|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2009-02-12-LBAC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Lexington Bicycle Advisory Committee-LBAC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
2009-02-12-LBAC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2009 12:12:18 PM
Creation date
3/4/2009 12:12:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />3. Crosswalks along Spring Street at the intersections with Grasslands, <br />Hudson, and Underwood, with: <br /> a) a textured or painted surface as well as hatched crossing lines on <br />each crosswalk; <br /> b) combined vehicle speed limit and actual vehicle speed displays on <br />a post at roadside in at least one location; <br /> c) Appropriate signs of warning approach and at actual crosswalk <br />locations. <br /> <br />4. White sideline striping along both sides of Spring Street indicating the <br />outside edge of the travel lane at 10 feet from the centerline. This would <br />serve to calm traffic and provide a safe lane for cyclists. <br /> <br />With respect to the widening of Marrett Road as another aspect of the Spring <br />Street plan, Abe said he thought the problems on 2A are an example of what can <br />happen when widening and striping isn’t properly planned. If there are two lanes <br />for traffic, he said, bike lanes need to be provided so that there is at least 3 feet <br />inside the stripe. <br /> <br />The committee proceeded to have a general discussion with guests Dave <br />Cannon and Sue Yanofsky about sideline striping on Spring Street. Dave <br />Cannon said that the town conforms to Mass Highway guidelines; 11 foot lanes <br />conform with those policy standards, since the road is classified as a minor <br />arterial. Lexington will not recommend 10 foot lanes, he said. Sue Yanofsky <br />added that the town engineers would not narrow lanes to 10 feet unless town <br />authorities changed general policies. <br /> <br />Richard Canale said that the town needs to look at context and on “what roads <br />should look like.” The Planning Board is key, he said, and used the Hartwell <br />Avenue rezoning as an example of general examination of traffic calming. This is <br />an extremely important policy issue, he said: how do you ensure equitable <br />treatment of different modes of traffic on our streets and roads? <br /> <br />Dave Cannon said that, if the town deviates from current policy, it will want to <br />justify that departure. He then asked the committee for advice on a specific <br />issue on Spring Street related to saving several oak trees: in order to save the <br />trees, the town will want to narrow the roadway from 24 feet to 22 feet of <br />pavement (allowing 10 foot lanes at a short stretch). Committee members had <br />several suggestions, including leaving more space on the uphill side of the street. <br />Other discussion focused on bike lanes on the sidewalks, “share the street” <br />signs, other visual cues to show that bikes would be forced closer to the traffic, <br />etc. Peggy said she would email members and remind them to take a look at <br />the area being discussed and provide feedback to Dave. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.