|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-06-11-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-06-11-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 12:20:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for the Meeting of June 11, 2008 Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Audience Comments: <br />Parvaneh Barakhshan of 355 Waltham Street said the area was just like a wetland three to four months in <br />the winter. The Todd’s house has a spring under it. No one talked to the Waltham abutters regarding this <br />project. <br /> <br />Margaret Heitz of 335 Marrett Road said to notice the size of her house, which is considered large, <br />compared to the units they were proposing to build. She was concerned about the number of cars, number <br />of trips, limiting the number of parking spaces, fire access if cars were not properly parked and drainage <br />in the spring where there is heavy water from the Todd residence spring above them. <br /> <br />Dave Langseth of 29 Wachusett Drive gave out a handout. He said the number one issue was density. <br />They were squeezing the maximum density allowed, four units on this site, which would be too many for <br />the neighborhood as it doubles the 2.2 units per acre to four units per acre. Neighborhood abutters <br />suggested a maximum of eight units. Other issues raised were: <br />?? <br />Common open space; <br />?? <br />A condition that if main house and carriage house were demolished they should be replaced with <br />a forested area; <br />?? <br />Sustainable practices for green buildings and landscaping; <br />?? <br />Impervious surface ratio calculation seemed off; <br />?? <br />Support pedestrian access from Wachusett Drive, did not see the need for a bike path; <br />?? <br />Common open space conveyed to the Town or by deed restriction in perpetuity; and <br />?? <br />Reducing density to an appropriate number. <br />Mr. Hornig said the basic density was the Gross Floor Area (GFA) or the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) rather <br />then the number of units. Mr. Langseth said he had the numbers and would submit them. <br /> <br />Eugene Foley of 365 Waltham Street said the runoff was of great concern. There is surface water 35 to 79 <br />inches below the surface; there was standing water on the eastern edge in late winter; why not connect to <br />the town sewer system. <br /> <br />Mr. Waitt said they were not allowed to tie into the town’s drainage system. Tests were done by certified <br />people and based on soil mottling. Mr. Zurlo asked if they planned on doing additional testing before the <br />definitive plan. Mr. Canale said the Planning Board should have a peer review from an outside firm at the <br />definitive plan stage. Ms. Manz said the Engineering report was not in yet and she would have to take that <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.