Laserfiche WebLink
Permanent Building Committee <br />Town of Lexington <br />201 Bedford Street, Room 221 <br />Lexington, MA 02420 <br />August 13, 2015, 7:00 p.m. <br />Present: Jon Himmel, Chairman, Eric Brown, Vice - Chairman, Peter Johnson, Dick Perry, Carl <br />Oldenburg, Lee Noel Chase, Bill Hurley <br />Absent: Charles Favazzo, Philip Coleman <br />Guests: Dave Billings and Kerry Logue, Hill International; Ken DiNisco and Donna DiNisco, DiNisco <br />Design Partnership; Judy Crocker, School Committee Liaison, David Kanter, Capital Expenditures <br />Committee substitute liaison <br />Lexington DPF: Patrick Goddard, Director of Public Facilities and Mark Barrett, RA Project Manager <br />The Minutes were taken by Jean Curran, Recording Secretary <br />Jon Himmel called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br />1. General Business <br />• Jon Himmel and Mark Barrett discussed the edits to the minutes. Members then reviewed the <br />Minutes dated July 9, 2015. <br />• Motion to Approve Meeting Minutes dated July 9, 2015 <br />Motion: Eric 2nd Dick Vote: 5 -0 -0 <br />2. Master Plan Multiple School Projects Update <br />• Pat Goddard expressed two needs for tonight, (i) to have Ken DiNisco review talking points on <br />projects for discussion on impact of recent Board of Selectmen (BOS) vote, and (ii) committee's <br />input in selecting CM at risk selection committee members <br />• Ken DiNisco reviewed talking points on each project with discussion related to (i) BOS Vote <br />release of funds, (ii) Project schedules and (iii) project costs <br />• DPF: We are looking for input from the PBC on timelines and sequencing of project tasks as it <br />relates to the phases of the project and funding request needs. <br />• Question: what will we have at end of Hastings study ? <br />• Mr. DiNisco shared that there would be a completed feasibility study with preferred options, <br />costs & time schedule reflecting programmatic needs at the end of December. This <br />document can be turned into MSBA format or can be used on our own if the town decides to <br />go without MSBA participation. If town goes on without MSBA, the immediate next step is <br />schematic design; and town to be able to move forward immediately at end of December <br />• Jon Himmel asked if project were to become a MSBA project what would be the next steps. <br />• Mr. DiNisco responded that the study would go to the MSBA to be reviewed and accepted. <br />The MSBA would require that the Town go through the standard MSBA architect & OPM <br />selection process. <br />• Fiske Approved Option — 12,000 gsf Brick & Mortar Addition, & 8,200 sf renovation, <br />$9,064,000 project cost and completion August 2017. SC / BOS asked if additional classrooms <br />could be added without expanding support spaces. Also the issue of enlarging or relocating the <br />Cafeteria was still to be determined. <br />• Question asked if it was MSBA guidelines that would require additional core space for 27 <br />classrooms over 24, or is this town policy. Bill Hurley responded that the issue might well be <br />driven by school committee policies or by teacher contracts, not regulations. <br />PBC Meeting 081315 Page 1 <br />