2008-10-01-PB-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Page 4 Minutes for the Meeting of October 1, 2008 turnout. ?? Not sure why you are exempting all the landscape standards - revisit this issue. ?? Traffic calming measures for Spring Street, Shade Street and Concord Avenue. ?? Why not just make required frontage zero? ?? Dimensional controls match the development data exactly so they have no leeway without having to come back to Town Meeting. ?? Height of 57 feet is calculated by the ZBL. Consider all three structures. You might want some wiggle room. ?? There would be a 90-foot setback from the property edge; what about the 200 foot setback from Old Shade Street? There would be a 150-foot setback from the property line and then the wetlands, Conservation restriction and walking easement. ?? If there were changes made later in the CRO Zone developer could not just pick and choose the changes. CD is not an overlay so any future changes in the CRO zone would not affect this property. ?? Have we heard from engineering yet regarding pumping station capacity? Ms. McCall-Taylor said they had a verbal that it was fine, but nothing official. ?? Would there be any wireless cell phone towers? No, only repeater antennae requested by the fire department. ?? The Planning Board report from the 2003 Town Meeting suggested everything north of the driveway be part of the buffer and now there is building there. ?? The roof structures should be more defined. Mr. Hornig said at the public hearing on October 22 would be a time for the public input and tonight they heard the input from the Board. **************************HARTWELL AVENUE AREA STUDY************************** October 4 Meeting Scenarios: Mr. Henry discussed the three scenarios for the presentation on the rezoning of Hartwell Avenue reflecting no changes, modest increase and substantial increases. Board comments: ?? Remove the site coverage from presentation; ?? Add some general square footage and dimensions of lots; ?? Remove FAR(L) and just use FAR;