Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> December 5, 2007 <br /> <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />December 5, 2007 <br /> <br />Place and Time: Town Office Building, Room 111 <br /> <br /> <br />Members Present:Alan Levine (Chair), John Bartenstein (Secretary), Deborah Brown, Rod Cole, <br />Pam Hoffman, Susan McLeish, Mike Kennealy <br /> <br />Also present - Michael Young (Budget Officer), George Burnell, Selectman, Tom Diaz (Chair – <br />School Committee), and Tom Griffiths (member – School Committee) <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 7:38 p.m. <br /> <br /> Burlington Plan and Reserves <br />1. . Deborah Brown distributed a memo outlining the <br />Burlington Plan – essentially, the methodology used by the Town of Burlington to address special <br />education funding. George Burnell was invited to the meeting as he had expressed some concerns <br />regarding the Burlington Plan. One major goal of the proposal is that responsibility for overruns <br />should belong to the Town as a whole rather than only with the schools so that the rest of the <br />school budget then doesn’t automatically have to cover any shortfall. Transparency is a second <br />major goal, i.e., a clear delineation of SPED out-of-district and transportation expenses from the <br />rest of the school budget would enable a clearer consideration of each part. <br /> <br />The discussion covered potential under-budgeting of SPED expenses when the budget estimates <br />only account for students known or reasonably expected to require out-of-district placement, <br />whether the proposal will necessitate a change in management authority, what entity will have the <br />responsibility for overruns, the issues that would be raised if overruns occur many months before <br />Town Meeting could act, how much should be put in reserve, and where reserves should be kept. <br />Details of how the proposal could be implemented were also discussed, including whether to move <br />SPED out-of-district and transportation costs from the school budget to Shared Expenses or to a <br />separate line item in the education part of the Town budget like the line item for Lexington’s share <br />of Minuteman Regional High School expenses. <br /> <br />There was discussion of how a SPED line item would be handled in the annual development of the <br />budget, i.e., whether it would be allocated together with other nondiscretionary spending first and <br />how it would impact the school/municipal revenue split. It was noted that it would be possible to <br />treat a SPED line item as a shared expense even if it was not in that part of the Town budget. <br /> <br />It was stated that the issues for the Committee can be summarized by three questions: <br /> <br />?? <br />Should there be a separate line for SPED expenses, and, if so, where? <br />?? <br />Who/what is responsible if expenses come in over budget? <br />?? <br />Should there be a reserve structure and how should it work? <br /> <br />Alan Levine asked for the Committee’s feel regarding a separate line item and if there is an <br />overrun, who would be responsible until Town Meeting acts? The Committee agreed with the idea <br /> <br />