Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2014-02-20 Minutes <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />February20,2014 <br />: LegionRoom,Cary MemorialBuilding,7:30p.m. <br />:Glenn Parker, Chair; John Bartenstein, Vice Chair and Secretary; Robert <br />Cohen; Alan Levine;Susan McLeish;Eric Michelson; Jonina Schonfeld; Rob Addelson (non- <br />voting, ex officio) <br />Members Absent:Mollie Garberg;Richard Neumeier <br />Others Present:Norm Cohen, Board of Selectmen (BoS); Joe Pato, BoS; Carl Valente, Town <br />Manager; Kevin Mahoney, Assistant Superintendent, Minuteman Technical Institute (MTI); <br />David Horton, MTI School Committee, Lexington Representative; AndreiRadulescu-Banu, <br />Precinct 8 Town Meeting member <br />The meetingwas calledto order at 7:35p.m. <br />Amendments to MTI Regional Agreement(Article 23): <br />1.Mr. Mahoney reported on the <br />14-month effortto updatethe regional agreement that governs MTI’s 16 member communities, <br />which will be addressed under Article 23 at the Annual Town Meeting. Thedifficult process <br />was considered necessary to move forward pending capital improvement projects as well as for <br />the long-term sustainability of the programs offered by the institution.Usingslides, he reviewed <br />the eight changes that are being recommended, noting the following: <br />Changing toa four-year rolling enrollment average for determining the operating cost <br />allocations is expected tominimize financial spikes for the participating towns. <br />Rather than only using the most recent enrollment figures for determining capital cost <br />allocations, therecommendation is to useseveral formulas, as follows: <br />16%tobe shared equally by the 16member towns; <br />50% tobe allocated to the member towns based on the four-year rolling enrollment <br />average; <br />The balance tobe allocatedusing the state-generated Chapter 70 formula, which <br />factors in income and property values, as well as enrollment figuresfor each town. <br />A 2/3 majority vote of school committee members would be required for approving debt. <br />If the debt is not approved by all member communities at town meeting, as currently <br />required, there would be an alternative option for a referendum vote in a district-wide <br />election, and the debt could be approved by a majority of the aggregate votes cast. <br />The followingrecommended changes areincluded to incentivize townsto become <br />members: <br />TheSchool Committeecannegotiate a gradual 4-year “buy-in”before a town <br />assumes full responsibility ofcapital costs, assuming approval by the member towns. <br />Cities as well as towns can become member communities. <br />The withdrawalprocess fora member community will be less onerous. <br />Currently, withdrawal of a member requires approval by all member communities and the <br />withdrawing member remains liable for its share of debt approved while it was a <br />1 <br /> <br />