Laserfiche WebLink
Motion to approve the appointment of the designer selection Committee for Public Safety <br />Buildings. <br />Motion 2nd and APPROVED. <br />• DPF informed the committee that five architect firms showed up for the walk through for Police & <br />Fire on 10/11/16. <br />• PBC asked what exactly the Police /Fire project is. <br />• DFP informed the committee there are a couple of scenarios; <br />o Each building is approximately a $19,000,000 project. <br />o Purchase of the Liberty Mutual Building to renovate, and then move the Fire Department <br />there on a temporary basis, while Fire HQ is torn down and rebuilt. <br />o Police could stay at their current location after renovations or Liberty Mutual Building <br />could be a temp police Building or a permanent new Police HQ. <br />• PBC asked why not tear down the Liberty Mutual Building and build a new Fire Station there. <br />• DPF discussed prior location studies and that the present site was superior to fire Department <br />response to the town. <br />• PBC asked if the East Fire House will be eliminated — NO. <br />• PBC commented they feel the program needs to be analyzed better. Donham & Sweeney did <br />not include East Lexington Fire in the study. <br />• There was a discussion on the timing of the Fire project and the school project (Hastings) and <br />how they relate to each other and a special town meeting. <br />• DPF stated that we might have an answer by the November 10th PBC meeting for when the vote <br />for debt exclusion might be. <br />• PBC asked about the Armenian School and if it was still being considered for purchase <br />• DPF stated the town is still looking at that building and perhaps the Lexington Children's Place <br />was a possible use. <br />4. Remote Access — Board of Selectman (BOS) Policy <br />• DPF distributed copies of the Board of Selectmen Policy for review. <br />• The committee agreed that if a PBC member is not available to attend a meeting, it would be <br />beneficial if they could still participate via a conference call. <br />• Discussion ensued including the idea that remote participation be available at every meeting and <br />references to the policy requiring advance approval of its use and the BOS desire that it be an <br />infrequent event. <br />• DPF will inquire with IT department on needs for setting up the proper equipment. <br />Motion to adjourn was made and seconded: Meeting adjourned at 9:OOpm. <br />PBC Meeting 10.13.16 3 <br />