|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
AHFC School Report 10 2009 Final
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
BUILDINGS, LAND, UTILITIES & TRANS REPORTS
>
Lexington Public Schools
>
AHFC School Report 10 2009 Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2012 12:00:24 PM
Creation date
10/10/2012 11:28:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town committees had anticipated that all of the schools would eventually be replaced <br />with new buildings. The current Commonwealth school construction reimbursement <br />program (the "Massachusetts School Building Authority" or "MSBA ") applies criteria for <br />participation that are much harder to meet than were those of the former SBA program. <br />If a Lexington project were able to meet the more stringent criteria, the Town could <br />expect reimbursements just above the 30% range. It is with this observation that the <br />AHFC recommends that Bowman and Bridge be renovated due to the low likelihood of <br />either school being approved to receive MSBA funds for either renovation or a total <br />replacement. <br />• While the AHFC presents recommendations below, these recommendations may be <br />reprioritized due to other realities and the political pressures of "overrides." <br />In responding to item 2, above, of the School Committee charge, the AHFC notes that <br />less than acceptable building conditions are tantamount to "deficiencies having an effect <br />on the educational process." Thus the Committee focused on attending to the renovations <br />at the elementary schools in the same light as the proposed renovations and new <br />construction at the high school. <br />• The AHFC recommended that the School Committee submit to the MSBA a "Statement <br />of Interest" (SOI) for the High School, because the High School project seems more <br />likely to be approved than the other projects in the Master Plan. Having said that, the <br />Committee also believes that the proposed building program needs to be fully vetted. <br />The AHFC notes that some aspects of the work at Lexington High School may need to <br />precede the SOI acceptance because of existing conditions, but recommends that as much <br />of the full scope of work be in stride with the main renovation and new construction <br />project as the SOI process and its timing allow. <br />Recommendations <br />With a quorum present, the Ad Hoc School Facilities Committee unanimously voted the <br />following recommendations. (Note that the recommendations are not listed in priority order.) <br />High School: Prepare and submit the Statement of Interest for the full project as <br />described in the Design Partnership Master Plan. Thereafter, write Warrant Articles for <br />design and then construction. Go through the necessary selection processes. <br />2. High School roofing and mechanical systems scope requiring immediate attention: Write <br />a Warrant Article to cover the bid documents and construction related to the High School <br />roof and mechanical systems scope requiring immediate attention. Go through the <br />necessary selection processes. <br />3. Bowman and Bridge: Write an Article to cover the preparation of Bid Documents for <br />Priority 1 and 2 + HC -1 and HC -2 scopes of work as contained in the Design Partnership <br />Master Plan. Solicit designer interest and select the designer. Thereafter, prepare an <br />Article for construction. Go through the necessary selection processes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.