Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/19/15 AC Minutes <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />November19, 2015 <br />: Town OfficeBuilding, Selectmen’s MeetingRoom,7:30p.m. <br />: Glenn Parker, Chair; John Bartenstein, Vice Chair and Secretary; Kate Colburn; <br />Alan Levine;Beth Masterman;Richard Neumeier;Rob Addelson (non-voting, ex officio) <br />Members Absent:Mollie Garberg; Eric Michelson; Andrei Radulescu-Banu <br />Others Present: Margaret Coppe, School Committee; Elaine Ashton, Town Meeting member <br />The meetingwas calledto order at 7:39p.m. <br />Minutes: <br />1.A motion was made and seconded to accept the minutes for November 5, 2015, <br />as amended. The motion passed. Vote: 6-0 <br />Major Town Capital Projects and Related Financing Plans: <br />2.Mr. Parker reported that <br />key staff members have been working with the chairs plus one member from critical committees in <br />an effort to define an educationally acceptable and financially responsible approach to addressing <br />the school capacity issues and thebuilding deficiencies that exist in some of the schoolfacilities. <br />There wasgeneral agreementamong those in this working groupthat a capital plan for an amount <br />over $200million to replace and/or upgrade schools and public safety facilitieswould be considered <br />unpalatablebythe taxpayer. <br />Ms. Coppe shared financial data that identifies a $147,298,000 capital plan that provides relief for <br />the most immediate demands in the schools butcompromises some of the school system’s goals for <br />the optimal education environmentand does notfullyaddress potential long-term continued <br />enrollment growth.The School Committee is unanimously supporting this plan. The School <br />Committee is also hiring a consultant to assist in developing redistricting plans for September 2016 <br />that will maximize the use of existing space. <br />There was discussion about the tradeoffs and specifics associated with the proposaland the <br />procedural sequencing. Mr. Addelson reported that he is building a new financial model based on <br />the School Committee’s recommendations. <br />It was noted that this proposal includes funding to upgrade the heating, ventilation,and air <br />conditioning systems at Diamond Middle School and Lexington High School. This proposal also <br />includes the rebuilding of Hastings Elementary School (Hastings). Ms. Colburn suggested that if <br />the Town purchases property on Pelham Road, as is now anticipated, the school capacity shortfall <br />might be better addressed by building a new school on Pelham Road and postponing the Hastings <br />project. After discussion, it was generally agreed that this approach might be considered if the <br />Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) rejects Lexington’s request forfinancial <br />assistance, but the Hastings facility has significant building deficiencies and the Town has been <br />pursuing MSBA assistance for Hastings for two years. MSBA will likely providea preliminary <br />indication of its interest in the Hastings projectbyearly 2016. <br />1 <br /> <br />