Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee 4-11-13 <br />7.82 Reimbursable expense Authorization <br />3/14/13 <br />Motion to approve a Reimbursable Expense Authorization in the amount of $22,927.74 to DiNisco Design Partnerships Contract <br />for Bid Document printing and distribution. <br />Motion Eric 2nd Jon Vote 5-0-0 <br />7.83 Shawmut Payment <br />3/14/13 <br />. # 8 in the amount of $1,656,629.00 and recommended approval to the PBC. <br />Motion: to approve Shawmut Design & Construction Application for Payment #8 in the amount of $1,656,629.00 as <br />recommended by the Architect of Record, DiNisco Design Partnership. <br />Motion Eric 2nd Chuck Vote 5-0-0 <br />7.84 Project Update <br />4/11/12 <br />CP provided a project update via a power point presentation. <br />Underground plumbing work underway <br />2nd and 3rd floor deck pours continue, neighbors advised of slab finishing work late into the evening. <br />South canopy steel being erected. Structural Steel work is substantially complete. <br />Exterior framing materials being delivered and framing underway. <br />Footings and Foundation walls being poured for loading dock area. <br />Electric duct banks underway. <br />Masonry work beginning as early as 4/22 and roof blocking begins in May. <br />Cx kick off mtg held for both MEP and Envelope. <br />Subcontractor Buyouts about 88% complete savings are approx 250,000 however the make up of this number is a touch uncertain <br />and needs to be verified by CP. <br />7.85 Interior Colors <br />4/11/12 <br />Ken DiNisco stated that a final discussion should take place soon on interior colors. <br />Ken will work directly with Carl and Eric to schedule a time too meet and review same, perhaps as early as next week. Ken will be <br />sure to include Sandy T. in those discussions. <br />7.86 Landscaping <br />4/11/13 <br />CP discussed a VE item that was previously discussed which related to an estimated savings of approx. $35,000 if the Town were to <br />assume responsibility for a portion of the landscaping work. Concerns discussed in acting on this VE item included, not Guarantee <br />of actual savings, draw on staff time both in DPF and DPW to complete, concern with having union and no-union contractors on the <br />site at the same time, warranty concerns on landscaping work by two different contractors, scheduling and coordination concerns <br />with different contractors. <br />Motion to not implement proposed VE item on landscaping @ Estabrook Project and allow Shawmut landscaper to retain work <br />and cost within GMP. <br />Motion Dick 2nd Eric Vote 5-0-0 <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br /> <br />