Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of October 23, 1989 2 <br /> 257. Royal Circle, Barry Caouette, Endorsement of Plans: Mr. Bowyer reported <br /> Town Counsel has about completed his review of the covenant, and the plans are <br /> ready to be endorsed. On the motion of Mrs. Klauminzer, seconded by Mr. <br /> Williams, it was voted 4-0 to endorse the plans for Royal Circle Subdivision, <br /> with the stipulation that the plans will not be recorded until the covenant is <br /> found acceptable to the Town Counsel. <br /> *************************** AFFORDABLE HOUSING ****************************** <br /> 258. Comprehensive Permit Procedure <br /> a. Amend Definition of Affordable Housing: The Board reviewed proposed <br /> changes in the "Comprehensive Plan Definition of Households with Incomes <br /> Qualifying for Affordable Housing" that would use the same ranges of income <br /> that EOCD uses. Mr. Bowyer noted that the differences between the present <br /> definition and the revised definition is found in the Upper Moderate and <br /> Middle Income incomes, where the upper range of the percentages are revised to <br /> 110% and 125% respectively, compared to the 1985-1988 definition where the <br /> upper range of the percentages are 120% and 150% respectively of the Boston <br /> SMSA median income. <br /> Mr. Bowyer reported the top of the range which EOCD uses to determine eligibi- <br /> lity would be 110% of the Boston SMSA median income. He proposed a figure for <br /> Middle Income above the 110%, since there may be some merit in retaining this <br /> category for use in Lexington situations only, but he suggested the range only <br /> go to 125% of the median income rather than 150% in the current definition. <br /> He noted the 1989 median income for a family of four is $45,000, and the <br /> ranges for the 1985-1988 definition and the proposed revised definition are <br /> both based on this figure. <br /> Mrs. Klauminzer questioned whether the range needed to include the Middle <br /> Income category since many had questioned why the Town considered providing <br /> housing for anyone with incomes that high. She added it appeared to extend <br /> benefits to persons who do not really need them. The Board discussed whether <br /> to include the Middle Income category in the definition, and agreed to delete <br /> it since the State does not accept anyone with that income as part of a state <br /> program. <br /> On the motion of Mrs. Klauminzer, seconded by Mrs. Uhrig, it was voted <br /> unanimously to: (1) approve a new "Comprehensive Plan Definition of House- <br /> holds with Incomes Qualifying for Affordable Housing" with new ranges of <br /> income in relation to the median income for the Boston SMSA, and (2) delete <br /> the Middle Income range category from the definition since it is not consis- <br /> tent with State programs and is no longer consistent with the town's housing <br /> needs. <br /> b. Discussion of Proposed New Regulations Concerning M.G.L. Chapter 40B: Mr. <br /> Bowyer reported he is in the process of preparing an explanation of these <br /> regulations, and that the Board may wish to postpone this discussion until the <br /> explanation is completed. He pointed out some sections that he thought the <br /> Board might wish to make recommendations for amendment of the draft regula- <br /> tions. He noted the certification period was down to two years, with a <br /> recertification period of one year, and he questioned whether this period was <br /> long enough for towns to do any effective preparation of housing plans. <br />