2017-03-09-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Motion to keep the members of the CM Selection Committee the same for the proposal evaluation phase, with the addition of Louise Lipsitz by C. Favazzo, 2nd by C. Oldenburg. VOTE: Unanimous to approve. 4. Designer Updates: D. DiNisco spoke to their presentation, updating the committee on the most recent design evolvements, sustainability decisions and schedule (presentation attached). She pointed out that many stakeholders felt strongly about an all -electric geothermal system, which the School Committee agreed; DiNisco is currently working these design decisions into the design of the building. Additionally, she said that the project team had met with the MSBA in February prior to Lexington's invite to the Schematic Design (SD) Phase for the MHES Project; the meeting went well, and the invite occurred when anticipated, keeping the project on schedule for the SD submission at the end of June, 2017, and a winter 2020 occupancy. 5. Upcoming Meetings & Public Forums: a. Scheduled meetings — i. TBD 2017 — PBC Meeting 6. Hastings Discussion adjourned at 8:25 PM — Minutes provided by R. Milaschewski, Dore & Whittier management Partners 7. BOS Sustainability Policy Discussion Pat Goddard distributed four documents for review and discussion • The Stakeholders Integrated spreadsheet with final stakeholder input that was discussed at the joint BOS SC meeting on 2-27-17. • A draft of the 2005 BOS Sustainable design Policy updated by Pat Goddard to include the 3 out takes for the 2-27-17 mtg. • A draft of the 2005 BOS Sustainable design policy updated by the Sustainable Lexington Committee. • An updated draft of the 2005 BOS Sustainable design policy updated by the Sustainable Lexington Committee. Pat briefly updated the PBC on the discussion points at the 2-27-17 BOS/SC meeting with regard to the stakeholders Input Table and the three issues from that table that were acted upon. Hastings project would have level 4 building resiliency not level 3. Hastings project would employ an all -electric HVAC model utilizing geothermal wells. Hastings project would not require 30% increase in ventilation to reduce CO2 ppm, but distribution modifications to enhance dilution of CO2 perhaps 10% better than Estabrook. The purpose behind the draft policy update was to formally update the 2005 Policy based upon the past two integrated design processes that have been followed for the Clarke & Diamond Project and the Hastings Project, with very similar outcomes. There was discussion on the specifics of some of the draft update language. It was noted that there was not a quorum of the core PBC committee and that this particular issue needs to be discussed by the core committee so in-depth discussion at tonight's meeting should be deferred until the core PBC had a quorum. It was agreed to continue this discussion at another meeting. 2