2012-01-09-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

structure to be moved to a remote site should a request be made to the Commission. She reported that they, and the HC, are in full support of the present project, however. Mr. Adler raised questions regarding the Paint Mine Barn Restoration project. He said he had done a cost analysis of the renovation work, and had come up with a total for the construction costs of $7,600. He said he felt the estimate of $34,770 was extremely high. Members questioned who had put together the request. The cost analysis was compiled by Mr. Goddard and the Minuteman Career and Technical High School Carpentry Lab. There was a lengthy discussion of the LexHAB proposal for Set-Aside Funds. Mr. Cohen reported that he had spoken with Mr. Kennedy, Chairman of LexHAB, and that Mr. Kennedy had said that LexHAB would be agreeable to using the set-aside funds for construction of new units at sites such as the Leary or Busa properties. Ms. Fenollosa voiced her concern about the LexHAB request, stating that since FY08, LexHAB has only contributed 10 units to the Town’s affordable housing stock with CPA funds, while the Lexington Housing Authority (LHA) has benefitted 148 units with their CPA monies.. She also noted that LexHAB contributes very little of its own funds and does not seek grant assistance, thereby eliminating any possibility of leveraging CPA funds. She acknowledged that creation of new affordable housing units was an important goal for the CPC, and suggested that the approval of the Lexington Housing Authority request to construct 4 accessible units might be a better use of CPA funds. Mr. Kanter noted that LexHAB will have leftover monies from the purchase of the Wilson Road home made with last year’s grant of set-aside funds, and that keeping the funding at $450,000 (instead of increasing it to the requested $500,000) for FY13 might be adequate. He added that given the state of the economy and current housing prices, FY13 could also be the year for a hiatus. Ms. Weiss noted that LexHAB may not have undertaken the construction of new scattered-site units because there was little available Town land for doing so. Though she said she understood Ms. Fenollosa’s and Mr. Kanter’s points of view, Ms. Manz said she felt LexHAB had recently shown genuine willingness to work with the Board of Selectmen and CPC to establish units on parcels with pending development plans. She asked for a vote of the Committee (1) for the project as it was submitted, and (2) with the caveat that CPA funds be used to develop new single or multiple units at properties previously purchased with CPA funds (Busa, Leary). There was greater support for approving the LexHAB request if CPA funds were targeted for new unit development. The Committee discussed the Greeley Village Accessible Housing Project, noting its large FY13 request of $1,110,673. While members were discussing the pros and cons of the project, Mr. Sweeney received a call from Steve Keane, Director of the Lexington Housing Authority. Mr. Keane informed Mr. McSweeney, and the Committee, that he had just received word from the 3