Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee 31 May 2012 <br />7.32 Designer Update for 4/12/12 <br />4/12/12 <br />DDP has continued to move forward on project, process is going well. <br />DDP has had 2 meetings with Shawmut and reports that they are bringing good ideas to the table. <br />Shawmut is preparing independent estimate that should be available in 2 weeks (4/26/12). <br />Shawmut is estimating MSBA submission with new items & materials noted to compare delta to original estimate. <br />DPF has met with DPW and Rec Dept. to discuss field use and maintenance and has forwarded recommendations to design team. <br />Discussion on possible added costs for grading of field as well as options for sod versus seed. <br />DiNisco states final decisions are needed within 2 weeks on grading and seed /sod. <br />DDP updated PBC on discussions from working group meetings on possible use of limestone, split face block. Rendered elevations <br />were also available showing zinc panels, limestone and overall fenestration. <br />Loading dock discussions, included adding a small roof over entry door, locations for dumpsters, screen wall at back of loading <br />dock. <br />7.33 Design Development <br />4/12/12 <br />Design Development scheduled to be complete the end of April. <br />PBC Recommends School Department and School Committee have a process of formal sign off of the Design Development Package. <br />7.34 Designer Update for 4 -26 -12 <br />4/26/12 <br />Chris Hildreth of RDK engineers was present to give an overview of the MEP systems on the project. RDK also provided HVAC <br />narrative and updated energy analysis. Proposed system is a chilled beam induction system. <br />Additional material will be prepared and demonstrate the comparative data for other systems evaluated. This information to be <br />shared with Energy Committee. <br />RDK also discussed energy rebates briefly as well as other measures such as Dark Schools, day - lighting, light sensors etc. DPF will <br />contact ECC chair and seek feedback. <br />ECC was invited to the 4/26/12 PBC meeting to evaluate comparative data on Mechanical system options and energy model <br />updates. While only one member of the ECC was available for the meeting the Mechanical consultant was equally not able to <br />provide the documentation the facilities department was seeking. Updated material was requested from the engineer and Pat G. <br />will work with ECC to reach consensus on systems. <br />Designer briefly updated PBC on continued discussion of materials for fagade and general design features and building elevations. <br />PBC requested cost comparative data for limestone and similar materials proposed. DDP stated that the next working group <br />meeting would included continuation of design discussion. <br />7.35 Collaborative Partners Update for 4/26/12 <br />4/26/12 <br />Joe R. introduced members of the Shawmut team and provided a brief update on the status of estimating which included <br />Shawmut's first pass at an estimate on the project. CP was in the process of comparing the Shawmut estimate with that of the <br />schematic design and it was not ready for full discussion. PBC requested a systems summary estimate and Shawmut agreed. <br />7.36 Collaborative Partners Protect Update for 5/10/12 <br />5/10/12 <br />Joe Riley discussion on Cost estimate comparative of Shawmut estimate and schematic design estimate. Next Friday (5/18/12) is <br />deliverable for DD estimate and reconciliation is scheduled for two days 5/20 and 5/21. Cost Estimates to be discussed in more <br />detail at next 5/24/12 PBC meeting. <br />• PBC discussed location of CM trailers would prefer to place them inside the fence. <br />• Question is there - Fence on top of retaining wall. <br />• Meeting with Fire Dept. and Building Inspector on 6/1. <br />• Met today 5/10/12 with Building Inspector and reviewed site logistics fully for building permit for retaining wall. Building <br />Inspector ok with foundation permit. <br />• Met with Shawmut and abatement contractors to walk through building. Shawmut will obtain numbers for abatement for <br />contractors to validate estimate. <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />