2016-02-11-PBC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• It was also found that the design will meet capacity. • DPF handed out the Peer Report to the PBC Committee. • PBC asked for further information on the 2 items of concern. • DPF stated the 2 items regarded Clarke: 1. If TLP was moved from the 2nd floor to the 1St, there would be a potential savings of about $14,000, but the Principal had educational reasons for it to stay. 2. Bring Art up to the 2nd floor to reduce the amount of work in the Music Department. • PBC questioned why they had not seen the Peer Report ahead of time, and DPF stated Jon Himmel was PBC representative in all the meetings. • PBC asked if Jon had any concerns with the report. • It was stated that there were no open items /concerns other than the next time it should be done earlier in the process. • A copy of the report was available on the multiple projects website. 4. Overview and Discussion of the Schedule • March 7th Estimate due from the town. • DiNisco outlined that the Diamond's schedule goes out further due to the fact this project will take longer. • The next mile stone is a week from this Friday (2/12/16), which will be for documents for pricing to meet the 3/7 estimate date. • DiNisco informed PBC he is meeting with Building Officials in advance of the permit to review project specifics, we will be permitting under the current code before a new edition is released later in 2016. • May 3rd is the referendum vote. • The bid documents for the end the Summer Work should be available at the end of March. • Hill stated that the locker rooms work is a separate package along with early site work. The construction for the locker rooms should start early May if all goes well, and then site work starts at the close of school in June. • An overall phasing schedule should be developed and shared with the group. • PBC asked Bond if his schedule has the "Summer Slammer" work, and Bond responded that it does. 5. Aesthetics / Designs • PBC inquired about the design, colors and materials being used for Clarke and Diamond. • DiNisco stated that restraints from the existing building and budget have an effect on the design. • PBC asked if there is time for them to be involved with color selections and Bond answered Yes • PBC asked if they could see the design or some images. It was discussed to set up a time when some members of the PBC could meet with the architects to review in more detail the materials, samples, color schemes and general design options. It was agreed that such a meeting should be organized. • DiNisco will have a PowerPoint presentation for the next PBC meeting scheduled for Monday March 7th at 6:OOpm. • PBC (Ned) commented he was excited about the court yard at Diamond and asked how this will be designed. DiNisco responded the courtyard will be kept simple to easily care for it. • PBC asked to be sure on future projects that time for design review with the PBC is built into the project schedule so it can be at a time that affords the PBC to have more of an impact on the projects. PCB Meeting 02.11.16 Page 2