|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2021-05-24-CONCOM-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Conservation Commission-ConCom
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-05-24-CONCOM-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2021 9:35:40 AM
Creation date
6/24/2021 9:35:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lawn area and convert to a naturalized planting area with shrubs, natives, and groundcover <br /> plants. <br /> Questions and Comments from the Commission: <br /> — What is the plan to minimize the impact to the large trees adjacent to the bikeway? <br /> — Is there a replanting plan for the area? <br /> — Concerned about the necessity for a turnaround area of the driveway within the 50-foot <br /> buffer zone since there is little traffic on Hancock Street, as well as the necessity for the <br /> walkway behind the garage to the proposed deck. <br /> — Request that the turnaround driveway area be removed or made of pervious pavement to <br /> provide air and water to the tree in close proximity. <br /> — Is there crushed stone in the drainage ditch? <br /> — Is there a plan to create a wetland or let the water flow out of the area? <br /> — Check that the roof overhang is included in the calculations as it doesn't appear so on the <br /> plans provided. <br /> Responses from the Representative: <br /> — Perhaps a certified arborist could be hired to ensure the work is being done to the best <br /> extent in terms of tree protection. <br /> — Anticipate the area to be replanted but it is up to the property owner or a creative <br /> landscape designer. <br /> — There were many cars parked on the street during the site visits. <br /> — It appears that the previous owners put a pvc pipe in the bed of crushed stone and that's <br /> what the drainage area in the back is connected to. <br /> — The area will always be wet but removing the berm may relieve some of the ponding. Not <br /> intending to drain the wetland. <br /> Ms. Ladd asked about the drain inlet between the driveway and the house and Mr. Kirby <br /> responded that he will provide more information at the next meeting and that the Historic <br /> Commission prefers no gutters on the left side of the house that abuts the Minuteman Bikeway. <br /> Ms. Katherine McCarey, abutter and property owner of 11 Brigham Road, asked questions about <br /> the restoration area to the rear of the property. Responding to her questions, Mr. Kirby stated that <br /> the black gum tree would generally (over many decades) become just as tall as the other trees in <br /> the area. Mr. Kirby also stated that there shouldn't be any expansion or significant spread of the <br /> Bulrush mixture beyond the restoration area. Also,there is no disruption in the ditch between the <br /> properties being proposed. <br /> Ms. Emily Patel, abutter and property owner of 11 Hancock Avenue, stated that she supports the <br /> proposal and the efforts of restoration by the property owners. <br /> On a motion by Mr. Beuttell and seconded by Mr. Langseth, the Commission voted 7-0 by roll <br /> call vote to continue the hearing to the June 7, 2021 meeting at the applicant's request. <br /> Record of vote as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.