|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-06-11-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
2008-06-11-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
1/6/2009 12:20:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of June 11, 2008 <br /> <br />Mr. Waitt agreed that he would love to reduce the pavement, but the policy would need to come from <br />within, not from the applicant. He said they met with approximately a dozen abutters and have been <br />communicating via e-mail with the neighborhood representative. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo wanted to know what the neighbors asked and what was addressed? Mr. Waitt said density was <br />the biggest concern along with views of the backyard, the path and emergency access. The neighbors felt <br />they did not need a path since they could use the historic path at the end of Wachusett. Some abutters felt <br />like part of the property and were not advocating for screening, but rather an attempt to scale back the <br />mass since screening would only add more stuff. Mr. Zurlo said a three dimensional Styrofoam model <br />with the proposed homes and abutters on the topography would show the massing was inappropriate for <br />the area. He felt there was some progress in the stepped units, but that they should seriously think about <br />reducing the number of units. More three-dimensional models should be used early on. What was the <br />proposed height of the porches on units 4 & 5? Mr. Lopez said they would be at grade. Mr. Timm said <br />there would be steps down to the patio or a deck. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo asked how the calculation of the average natural grade was done, and what would it be if it <br />were one structure? Mr. Waitt said he wasn’t sure he wanted to go there; he said Town Meeting allowed <br />the height to be calculated for each individual unit of an attached structure on a downhill slope. Mr. Zurlo <br />asked about the treatment of the carriage house. Mr. Lopez said he was still working on it with the <br />Historical Commission. Mr. Zurlo asked if the goal was to fully replace the cumulative caliper of the trees <br />being removed, and Mr. Waitt said he believed in adding more than taken down. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig asked if they were bringing in gas service. Mr. Waitt said it would be on the definitive plan. <br />Mr. Hornig said he wanted all electric utilities to be underground, including removing all existing above <br />ground utilities from Wachusett Drive to existing homes. How much disturbance would there be for the <br />extension of the water service? Mr. Waitt said approximately 10 feet for the water main and the sewer <br />would be down the middle of the roadway. Mr. Hornig said to explore an historic preservation restriction <br />on the exterior of the two historic houses. He commented that if the parking spaces were for the units <br />they should not be in the common open space. Mr. Waitt said it was for the units and should not be in <br />open space. Mr. Hornig also asked about bicycle access. He suggested that moving units 1-3 and 4-5 <br />closer together and to the west might address issues. He liked the small units, but wanted to do something <br />about the massing and preserve larger trees by making adjustments in units 1-5. Mr. Waitt said he now <br />has a good tree survey; there were many trees leaning and some were dead. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.