2011-11-21-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

interior work. Mr. Kanter said it appeared from his calculations that the interior cost was $198,550 and demolition, $162,450. Mr. Goddard noted that there was a generous contingency cost in the proposal, and that in fact, he hoped that project could be completed for less than $500,000. Mr. Kanter asked if the Liberty Ride did not occupy the building whether the interior would be used by other groups. Mr. Goddard responded that it was his decision to determine the use of the building, only to supervise the renovation work. Mr. Wolk questioned how much the interior renovations were prompted by the Liberty Ride’s interest in the White House. Ms. McKenna responded to this question, explaining that the Liberty Ride component was not driving the interior renovations. She explained however, that it would be very convenient for the Ride to commence at the White House. The ride presently starts at the National Heritage Museum, she noted, which is not open during some of the weekend hours that the Ride is in service and does not have restroom facilities. In response to a question about parking, she stated that there are approximately 10 cars for each Ride. Mr. Goddard added that the Selectmen have approved the “process” he has followed to date regarding the White House project. 4.Cary Memorial Building Upgrades – Mr. Goddard also presented this project, which sought $550,000 in FY 13 for design and engineering work, with a projected rehabilitation cost in FY 14 of $7.2 million. Mr. Goddard distributed the Executive Summary from the Issac Harris Cary Memorial Building Evaluation, (dated June 1, 2011) to the Committee. The CPC had previously received the Summary, and had been notified that the full report was available on line. Mr. Goddard explained the recommended upgrades to the Cary Memorial Building, and noted that the intent was to return it to its 1927 grandeur, but with modern technology that improved its use as a performance space, meeting hall, and location for smaller meetings for Town-affiliated groups. Upgrades included: accessibility upgrades, interior structural repairs and modifications, fire protection improvements, plumbing improvements, HVAC upgrades, acoustical improvements, stage improvements and auditorium and support space upgrades. Mr. Goddard noted that he would be recommending a additional custodial position be added so that the Town did not have to pay overtime for weekend custodial work. He said that funding of the entire project (both FY13 and FY14) were very much “open for discussion”, and that he would be willing to work with the Committee to tailor the project to suit the availability of CPA funds. Ms. Manz commended the level of detail in the lengthy Building Evaluation Report, but questioned whether everything in the report had to be accomplished. Mr. Adler later echoed this sentiment, saying that “needs” 3