2013-11-21-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

seek one curb cut, and would find either four or six units acceptable. (LexHAB has sited the buildings farther from the road, and has eliminated one of the curb cuts.) Ms. Shaw stated that she thought the design of the buildings was attractive and that the homes would fit well in the neighborhood. Mr. Kanter noted that for LexHABs presentation rd to the CEC on December 3, he would like to see a by category cost breakdown, and the addition of the information on accessibility added to the application. He stressed that he did not want LexHAB to have to return to Town Meeting for additional funding. He said he applauded LexHABs ability to rehabilitate and build affordable housing, and questioned whether LexHAB had the staffing to oversee the project. Mr. Kennedy replied that the contractor would be overseeing the project, not LexHAB staff. Ms. Fenollosa asked if LexHAB would use students from Minuteman Vocational Technical School to do the construction, thus avoiding labor charges, to which Mr. Kennedy replied that it was their intention to do so. (8-0-1) There was a straw vote on the project, with the CPC voting (one abstention, pending further information), followed by a lengthy discussion of whether to take a final vote on the project. Members had been sent a number of emails from several residents of the Vine Street area and two from residents or former residents of the Busa Farm area. The Committee was sensitive to the comments of the public, but agreed that the CPC was not the approving authority for the project. The Committee does not have design review authority, but is limited by Statute to funding decisions. The Committee felt assured that there would be an opportunity for public input into the Busa Farm affordable housing proposal prior to Town Meeting. A majority of members of the CPC felt that there was little additional information needed on which to base a decision. The Committee was supportive of LexHABs proposal to build affordable housing, and agreed it was the Selectmens role to modify the design of the buildings or units if needed. The final vote was postponed until later in the meeting. 3.Hennessey Field Conservation Extension, $300,000 The CPC met with Dan Castagnozzi and a group of eleven interested abutters and neighbors regarding a neighborhood initiative to preserve approximately an acre of mature woodlands - the back section of a two acre lot at 7 Mountain Road abutting the Town-owned Hennessey Conservation Field. Mr. Castagnozzi described the land, highlighting its wildlife value, its proximity to existing Town-owned conservation land, and its historic nature. The larger two-acre parcel which includes the proposed acquisition has an existing historic home dating to 1753. The home is on the Massachusetts Register of Historic Places (the Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System)and was moved from Merrimack, New Hampshire to Mountain Road. The historic home is approximately 3,000 sq. ft, which Mr. Castagnozzi noted puts it in the more affordable range for Lexington. Mr. Castagnozzi showed pictures of Great Horned owls which nest on the property and noted that a variety of other wildlife frequents the parcel, including deer, fox and in the 1990s a black bear. He noted that the parcel serves as a passive recreation area for walkers and many birders, and provides a cut-through for school children. Therefore, he reasoned, the proposal addressed three CPA goals, Open Space, Historic Preservation and Recreation. (Neither the larger lot nor the section proposed for acquisition is on the Conservation Commission priority list for purchase.) In response to questions from Ms. Fenollosa, Mr. Castagnozzi explained that the lot is presently under agreement with a developer until April of 2014. The developer has met with the Planning Board staff and is pursuing a Comprehensive Permit, which if a By-Right Plan 3