project questions, prior to the public hearing next month. <br /> <br />4. Discussion of Cary Hall Lintels Project <br /> <br />It was decided that we need to know more about this project. Does it qualify for CPA <br />funds? Is it a maintenance item? <br /> <br />5. Discussion of upgrades to systems at Cary Hall Project <br /> <br />Wendy Manz said that she supports this project, but suggested we fund only the project <br />studies (budget items 16 (Design Comprehensive Plan and Documents, $35,000) and 18 <br />(Evaluation and Plan for Building Upgrades, Phase II, $25,000)) at this time. This <br />request would allow Cary Hall to have concerts and performances that are now taking <br />place elsewhere and could bring potential revenues into the Center, such as restaurant <br />patronage, etc. <br /> <br />6. Discussion of Greeley Village Window Replacement Project <br /> <br />The Lexington Housing Authority is asking for $240,000 over two years to replace the <br />windows. Does this qualify for CPA funding? <br /> <br />Marilyn Fenollosa read the CPA statute: this would probably constitute “preservation”, <br />“protection of personal or real property from injury, harm or destruction, but not <br />including maintenance.” <br /> <br />7. Discussion of Greenway Corridor Project <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> <br />