Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee Meeting <br />Maria Hastings Elementary School Building Project <br />SBC MEETING MINUTES <br />DATE OF MEETING: <br />June 28, 2017 at 7:30P.M. at 201 Bedford Street, Lexington MA <br />PROJECT: <br />Maria Hastings Elementary School Building Project <br />Dore & Whittier Project #MP16-0112 <br />SUBJECT: <br />School Building Committee Meeting (D&W#12) <br />ATTENDING: <br />Curt Barrentine Lexington PBC <br />Charles Favazzo Lexington PBC <br />Howard Hobbs Lexington PBC <br />Phil Colemen Lexington PBC <br />Andrew Clarke Lexington PBC <br />Peter Johnson Lexington PBC (via phone) <br />Pat Goddard Lexington DPF <br />Mark Barrett Lexington DPF <br />Trip Elmore DWMP <br />Donna DiNisco DiNisco Design <br />Ken DiNisco DiNisco Design <br />Vivian Low DiNisco Design <br />Kate Colburn School Committee Liason <br />Hasting portion of the meeting started at 7:42 <br />1. Update on the Schematic Design submission to the MSBA <br />a. The Design team has completed the Schematic Design Binders, and has three copies <br />available to the town of Lexington in the meeting. The OPM was asked to post an electronic <br />copy on the project web site. A paper copy will be available at the Public Buildings office for <br />anyone who wishes to review a paper copy. <br />Review of Project Design and changes to the building and site location. <br />a. DiNisco Design presented the updates via the attached Presentation: (over view of the <br />presentation) In the process of evaluating the building and its placement on the site during <br />the Schematic Design submission process, the design team has explored an option to <br />straighten the building and move it away from the northern lot line to reduce the site costs <br />associated with walls, ledge, and slope mitigation measures. This will impact the ideal north <br />south orientation; however, it fits in a better way on the site with these changes and should <br />result in significant site -work cost savings. This will also remove a 9 foot wall along the <br />wetland area and reduce any Conservation Commission concerns. As this is a relatively new <br />idea, it will take time to explore and prove out the benefits of this revision. Several variables <br />are still in concept stage; however a sketch of the concept was shown. A concern raised by <br />the School, as the concept was shared with them yesterday, was that the size of the <br />playground may be compromised. As the Design Development process is beginning, these <br />new details will be developed in further detail if the SBC/PBC members agree that these <br />ideas are worth pursuing. The SBC/PBC members collectively agreed ( all in favor) that the <br />ideas were worth pursuing as long as the concerns about the size of the playground were <br />worked out. <br />Other topics. <br />a. The OPM informed the SBC that we were now beginning the Design Development phase. <br />Hastings portion of the meeting ended at 8:30. <br />IAN1° GtIMENT <br />PAIS"I'NERS, [,LC <br />I'ItOJEC:T MANAGERS <br />RS <br />AR IB'ITEC,T'S <br />Nr;ur,hRn-vpoi`r„ MA ON'90 <br />160 herrn wwHtry w IlMg '7 <br />978.499. 999 ph <br />978,499.2944 'flwry <br />www.doren dwhlwittier.c.orn <br />