|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2010-11-09-PBC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Permanent Building Committee-PBC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
2010-11-09-PBC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 1:59:35 PM
Creation date
4/17/2015 1:33:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PBC - Permanent Building Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />09 November 2010 Meeting <br />Considerproportionsandscale <br />FireStationdiscussionsincluded: <br />Themeetingconfirmedthattherenovation/additionoptiondidnotmakesenseifthedesignincludedspacenotneeded. <br />Thereelevationsweremoredevelopedthanthepolicedesigns. <br />Onepersonsuggestedreplicatingthe2formsofthepresentapparatusportionofthebuildingandplacingthe2gabled <br />elementssidebyside. <br />OneortwopeoplereferredagaintotheBelmontFireStationsdesignsassomethingthatwasmoreappropriatethanwhat <br />wasbeingshown. <br />TherewasconsensusthatthesitewasverywelllocatedintermsofresponsetimeandoptimalcoveragefortheTown. <br />Therewasdiscussionforconcernoversufficientspaceforapparatusmovement,especiallywiththerenovationdesign. <br />Itwasdiscussedthatthepoliceandfiredesignsdonotneedtobelinked,thefirestationcanstandonitsown. <br />Discussionovertheoptionofanallnewstructure,i.e.thedemolitionoftheexistingbuilding,wasnotmetwith <br />admonishment,moreoveritappearedthatpeoplewereopentofurtherdiscussion. <br />Usemodelingsoftwaretoshowthebuildingin3dimensions <br />Existingbuildingisnotcurrentlyplannedtobeseismicallyupgraded <br />Newconstructionshouldreadasnew;honortheexistingbuildingķƚƓƷmimicit. <br />7/13/10 <br />MotiontoadditionalservicespaymenttoD&Sintheamountof$2,198.75forcorrectiontoexistingconditions/basedrawingsfrom <br />priorstudy. <br />Motion:DickPerry2nd:EricBrownVote:unam. <br />5.10ReviewofDonham&SweeneyPowerPointPresentation <br />8/10/10 <br />ReviewofDonham&SweeneyPowerPointPresentation. <br />PBCdiscussedpresentationmadesuggestionsforformatofpresentation.Nofinaldecisionsweremadeonwhether <br />thisdocumentorportionsthereofshouldserveasthebasisofthepresentationtotheSelectmen. <br />Commentstopowerpoint <br />Addcost/sftoprojectcostsheetandmovetoendofslides. <br />46Bedfordstreetvaluationshouldread$2,500,000 <br />Identifythatestimatesdonotincludefiringrange <br />Removereferencetooverridevote <br />Deficienciesnotspecificenoughandneedstobemovedforwardinthepresentation. <br />Maywanttoaddreferencetostaffinglevelswhenbuildingwasbuilt. <br />Aerialsneededforpoliceupgrademodelstoleveloffire. <br />NeedConclusionssection <br />ZoningAnalysisΑacompilationofzoningrequirementsneedstohaveparkingcalcsincluded. <br />5.11Writtenreport/hardcopy <br />8/10/10 <br />Itwasstatedthatthefinalsubmissionofthisstudywouldbeintheformofafinalwrittendocument/manual. <br />Further,thatasubmissionshouldbemadeconstitutingaprogresssubmissionforthisfinaldocumentasportionsofthe <br />manualwilllikelybeneededforasubmittaltotheselectmen. <br />5.12PrepforBOSProgressReportpresentation <br />9/14/10 <br />a.ThecurrentPowerpointpresentationwasreviewedwiththepurposetoreducetheoverallsizefortheBOS <br />presentationscheduledfor10410.Eachofthe46pageswerereviewedandcommentedonwithapproximately20 <br />pagesproposedforremoval,andotherswithrecommendededits.Copyonfile. <br />Page 10 of 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.