Minutes 2014-09-10.pdf - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Additional points made included that the new configuration presents broader possibilities and exposure to 21st century concepts,as well as integrating new space and resources to evolve the programs; the fact that the building needs to be fixed,and that there are the pressures of size. Hearing the good things about Minuteman was appreciated,as was hearing about the need for people to be agile workers in a changing environment that offers a variety of experiences. To a large audience,it was pointed out that it was a pleasure to hear about the success of students. A member urged people to talk to their friends and neighbors and tell them about Minuteman. An opinion was offered that instead of the funds offered earlier,it would be more valuable if people walked into Board of Selectemen meetings and expressed support for Minuteman. In response to a specific question about whether teachers in the Welding program were involved in the decision-making process, the Superintendent explained that they were not involved,as the decision involved him and his team over the summer. In response to questions about MSBA's role in the Education Plan and funding for equipment, the Superintendent explained that they did not determine the Education Program Plan,and that the line item for furniture,fixtures,and equipment(FF&E) is a component of all MSBA projects,and is never adequate. The Task Force Chair pointed out that programming decisions are not easy ones,and he appreciates the heartfelt sentiments expressed. He pointed out that a choice has to be made,and there are many who could fill the room,specifically a group of supporters of programs that are up for consideration,or taxpayers in member towns. He noted that there is a huge cadre of people who wonder why they should shoulder the cost of educating a high school student outside of the district. He also pointed out that after the Task Force looked at enrollment data that reflects trends,he had voted for the substitute motion,and abstained from the vote on the program plan. The member from Lincoln was thrilled to see the outpouring of commitment to Minuteman education. He urged looking at things more optimistically,and highlighted recent action in Advanced Manufacturing,interest in vocational technical schools,the development of frameworks, and real money coming from industry to support this perspective. The member from Dover reiterated that forward thinking is needed,and he referred to the Tesla factory for a view of the process in engineering robotics and the development of education reform as additional positive developments. A motion was made(Castagno)to move the question. The Chair explained that a 2/3 (11 members) majority vote is needed for this to happen,and the following vote was taken: ACTION 2014#86 Moved(Castagno) To move the question and end debate Vote: 12 in favor, 1 opposed,3 abstentions(with 16 members present) The vote on the main motion was then taken as follows: ACTION 2014#87 Moved(Spalding)and seconded(DeLuca) To accept the Education Program Plan as presented by the Superintendent and as recommended by the Education Program Plan Task Force Vote: 10 in favor, 5 opposed, 1 abstention(with 16 members present) The list of 16 programs recommended and approved is found as Attachment D. 4. ADJOURNMENT 6