HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-12-14-CPC-min
Community Preservation Committee
Monday, December 14, 2009
3:30 pm
G-15
Town Offices
Present:
Betsey Weiss, Chair; Joel Adler, Norman Cohen, Marilyn Fenollosa, Vice
Chair; Jeanne Krieger, Wendy Manz, Leo McSweeney, Nathalie Rice, Admin. Asst;
Sandy Shaw, and Dick Wolk. Mr. David Kanter of the Capital Expenditures Committee
(CEC) was also in attendance.
Ms. Weiss called the meeting to order at 3:05 pm.
The purpose of the meeting was to take straw votes on the 21 projects under
consideration by the CPC for CPA funding, and to conduct other matters of CPC
business.
1.Appraisal Policy Approval of Final Changes
- -The Committee discussed the
Appraisal Policy, and a motion was made to insert the word, “first” before the
phrase, “session of the Town Meeting or Special Town Meeting at which a real
estate acquisition is to be considered.” The vote on this motion failed, (2-6). Ms.
Fenollosa asked that the word, “fewer” be used instead of the words, “less than”,
but the Committee did not approve this suggested change. The policy statement
remained as drafted, and was approved by the Committee with a 5-3 vote.
2.Financial Policy Discussion
- The Committee briefly discussed bonding
th
scenarios for the Busa debt service in preparation for a meeting on December 16
with Mr. Rob Addelson, Assistant Town Manager of Finance, Mr. Carl Valente,
Town Manager, and the two finance committees.
3. Approval of Minutes
-Minutes from 2009 were approved; 5/5, 5/5
Informational Session, 5/6 Caucus, 9/14, 10/26, 11/2, 11/5, 11/12, 11/12 (with the
AC, BOS and CEC)
4.Town Report
- Mr. David Tabling took a photo of the CPC for the Town Report.
Ms.Weiss said she was reviewing a near final draft of the Town Report and would
be sending it to the Committee for final approval before submitting it to the
Selectmen.
5.Hancock School Condominium Project
- Ms. Susan McLeish, President of the
Hancock School Condominium Association and Mr. Scott Robins, representing
1
the Association, met with the CPC to discuss their amended application for the
restoration of the roof and windows on the historic Hancock School Building. Ms.
McLeish explained that the Historic District Commission (HDC) had told the
Association that the HDC prefers a slate roof for the building, but that they would
accept a rubber roof substitute under a hardship situation. The lifespan of a slate
roof is 100 years, while a rubber roof is expected to last only 40 years. The
Association is requesting $255,000 in CPA funding under a revised application.
Their initial request was for $250,000. There was considerable discussion of the
three types of roofing, and whether CPA funding was appropriate for such a
project. While Ms. Fenollosa felt strongly that the project had valuable historic
merit, Mr. Wolk questioned whether approving CPA funding would set a
precedent for restoring privately-owned historic buildings that were underinsured.
Members discussed the building’s historic value/public benefit versus using CPA
funds for the restoration of a private structure. Members did seem to agree that the
project would be very difficult to defend on the floor of Town Meeting.
Ms. McLeish then described the revision to the window estimates. The amount of
the requested appropriation had been reduced from $220,000 to $100,000 with the
recent receipt of a more detailed estimate from their contractor. In response to a
question from the Committee, Ms. McLeish explained that the cost of just
repairing the existing wood frame windows was $84,000. She said the
Association felt it would not be cost effective to repair drafty windows, and
therefore prepared an application to the CPC for energy efficient wood clad
windows for the proposed $100,000. The HDC, Ms. McLeish noted, would not
allow metal frame windows. There was a lengthy discussion of the guidelines
imposed by the HDC, and the impact of those restrictions on the project. Again,
there was a general sense that the window portion of this project would raise a
great deal of debate on the floor of Town Meeting.
6.Bikeway Preservation Project Update
- Ms. Peggy Enders and Mr. Stewart
Kennedy of the Bicycle Advisory Committee were in attendance for this
discussion. Ms. Rice updated the Committee on the progress of the Bikeway
project, explaining that Mr. Livsey, the Town Engineer, was pursuing the project
with Town Counsel. Mr. Livsey believes that the elements of the project in the
CPC request were never originally designed into the Bikeway, particularly the
drainage work. He feels the proposed work is preservation in nature, not
maintenance. He will itemize the proposed work in the CPC application for Town
Counsel in order to make this distinction clear. Once this additional information is
submitted to Town Counsel, it is Mr. Livsey’s belief that the project will be found
eligible.
7.Greeley Village Project Update
- Ms. Weiss updated the Committee on the
progress of the Greeley Village project, stating that Mr. Steve Keane,
Maintenance Superintendent, was working on an amended application. The initial
2
application for CPA funds for the repair of bathrooms, was deemed ineligible by
Town Counsel. Mr. Keane is proposing a new project for Greeley Village –
drainage improvements outside the units to eliminate flooded basements. Mr.
Keane has talked to Ms. Karen Mullens, Director of Community Development,
regarding the necessary Conservation Commission review and permitting for
directing surface runoff into the storm drain system.
8.Cultural Resources Survey Supplemental Appropriation
- - Ms. Fenollosa
explained that the Historic Commission wished to slightly increase its requested
funding to $5,300 from $5,000 to accommodate the necessary advertising costs
for the project. The Committee supported this request. Ms. Fenollosa informed the
Committee that Lexington has been formally selected to apply for the MHC grant,
for which the Historic Commission was seeking CPA funding.
9.Straw Votes on Projects –
Ms. Weiss called for a straw vote on the projects
where there was sufficient information to take a vote. The votes are recorded
below:
a.Minuteman Bikeway Preservation$320,000(9-0)
-
b.Stormwater Mitigation Old Reservoir/Marrett Road – $190,047 (9-0)
c.Center Playfields Drainage – Implementation Phase – $875,173 (9-0)
.
d.Greeley Village/Vynebrook Projects – $386,129 (9-0)
e.Vynebrook Village Drainage Project – Design Study – $10,000 (9-0)
f.LexHAB Purchase of Two Properties– $695,000 (7-1-1)
g.Archives and Records Management/Records Conservation – $150,000
(9-0)
h.Cary Library Preservation Project – Archives – $100,000 (9-0)
i.Cary Memorial Building – Venue Improvements Study – $30,000 (9-0)
j.Cary Memorial Building Signage – $25,000 (6-2-1)
k.Building Envelope – $73,000 (9-0)
l.Town Office Building Renovation – $1,933,947 (not a final number)
(6-2-1)
3
m.Cary Memorial Building/TOB HVAC Controls Upgrade – $35,000
(9-0)
n.Police Station Ventilation System – $31,700 (8-1)
o.Muzzey Senior Center Improvements Stud– $45,100 (8-1)
y
p.White House Historic Structures Report – $18,000 (6-3)
q.Stone Building Exterior Renovatio– $202,933 (9-0
n )
r.Munroe Tavern Capital Improvements – $400,000 (8-0-1)
s.Comprehensive Cultural Resource Survey – Supplemental
Appropriation - $5,300 (9-0)
t.Battle Green Master Plan – $25,000 (7-2)
u.Busa Debt Service – TBD (9-0)
v.Administrative Fees – $150,000 (9-0)
w.Land Acquisition – (no vote)
x.Cotton Farm Land Acquisition – (no vote)
The meeting was adjourned at 5:43 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Nathalie Rice
Administrative Assistant
Community Preservation Committee
4