Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of October 1, 2008 Page 3 <br /> <br />Board Comments: <br />?? <br />Have you gone before Conservation? There is a hearing on 10/7. <br />?? <br />Consider no left turn on to the site from Spring Street from 7-9 a.m. <br />?? <br /> <br />Traffic was of interest, consider doing some testing. Would a traffic officer make any <br />difference? <br />?? <br />Does anyone look at the traffic reports that are issued? Yes. <br />?? <br />Do you really anticipate needing all those parking spaces that exceed the projected vehicle trips? <br />One way to limit vehicle trips would be to reduce capacity for vehicle parking. <br />?? <br />When collecting data on impact try to assess the level of service with various mitigations. <br />?? <br />Consider a garage structure that could allow unneeded parking spaces to be converted to office <br />space. <br />?? <br />What would be on the top floor? Penthouse and some skylights for atrium, stairwells and elevator <br />would be within the penthouse. <br />?? <br />Would like a site visit using balloons at corners for views from Woodcliffe and Monroe Road. <br />?? <br />Want an explanation of site distance analysis based on speeds on Spring Street and Hayden <br />Avenue and when were counts done? Early June. Is there any other TDM as backup? The Town <br />is planning a sidewalk along Spring Street; at the intersection of Hayden Avenue and Spring <br />Street there may possibly be a traffic officer or a light. <br />?? <br />Have you fulfilled your commitment to the previous TDM requirements including having a traffic <br />coordinator? They responded that they had a traffic coordinator. <br />?? <br />Like to see no access to and from the residential area on Spring Street. (No left in, no right out) <br />?? <br />The Cecil report talked about an increase in intensity on Hartwell Avenue. If Town gave it to <br />Beal why not give it to all and would it be sustainable? <br />?? <br />Rezoning the entire parcel not just Ledgemont three so it should all be included in the application. <br />?? <br />Need to be clear on dimensional standards for the whole site and if it was unclear in the PSDUP it <br />would go back to the bylaw of specific year for the other buildings. <br />?? <br />Environmental aesthetics - these buildings would have many windows and would be directly <br />across from residential neighborhood. There were no measures in the PSDUP to show minimizing <br />the internal light spill on to the residents. This is a LEEDS certified building and must relate to its <br />environment. There would down lights, interior room lights would be on sensors and use ambient <br />light levels. <br />?? <br />It would be wise to work with the residents and neighborhoods. Are there any plans for that? <br />There was a meeting for immediate abutters the previous Thursday evening that had very poor <br /> <br />