Laserfiche WebLink
CPC funding will be used for the replacement of siding, entrance doors, fascia, and roofs. <br />Mr. Horton questioned whether any of the costs involved in the replacement might not be <br />eligible for CPA funding. The Committee discussed this issue and decided to check on this <br />matter. (The CPC reasoned, however, that because CPA funds were only requested for one- <br />third of the total project cost, any ineligible expenses could be covered in the remaining two <br />thirds DHCD funding .) Ms. Fenollosa questioned whether the CPC had approved funding in <br />a previous year for window replacement, to which Mr. Keane replied that the Committee <br />had, and that windows were not part of this project. He explained that the project would <br />cover all 48 units, and added that he had also applied for State funding for two €adaptable <br />units at Vynebrooke. These units would be fully funded by the State. <br />The CPC commended Mr. Keane for his diligence in securing State funding to offset CPA <br />appropriations. (Ms. Krieger also thanked Mr. Keane for his excellent and thorough <br />presentation at the recent First Friday meeting of the League of Women Voters.) The CPC <br />took a straw vote on this rehabilitation project and voted their approval (9-0). <br />3.Battle Green Mater Plan, Phase 3 - $90,000 <br /> ‚ David Pinsonneault, Director of Operations <br />for the DPW and Ms. Dawn McKenna, Chair of the Tourism Committee presented this <br />proposal to the CPC. Mr. Pinsonneault commenced the discussion explaining that rather than <br />applying for construction funds this year, it had been decided to more carefully address the <br />design phase of the project. He said there are anticipated changes to the Battle Green area, <br />which might necessitate design changes prior to construction. He noted that it was more <br />prudent to wait until the Center Committee had issued its report solidifying the design of the <br />Green and taking into account such things as the Buckman Tavern sidewalk renovations, and <br />the relocation of certain crosswalks, both of which would have an impact on the design of the <br />Battle Green sidewalks. Mr. Pinsonneault said that Phase 1 of the Battle Green Project <br />covered the rehabilitation of the monuments and Phase 2 included the renovation of <br />pathways and fencing. Since the Phase 2 work was integrally tied to the work around the <br />Green, it will be put on hold pending the Phase 3 design study. Ms. Fenollosa asked when the <br />Center Committee Study would be ready, to which Ms. McKenna replied that it would be <br />ready next month. <br />Mr. Kanter noted that the separation of design funds into two years seemed unusual. The <br />FY15 project calls for $90,000 in D&E funds this year, and $125,000 in FY16. Mr. <br />Pinsonneault said this was done at the suggestion of Mr. Livsey the Town Engineer. The <br />CPC suggested that Mr. Pinsonneault might wish to put all his D&E costs up front. He will <br />pursue this possibility with the Town Engineer. There was a brief discussion of the fountain <br />under the Captain Parker statue. Mr. Pinsonneault said the decision making on the fountain <br />centered on the color (bronze or verde green) and the specific use of the fountain. He said the <br />issue would need further public input. <br />Mr. Wolk said he was still confused about the status of the previous Battle Green projects for <br />which the CPC and Town Meeting had approved funding, given that some of them were not <br />affected by sidewalk and crosswalk configurations (for example, the monument <br />rehabilitation). He stressed that it would be helpful if the applicant compiled a spreadsheet <br />detailing when the project was approved, its description and its status. Members agreed, and <br />Mr. Pinsonneault will compile such a list. <br />2 <br /> <br />