2014-08-18 CONCOM-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Present for the Applicant: Rich Kirby, LEC Environmental Consultants, Mike Novak, Meridian Associates, and Gary Larson, Landscape Architect Mr. Kirby explained the revised plan and modification to the operations and maintenance plan. Comments from the Commission as follows: Mr. Bitsko asked for ½ size plan sets for submittal and commented on the thoroughness of the operations and maintenance plan. Motion made and seconded to close the hearing to, 5-0 in favor. Motion made and seconded to issue an Order of Conditions for 24 Lincoln Street, DEP# 201-948, BL 906, 5-0 in favor. 7:34 pm Cont. Hearing – 40 Ingleside Road, NOI DEP# 201-947, BL 905 Applicant: Joseph Simon Construction of a garage addition and expansion of an existing driveway within the 200-foot Riverfront Area Present for the Applicant: Rich Kirby, LEC Environmental Consultants Mr. Kirby explained the revised plan and updated operations and maintenance plan. Comments from the Commission as follows: Mr. Bitsko suggested use of the wording for sediment removal from the operations and maintenance plan submitted for 24 Lincoln Street. Motion made and seconded to close the hearing, 5-0 in favor. 7:43 pm Cont. Hearing – 66 Munroe Road, NOI DEP# 201-946, BL 904 Applicant: Ying Chen Raze and rebuild a single-family dwelling and paved driveway within the 100- foot Buffer Zone to Bordering Vegetated Wetland Present for the Applicant: Rich Kirby, LEC Environmental Consultants and Ying Chen, Homeowner Mr. Kirby presented the revised plan and explained the proposed work versus the existing conditions. The shed will be removed from the 25-foot buffer zone. Comments from the Commission as follows: Ms. Miller read the additional information needed from the previous hearing. Mr. Wolk asked the basement floor elevation and estimated seasonal high groundwater level. Mr. Kirby replied that the basement floor is 2 feet above the seasonal high groundwater level. Ms. Miller read the engineering report which states, “This plan was modified to move the proposed construction away from the sewer easement. It appears that the modification is sufficient to protect the easement and the pipe. A small amount of grading takes place on the easement and can be permitted. The revisions do not affect the drainage calculations. Ms.