Laserfiche WebLink
2014-02-20 Minutes <br />member. The amended agreement would allow a member to withdraw, upon 60-days’ <br />notice, unless a majority of member communities, at a town meeting convened within <br />that time period, vote to disapprove; and the withdrawing member would not be <br />responsible for any debt approved by a region-wide referendum vote thatprompted its <br />withdrawal. <br />A ¾ vote of school committee members, rather than a majority, would be required to <br />initiate amendments to the regional agreement. Ten percent of the registered voters in <br />any member community could also petition for a change. Unanimous approval by all <br />member communities at a town meeting would still be required to make any change. <br />Efforts are underway to implement a facility fee for non-member communities, by inter- <br />governmental agreement, whichwouldhelp cover capital costs;currently, non-member <br />Towns only pay a state-set tuitionrate for their students, which can only be used for <br />educating the students. The facility fee arrangementmust be approved by the State and <br />would be ground-breaking. <br />Mr. Mahoney further commented as follows: <br />Currently, a town wanting to withdraw as a member can do so without incurring any <br />debt, but the withdrawal must be approved by the other member towns. <br />Thirty-five towns send students to MTI, and only 16 of those towns are members. <br />Non-membertowns send 45% of the students; this includes Watertown, which sends 75- <br />80 students. <br />The State sets the tuition for out-of-district students based on a formula. <br />In most cases, it is financially advantageous for non-member Towns to pay tuition for its <br />MTI students,rather than join as a member. <br />Other technological high schools havewaiting lists; they do not have the same problems <br />faced by MTI. <br />The current MTI building is 40 years old and needs to becompletely renovated or <br />replaced. The facilitywas designed to handle 800 students; there are questions about <br />what size facility should be built to replace it. A facility study, including enrollment <br />analysis,should be completed in June.If the 16 member towns are exclusively <br />responsible for the costs of a replacement facility(net of MSBA funding that should <br />cover at least 40% of the cost), it is unlikely they will support a new building. <br />MTI currently has 716 students; 30-40 additional students are expected in the 2014-2015 <br />freshman class. Enrollment has been increasingbecause of a demand for MTI programs. <br />Although the implementation of facility fees would address some of the problems <br />associated with capital costs, the regional agreement needs to be amended with or without <br />this component; changes to incentivize communities to join as members are important. <br />There was discussion about this Committee’s support of Article 23, which is asking for support <br />of the recommended agreement. It was generally agreed that the recommended agreement is <br />beneficial to Lexington. <br />Announcements and Liaison Reports: <br />2.Mr. Levine reported that he, Mr. Parker, Mr. <br />Addelson and the Town Manager met with the Town’s actuary regarding “other post- <br />employment benefit”(OPEB) obligations; i.e. the health insurance obligationsfor retirees. A <br />new actuarial studywas recently prepared, but is not yet publicly available because it is still in <br />2 <br /> <br />