Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrash and Recycling Task Force TAR-rpt (no date) On behalf of my colleagues on the Trash and Recycling Task Force Selectmen Deb Mauger and Peter Kelley, businessman John Carroll and Sandra Mayo, parent recycling enthusiast, I am pleased to report our recommendations The task Force met 7 times and these meetings included trip to recycling center, observations of curbside pick-up procedures as well as conversation with vendors Among the things we learned is that Lexington is among the communities in the state with the highest recycling rates 12 communities recycle at a higher rate than we do, 10 or these are PAYT communities and two—Nantucket and Wellesley have high specialized municipal programs Having a high recycling rate makes good economic sense Our recycling has significant value We were told that cardboard in the current market is sold for more than $100/ton and that one vendor we spoke to had a contract with Annheiser Busch in New England for recycled aluminum In addition to the value of the recycling which effectively offsets the costs of collection every ton we remove from the trash stream saves us $68 in tipping fees About 5-10%of Lexington households seem to not recycle, that trash is picked-up curbside, but there is no associated recycling left at the curb Consequently, as we considered our options, the task force emphasized choices that both increased recycling and provided more service to both the residents and businesses The charge of the Task Force defined 6 policies we were to consider• 1) Single stream recycling Single stream recycling means comingling containers and paper and relying on the hauler to separate the containers and papers at their facilities The recycling facilities we observed were fairly efficient, but still resulted in some degree of cross contamination lowering the end value of the recycled material We recommend continuing with dual stream recycling as we have now Only communities with low recycling rates see an increase in recycling rates when going to single stream 2) Enhanced waste ban and mandatory recycling As mentioned 5-10 percent of households do not seem to recycle We recommend enforcing the recycling ban through an education program, reminders at the curb and accompanying this change with a reduction on the number of allowed trash barrels Currently 6-32 gallon trash barrels will be picked up each week along with one bulky item We recommend reducing that to 3-32 gallon bags or barrels 3) Automated refuse and recycling systems Automated pick-up refers to use of two standardized totes,the waste vehicle has a platform or arm which grabs the totes and empties it into the truck Totes are an expense, larger than what is now used and would present a storage and transport problem to some residents We recommend continuing with manual pick-up of trash barrels or bags 4) Multi-town regional collection bid—no harm as along as RFP can contain all the items Lexington specifies 5) Additional curbside yard waste collections Currently 12 pick-ups, we recommend the addition of 8 weeks This would allow curbside yard waste pick-up every two weeks from April to September to supplement the weekly fall pick-us and xmas tree pickups 6) Stay with current vendor or go out to bid In last year of a 3 year contract with 2 one year extensions Recommend going out to bid 7) Additional services Curbside collection of rigid plastics e g 5-gallon containers, certain toys Remove carpet from waste stream by requesting that carpet be designated from recycling and picked up curbside by special request as are white goods now, 5-8%of weight of trash attributed to carpet-potential saving of 30 K annually Add housing authority pick-up of trash and recycling-some associated cost of addition trash pick- up, but housing authority are municipal residential units and feel that should be covered under plan Consider as add alternate 8) Future projects–Begin discussion regarding a pilot program to pick-up recycling in the Center business District Tight quarters, recycling as value, eliminate some of the unsightly dumpsters in the parking areas, , if go forward with anaerobic digester will be discussing waste options with business owners Recommendation on whether to dissolve committee-We serve at the consent of the Selectmen, may want us to review RFP and help with education program associated with mandatory recycling ban