|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-12-17-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-12-17-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
3/12/2009 10:30:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the Meeting of December 17, 2008 Page 5 <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig thanked the presenters and said they should come back before the Board with a draft before <br />they file. <br /> <br />Hartwell Avenue Area Study; Warrant Articles: <br />FAR: <br />Mr. Canale made a recommendation to make Lexington’s method of calculating the FAR more compliant <br />with other communities to encourage more efficient buildings. <br />Mr. Zurlo did not agree that it would make building more efficient and did not see the value of fine-tuning <br />the way Lexington determined the FAR. <br />Mr. Hornig said it had been requested by others to make it more uniform. Mr. Zurlo said the EDTF did <br />discuss the Cecil Group’s material regarding the FAR and while they said the definition was unique it was <br />not cited as a significant issue. <br />Mr. Galaitsis said this was the first time he was seeing this; where did the new FAR figures come from <br />and why were the parking controls removed? <br />Permitted Uses: <br />Mr. Hornig said it was too broad and the Board would need to be more specific for changes to the uses <br />table. <br />Traffic: <br />Ms. McCall-Taylor said creating an alternative traffic overlay district would be a way to get monies into <br />traffic mitigation funds legally. Mr. Henry said impact fees were a gray area and this would allow options <br />when submitting this plan to the Attorney General’s Office. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale preferred keeping the .15 FAR and requiring anything greater to comply with the required <br />mitigations established. Mr. Hornig said that would require a special permit for everything. Mr. Galaitsis <br />said the bottom line would be if the changes addressed the present and future traffic problems in the <br />nearby residential area. Mr. Zurlo said it was important to remove the trip wire of requiring level of <br />service (LOS) D and instead redefine what traffic means. Get the intersections improved, but it should <br />include other modalities. Mr. Galaitsis said Town Meeting would be voting without a clear plan <br />established. Ms. McCall-Taylor said there would be only an outline. <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said that the Board would have more specific things to talk about. <br />?? <br />How would transit fit into this? <br />?? <br />The total cost under assumed build out. <br />?? <br />What percentage landowners would contribute. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.