Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-03-TAC-minTransportation Advisory Committee Date: August 3, 2010 Members Present: Sara Arnold, Sally Castleman, Elaine Dratch, Bill Levison, Peter Levy Members Absent: Larry Link, Danny Moraff, Francine Stieglitz Liaisons: Nancy Adler - COA Guest: Monica Tibbits, Executive Director, 128 Business Council (128 BC) Staff: Gail Wagner Minutes from TAC Meeting of June 21, 2010 approved. 128 BC Presentation by Monica Tibbits ➢ 128 BC's mission is to reduce traffic congestion along Route 128. Specific efforts: promote SOV reduction (goal 15% to 20% SOV reduction), promote public transit, maintain commuter bus shuttles to and from Alewife MBTA station, maintain car pool data base, provide guaranteed ride home (taxi or car rental: infrequent occurrence — used about 12 times yearly), bike buddy (match bike riders seeking commuting partner). ➢ 128 BC comprised of 40 member companies ranging from small to large. Bus shuttles provided 300,000 rides last year placing it 2 nd or 3 rd behind MBTA in regional commuter volume. ➢ Businesses involved in the Alewife bus shuttle number 15 to 17. ➢ Bus routes run 4 hours in both AM and PM. Due to traffic volume, AM shuttle routinely experiences delays of 10 to 15 minutes. PM routes more predictable. ➢ Shuttle Bus Routes: Alewife Route A (south Lexington and north Waltham), Alewife Route B (Waltham), Windsor Village, Bentley College, South Side Shuttle (includes Riverside MBTA, Brandeis). Shuttle serviced by 4 buses, but expansion to 5 or 6likely. ➢ Bus contractors: M &Land Locomotion. ➢ Shuttle bus is most effective in reducing traffic with car pools ranked second. ➢ Van pools are not prevalent. Total van pool count is 6 or 7. ➢ Reverse commute from Lexington for residents to Alewife is possible. Shuttles open to the public for $5 fare per ride. Ideal stop would be south Spring St, last stop prior to Alewife return. Note: Public parking on private property not supported by businesses in South Lexington to date. ➢ New directions by Ms. Tibbits: improved website, GPS tracking, traffic cam, LEED certification guidance (TMA participation counts for LEED points). ➢ MBTA has been contacted to expand service along Hartwell Avenue. ➢ Staff composition: executive director, operations director (manages shuttles), TMA program manager. ➢ Consultants are used for marketing and pricing. Pricing is most important to a successful TMA and is guarded as a trade secret. ➢ 128 BC has a Board of Directors composed of 10 members primarily developers and real estate professionals. No new member in past 7 or 8 years. Looking to expand membership with inclusion of community representation, CDCs (Community Development Councils ?) and environmental justice advocates. ➢ Current 3 tier membership fees: developers (based on square footage); employers (total number of employees); associate (amalgam of developers and employer scales). A simplified membership funding system is being developed. ➢ If the value of town membership in 128 BC cannot be justified, periodic community forums are being considered as a method to increase community involvement. ➢ 128 BC bylaws are being updated. State TMA information presented by Monica Tibbits ➢ TMA participation is encouraged through special permitting process. ➢ MA has ten (10) TMAs. Most TMAs operate as non - profits. ➢ Bus shuttles are run by 3 or 4 of the total state TMAs. ➢ Range of TMA activities vary by location. ➢ Developers should carry major TMA cost. ➢ Cost of shuttle bus subsidy must match the ridership. Costs need to be corrected accordingly. ➢ Ideas for companies to reduce SOVs: telecommuting, flex time, subsidizing shuttles, gift card incentives, limiting parking spaces, payment for transit passes, joining TMA. ➢ Oversight of companies is a big component. Towns enforce TMA participation, not TMA. ➢ Incentives to meet targets good TMA policy. ➢ Companies need to live up to TDM obligations, especially by encouraging employees to reduce SOV dependency. Hartwell Avenue Overlay TDM District comments by TAC ➢ TMA policy should include specifics. ➢ 128 BC list of member services will be refined. TAC example " SOV reduction incentives." ➢ Steps to develop TMA should be outlined. ➢ Developers' financial backing of TMA needs to be addressed. ➢ TAC members' comments should be emailed to Peter Levy who will incorporate into a statement to be presented to the Planning Board in early September. Cranberry Hill Contribution to Lexpress ➢ Vote taken and motion passed for a letter based on calendar year 2010 to be sent to Cranberry Hill Associates regarding a voluntary donation. ➢ The donation is based on Lexpress service to the front door of Lahey Lexington (property owned by Cranberry Hill) eight times per day. Lexpress provides the only public transit service in this section of Lexington. Lexpress FY10 Data ➢ Total ridership is down by 2,238 from FY09. ➢ Drop in student riders is the most significant loss. ➢ Seniors, as in the past years, represent the biggest gain by category. Lexpress FY12 Budget Bill distributed handouts tracking TDM allocation and Lexpress FY 12 costs. Handouts Agenda TAC Minutes June 21, 2010 FY06 -FY 10 Lexpress Annual Data TDM Appropriation FYI Time - Limited Lexpress Accounts TDM Stabilization Formula Lexpress FYI I -FY12 Budget % Recorder: Gail Wagner Editor: Bill Levison