|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2011-11-AC-STM-rpt
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
ELECTIONS AND TOWN MEETING ACTION & WARRANTS
>
Town Meeting Minutes and Reports
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
Reports
>
2011-11-AC-STM-rpt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 4:16:07 PM
Creation date
3/4/2013 7:41:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2011
Author or Source
Appropriation Committee
Department
Recreation
Keywords or Subject
Town Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE REPORT TO NOVEMBER 2011 STM <br /> ing the elimination of infiltration and inflow (I/I) into the sewer system.3 The proposed adjustments to <br /> debt service, which were taken into account this fall in setting the FY12 water and sewer rates, are as fol- <br /> lows: <br /> FY12 Debt Service Costs <br /> Original Budget Amended Budget Change <br /> Water $1,202,906 $1,258,968 $56,062 <br /> Sewer $683,223 $879,713 $196,490 <br /> 3. Appropriation of Additional Retained Earnings. Continuing a practice that has now been followed for <br /> several years, a portion of the certified retained earnings in both the water and sewer enterprise funds — <br /> $450,000 from the water fund and$300,000 from the sewer fund—was appropriated at the 2011 Annual <br /> Town Meeting to provide "rate relief," i.e., to lower the increase in the FY12 water and sewer rates that <br /> would otherwise be required to cover anticipated increases in operating and capital costs. <br /> At this fall's rate-setting, faced with an unexpectedly large proposed rate increase, the Board of Select- <br /> men voted to mitigate that increase by applying an additional$200,000 of retained earnings from the wa- <br /> ter enterprise fund, above and beyond the amounts already appropriated at the Annual Town Meeting, <br /> bringing the total retained earnings draw to $650,000 from the water fund and $300,000 from the sewer <br /> fund. This had the effect of lowering the necessary water rate increase from 7.3% to 3.9% and the com- <br /> bined water and sewer rate increase from 12.8% to 11.8%. Town Meeting is now asked to appropriate the <br /> additional retained earnings required to implement that decision. <br /> Given a recent history of relatively modest water and sewer rate increases, the much larger increase this <br /> year received some publicity and may have come as a surprise to some. We provide below a brief expla- <br /> nation of why this year's water and sewer rate increase was unexpectedly large. <br /> As reflected in the table below, increases in water and sewer rates have been extremely modest in recent <br /> years — until this year averaging only about 1.5% per year, well below the annual increases in MWRA <br /> assessments and Town operating costs,which together have averaged about 4%per year. <br /> Combined Water/Sewer Cost and Rate Increases <br /> FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 <br /> MWRA Cost 7.0% 0.9% 6.9% 3.0% 3.9% 6.3% <br /> Town Cost 10.3% -6.7% 5.7% 2.9% 1.9% 4.7% <br /> Total Cost 8.1% -1.63% 6.5% 2.9% 3.3% 5.8% <br /> Rates 6.6% 0.0% 2.9% -3.8% 1.7% 11.8% <br /> Several factors have combined to keep the rate increases low during this time period: (1) the gradual elim- <br /> ination of PILOT payments to the general fund(begun in FY07 and completed in FY10); (2) the gradual <br /> reduction of indirect costs paid to the general fund to more closely reflect the enterprise funds' usage of <br /> Town services (begun in FY07 and to be completed in FY12); (3) the shift of capital expenditures from <br /> largely cash capital to largely borrowing, which has had the effect of temporarily reducing capital costs; <br /> (4) earlier reliance on a conservative set of usage assumptions resulting in the receipt of higher-than- <br /> projected revenue, boosting the funds' retained earnings; and (5) the initiation of a practice beginning in <br /> s Debt service attributable to the same MWRA loan,in the amount of approximately$140,000,was also omitted <br /> from the FY11 budget and in FY11 rate-setting. This cost was effectively covered by the sewer enterprise fund's <br /> retained earnings during FY11,even though not appropriated,and the retained earnings balance in the sewer fund as <br /> of the end of FY11 (see Table below)is net of that amount. <br /> Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.