|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-08-27-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-08-27-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 12:53:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the Meeting of August 27, 2008 Page 5 <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said he would like to see the drive back to 18 feet at the top of the site. Mr. Waitt said he had <br />to defer to the Fire Chief. Mr. Hornig would like a draft of the easements for the water line and the <br />pedestrian path; move the driveway and show snow removal storage. <br /> <br />Audience Comments: <br />Mr. Dave Langseth said the submittal sent to the Board and endorsed by the neighborhood might have <br />inaccurate data. If the Assessor’s numbers were off, the neighborhood might be even less dense then <br />presented in the data submitted. The concern with this plan was it focused on only two aspects of the <br />zoning bylaws and ignored a major requirement that it should fit into the neighborhood. Proposing a cap <br />and reducing density could help to deal with other issues. <br /> <br />Ms. Klostermann of 343 Marrett Road said her property cuts into the hill. A structure 30 feet tall on top of <br />the bank would be a large presence overlooking her house. There was also quite a bit of ledge and would <br />they be removing mature growth? If they planned to blast, she wanted some accommodations made to <br />protect her house and the tall evergreens on the property line, for example putting up a construction fence. <br /> <br />Ms. Margaret Heitz of 335 Marrett Road, a neighbor on the other side of Marrett Road, said she was in <br />agreement with David Langseth’s submission. What was the intent of the new buildings, would they be <br />influenced by the main house and carriage house; would they be tied in together? Was the driveway <br />becoming a street? She had concerns about the landscaping between her house and units 4 & 5, <br />especially if they would be uprooting many trees as it could cause flooding. <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Todd of 345 Marrett Road said if the carriage house was to be completely rebuilt, remove it <br />instead and relocate some of the units there. He was also concerned about spring water flow, which was <br />different from a wet summer water flow. <br /> <br />Mr. Peter Shapiro of 11 Wachusett Drive said the preservation of the main house and carriage house <br />should have a covenant covering the intent to retain the structures. <br /> <br />Faramarz Jamshich of 355 Waltham Street said the concern was water issues and that the Historical <br />Commission wanted the carriage house preserved. <br /> <br />Mr. Waitt asked for the consensus of the Board regarding moving the driveway. The Board members <br />were all in favor of moving the driveway. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.