APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE-ATM 2017
<br /> Article 6: Appropriate for Senior Services Program
<br /> Funds Requested Funding Source Committee Recommendation
<br /> $30,000 GF Approve (9-0)
<br /> This article requests an appropriation for the Town's Senior Service Program of$30,000. This amount is lev-
<br /> el-funded from the FY2017 request. With the continuation of a trend of steadily declining participation in the
<br /> program, appropriation at this level has proved more than sufficient to meet the program's needs this year, and
<br /> there is also a substantial projected carryover balance at the end of the fiscal year of approximately $41,000.
<br /> However, in view of plans by the Board of Selectmen, following the 2017 Annual Town Meeting, to consider
<br /> relaxation of eligibility requirements and enhancements in the wage rate and total amount of credits which can
<br /> be earned in FY2018, appropriation of the full$30,000 requested is recommended.
<br /> The Senior Service Program
<br /> Since 2006, the Town has operated its own Senior Service Program, which allows low to moderate income
<br /> seniors (age 60 and over) to perform volunteer work for the Town in exchange for a reduction in their proper-
<br /> ty tax. The Town adopted this program, in substitution for a similar program previously operated under G.L.
<br /> c. 59, § 5K, to allow it more flexibility in setting the age criteria for participation, the wage rate, and the total
<br /> amount of credit allowed.
<br /> For more information on the Senior Service Program and other property tax relief options available to seniors,
<br /> including exemptions and opportunities for deferral,please refer to Appendix D.
<br /> Benefits and Criteria for Participation
<br /> Current income eligibility criteria are set forth in Appendix D. Participants may receive property tax reduc-
<br /> tions under this program in addition to any other exemption for which they qualify, such as the $1,000 Clause
<br /> 41C exemption, and may also defer the balance of their taxes under Clause 41A if they are eligible to do so.
<br /> The maximum amount of the tax reduction that may be earned, under guidelines established by the Selectmen
<br /> and amended in July 2014, is $1,045/year (110 hours at $9.50 per hour) for an individual and $1,330/year
<br /> (140 hours at $9.50 per hour) for a two-person household toward their property tax bills. It should be noted
<br /> that the State legislature recently amended G.L. c. 59, §5K, in which the Town no longer participates, to in-
<br /> crease the limit of earnable credits from $1,000 to $1,500.
<br /> Funding Requirements and Requested Appropriation
<br /> The program operates as a continuing balance account, and unexpended funds carry over from year to year.
<br /> When first established in FY2007, the program was funded at $25,000, an amount slightly higher than the av-
<br /> erage annual amount that had been expended from an overlay account under the pre-existing §5K program
<br /> during the 2004-2006 fiscal years. In anticipation of higher usage, the annual appropriation was subsequently
<br /> increased over time from $36,000 in FY2007 to $45,000 in FY2010.
<br /> This level of funding, however,proved to be more than required to allow the Town to admit all eligible appli-
<br /> cants who wished to participate in the program. Although the wage level was increased from $8.50 to $9.50 in
<br /> FY2014, and income thresholds have also been increased, participation has steadily declined from a high of
<br /> 34 in FY2007-2008 to 23 in FY2015-2016, to just 16 in FY2017, a decrease of over 50%.
<br /> To encourage greater participation in this worthy program, this Committee encourages the Selectmen, as it has
<br /> in past years, to increase the wage rate (currently beneath the State's minimum wage rate of$11 per hour),
<br /> raise the maximum allowed hours and total credit which may be earned to at least match that allowed under
<br /> the State law, and/or relax the economic eligibility criteria for participants.
<br /> The Committee recommends approval of this request(9-0).
<br /> 22
<br />
|