Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />Minutes for the Meeting of May 14, 2008 <br />and use stone retaining walls. Mr. Canale asked if waivers would be needed for the top piece. He also <br />wanted to know if there were vacant lots along Robbins Road to Richard Road. Mr. Waitt said he had no <br />idea. Mr. Canale asked if the transition areas were to be paved. Mr. Waitt said yes. Mr. Canale asked the <br />reason for requesting a waiver of the sidewalk. Mr. Waitt said that the existing landscaping was within <br />the right of way and there was no existing sidewalk. Mr. Zurlo asked about waivers for the grade within <br />75 feet of an intersection. Mr. Waitt said that is for new roads, but this is an existing one and it would be <br />impossible to meet that current standard. Mr. Galaitsis said that of the eight waivers being requested, he <br />had no problem with the three concerning the utilities, 2% grade and minimum radius. However, since <br />the remaining waivers save money, he would like to see those savings used to extend the area to be <br />improved. He would also consider paving only a 20-foot width and using those savings for further local <br />improvements, but wanted to hear from residents on the street width issue. Mr. Waitt said there were a <br />variety of opinions from neighbors, some wanted the pavement to be narrower than 20 feet and some <br />wanted the potholes fixed up and down Robbins Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said the transition areas were shown as gravel. Mr. Waitt looked at the plans and said that was <br />correct. He reported that the Engineering Department asked that the basins be reconstructed. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig said the only problem he had was with the last waiver that would allow the retaining wall <br />right at the edge of pavement and within the right of way. He was concerned about the safety. Mr. Waitt <br />said some of the abutters voiced the same concern and had asked if they could try to reduce the width to <br />stay away from the wall. The whole site is on ledge so to move the wall back they would need to blast and <br />then would lose a substantial number of mature trees. Mr. Canale asked if the road was plowed by the <br />Town and Mr. Henry said it was. <br /> <br />Audience Questions and Comments: <br /> <br />Ms. Susan Boer of 56 Robbins Road said if they were concerned about adequacy of the road, why wait <br />until new construction to require improvements. Mr. Hornig said it does not meet 2008 standards, but if <br />they were not looking for a permit, there was not a requirement to improve it. Mr. Zurlo asked if they <br />should address the adequacy of the entire road. Mr. Canale said they were concerned with road along the <br />entire frontage and to the nearest public street. <br /> <br />Ms. Elizabeth Garrels of 11 Plymouth Road, the house at the corner with the boulders, said that the proof <br />plan shows 24 feet and that is what would be needed for more than one house. Mr. Hornig said the <br /> <br />