|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2005-07-21-AC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
2005-07-21-AC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 3:25:58 PM
Creation date
3/9/2009 5:03:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2005
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 21, 2005 <br /> <br />Carl V. said this was the first town he has worked in with separate Capital Expenditure <br />Committee (CEC) and AC, and he asked how that worked. Al L. replied that we have so <br />many articles with multiple aspects that it would be very hard for one committee to <br />handle all the details in both financial and capital articles. So we tend to rely on the CEC <br />to help us understand capital issues, although we make our own recommendations. We <br />often have joint meetings on capital issues. Tom G. noted that a chief difference is CEC <br />works with a five year plan. Paul H. added that the AC feels it should not just duplicate <br />CEC work, but we do review their work, and we look at how capital fits within the rest of <br />the town budget, for example balancing capital needs vs. operation needs. Tom D. noted <br />the AC is more neutral regarding capital than the CEC which has more of a policy <br />agenda. Deborah B. noted that in fairness, the CEC may feel like the only advocates for <br />capital needs. <br /> <br />4. Paul H. discussed the work of the Health Benefits Review Committee. We are <br />fortunate there are people in town who are experts on the issues and willing to help with <br />studies. Al L. noted that retiree health care costs and other future expenses are looming. <br />Carl V. noted that a subcommittee on GASB 43 and 45 (government accounting <br />statements that will be effective next year requiring the disclosure in financial statements <br />of accrued non-pension employee retirement benefits) would be useful, but water/sewer <br />issues are perhaps a higher priority. <br /> <br />5. Notes on Meetings: <br /> <br />a) Paul H. attended a meeting with selectmen Norman Cohen and Jeanne Krieger on <br />July 8: Jeanne said Assistant Town Manager Linda Vine nearly had in place a <br />“carve out” for drugs. Health Benefits Review Committee Chair Richard <br />Dougherty would check out remaining legal issues. <br /> <br />b) Deborah B. discussed the Finance Director Search Committee. The committee <br />met a few times in groups with Carl V. We are not being overwhelmed with <br />applications. The salary range may need to be increased. The issue of dual <br />reporting role (to BOS and Town Manager) and lack of clarity on how that works <br />may also be a problem. Tom G. also noted that Dana Hamm is leaving as <br />Facilities Director for the Lexington Public Schools. <br /> <br />th <br />c) We agreed to meet every two weeks in the fall, starting September 8, with no <br />th <br />meetings in August after the 4. <br /> <br />6. There was a brief discussion of the need to understand the issues around the CPA. <br /> <br />The meeting was adjourned at approximately 10 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Rod Cole <br /> <br />Approved October 20, 2005 <br /> - 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.