Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF SELECTMEN <br />an interruption in a long upward climb or whether it <br />suggests a stability or even the beginning of a rever- <br />sal must await passage of time. A continuing decline <br />of the past growth pattern would have significant <br />implications. <br />SOME OMINOUS POSSIBILITIES <br />Solid waste disposal is far and away Lexington's <br />largest current operating problem. Pressures from the <br />commonwealth to close the sanitary landfill are in- <br />creasing constantly because of non - conformity to en- <br />vironmental standards. The whole technology of solid <br />waste disposal is still in an undeveloped, experimen- <br />tal state. Although the board of selectmen recognize <br />the need for correction it has hoped that the action <br />could be postponed until more effective disposal <br />methods could be tested and established. At issue is <br />whether the town should abandon a sanitary landfill <br />annually costing $150,000 to operate in favor of still <br />unproved techniques possibly costing $600,000 annually. <br />The need of making such a choice is more than a cloud <br />in the sky. It is a distinct probability. <br />A second ominous consideration is the apprehen- <br />sion we feel that the current dishevelled budgetary <br />problems of the commonwealth may result in diminished <br />state aid to towns and cities. At this state we can <br />only speculate. If we should experience the combined <br />leverage of reduced state aid and a compulsory solid <br />waste disposal program, all of it in addition to in- <br />flationary costs generally, the effect would be a <br />severe increase in the tax rate. <br />This brings us to an observation about priorities. <br />Lexington in 1976 will have many requests to expand <br />its service to its citizens. Most of these requests <br />will be desirable in their way and would make Lexington <br />an even nicer town. That, though, is only part of the <br />question. We must sternly balance our desires with <br />ability to pay. We must consider each proposal in <br />the light of how it fits into the total needs of the <br />town. Lexington, we confidently expect, will main- <br />tain fiscal policies which will enable it to maintain <br />its cherished Triple A rating. But we point out that <br />discipline will be necessary to all levels of govern- <br />ment together with determined resistance to projects <br />where expense does not equate with high priority of <br />need. <br />The dedication to his responsibilities of Town <br />Manager Walter C. O'Connell has been outstanding. We <br />are conscious that his effective execution of board <br />policies has contributed very materially to the town's <br />well being. We are fortunate indeed to have him as a <br />cornerstone of our official family. <br />Lastly, 1975 has been a year characterized by <br />singularly fine service by town employees particularly <br />those involved in the bicentennial. And, as always, <br />the town boards, officers, committees and commissions <br />have been generous and effective beyond words in their <br />discharge of their responsibilities. We wish there <br />7 <br />Lofty Refurbishing <br />