Laserfiche WebLink
might be addressed now, and “wants” could be postponed. There was a <br />general discussion of how the work on the Cary Memorial Building could best <br />be accomplished, given (1) the large scope and cost of the work, (2) an <br />economy that is presently favorable to bidding such jobs, and (3) the present <br />demands for CPA funds. Ms. Manz asked how long the estimates from the <br />design study might be valid, to which Mr. Goddard replied that it would be <br />hard to estimate. He added that the project could be phased over 3-4 years, but <br />that total costs would necessarily be higher. Mr. Kanter asked if the design <br />and engineering estimates could be phased, but this raised the question of <br />prioritizing the elements of work. The CPC then posed the question of how it <br />could prioritize work in the absence of direction from the Town. Mr. Goddard <br />reiterated his desire for direction from the Committee in terms of a “dollar <br />amount”. He said with that as a guideline, he could then work within the <br />public process to define the most important renovation components. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5.Buckman Tavern Historic Structure Report – <br />Susan Bennett, Director of <br />the Historical Society met with the CPC to request $65,000 for the funding of <br />a Historic Structure Report for the Buckman Tavern. Though the building has <br />been well-studied, she said a Historic Structures Report was needed prior to <br />doing necessary capital improvements and upgrades to the structure. She <br />noted that some of the improvements would include an adequate ADA ramp, <br />sprinkler and wiring systems that are up to code, restrooms for visitors, <br />redesigned exhibit space, and perhaps a lift similar to the Munroe Tavern. She <br />said the current request of $65,000 would cover both the report and <br />construction drawings. In response to a question from Mr. Adler, she <br />explained that State and Federal sources of funding are typically not available <br />for Historic Structure Reports but might be for the later rehabilitation. She <br />stated two sources of funding that she may pursue; the Preservation Projects <br /> <br />Fund, and the Massachusetts Cultural Facilities Fund. <br /> <br />Ms. Stolz questioned Ms. Bennett about rehabilitation of the landscaping <br />around the Tavern. Ms. Bennett explained that since historic plantings around <br />the Tavern were nearly non-existent in the early 1700’s, the “landscaping” <br />plan for Buckman was essentially a vegetation removal plan. There was a <br />discussion of the herb garden at the Tavern, and an overhanging walnut tree <br />which contributes to roof problems. A general discussion followed regarding <br />the Town’s ownership of the Tavern, the Historical Society’s lease on the <br />property, and whether the public bidding process must be followed for the <br />rehabilitation phase of the Tavern. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6.Historical RecordsPreservation <br /> – Ms. Bennett also presented this project <br />on behalf of the Historical Society. She explained that this $77,268 project <br />request was for the preservation of the Historical Society’s records, many of <br />which of are of “high interest”. She said the Society is the steward of the First <br /> 4 <br /> <br />