HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-01-03-PB-minPLANNING BOARD MINUTES
MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 2001
The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, was
called to order at 7: 30 p.m. by Chairman Colman with members Chase, Davies, Galaitsis, Planning
Director Garber, and Assistant Planner McCall - Taylor present. Ms. Bridge - Denzak was absent.
Members of the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee (CPAC) present were Larry Belvin, Tom De
Noto, Elaine Dratch, Marilyn Fenollosa, Tom Harden, Fred Johnson, Karl Kastorf, Jeanne Krieger,
Wendy Manz, and Joe Marino. Also present were Phil Herr, consultant to the Planning Board, Robert
Cohen, candidate for the Planning Board, and Susan Fisher from the local paper.
* * * * * * * * * * **
ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * **
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
41 Lincoln Street Definitive Subdivision Plan, Ronald Lopez, Endorse Plans The Planning Board signed
plans for the approved 41 Lincoln Street Definitive Subdivision Plan. These are the correct version of the
plans that they voted to endorse and sign at their meeting of November 29, 2000.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Meeting with Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee All in attendance introduced themselves and
Mr. Garber gave a brief background on Philip Herr, who is the consultant hired to assist in the drafting of
the comprehensive plan.
Organizational Options — Mr. Herr gave a brief description of his view of the comprehensive planning
process. He stated that the most common method is to hire someone to produce a product that a planning
board reacts to. The other extreme is having a group of volunteers pull together information for a
professional staff. He proposes neither model. Instead he will draw on the work of the 2020 group with
the planning staff doing some "heavy lifting ". Material will be prepared in conjunction with residents. It
will be important to . make connections across topics or planning elements. For this reason Mr. Herr wants
to designate resource people rather than sub - groups. Mr. Garber said that topics provide something to
coalesce around and would utilize people's interests. Mr. Colman quoted Steven Covey who has said that
one must plan with the end in mind. Mr. Colman expects to produce a non - traditional plan, as well as one
that will actually be used. Mr. Herr agreed and said that his view of what a good comprehensive plan is a
statement of intentions rather than a description of the way things are or will be. He warned that if a plan
is put together with an inappropriate process there is nothing that can be done to save it. Mr. Garber
stated that he thought of the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee (CPAC) as a quick sounding
board for policy proposals. This will be done through e -mail, quick meetings and some deeper research.
Mr. Garber asked that the CPAC members let the planners know where their interests lie and the staff
would form constant sounding boards. Mr. Colman characterized Mr. Herr's role as a guide taking staff
and CPAC somewhere they've never gone before.
Ideas Blitz —Mr. Garber explained that this portion of the meeting was designed to be a very loose, quick
churning of the ground with more ideas and objectives identified than could be explored in a year. The
intent of this discussion is less technical analysis than it is a clarification of what people want and how
these objectives can be achieved. Mr. Colman cited mansionization as an example. He said atraditional
plan would say the town discourages mansionization, cite some figures and stop there. He wants
strategies and tools. Among ideas brought forward were parking issues, mansionization, housing
affordability and sustainability. The parking structure can serve as a catalyst for a discussion of what
people really want the center to be. In the field of housing, where affordability has been seen as important
but is no longer in the forefront, the planning process might explore how deep the support goes. With
natural resources, sustainability is a cross cutting theme. Mr. Herr said that a document will be produced
Minutes for the Meeting of January 3, 2001 2
which will be short and available everywhere. The comprehensive plan should drive quickly toward
general ideas and how they are going to be addressed.
Larry Belvin raised the idea of having a second developer on CPAC, someone who is a Lexington
resident and has done special permit work. The sense of the Planning Board was that it was a good idea.
There had been some concern about getting too large a group but given the attendance rate, this should
not be a problem.
***************COORDINATION WITH OTHER BOARDS, COMMITTEES * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Community Preservation Act Update Mr. Colman had appeared before the Board of Selectmen to discuss
the Community Preservation Act. A committee will be appointed to explore local adoption of the
Community Preservation Act. Mr. Davies nominated Mr. Colman to serve as the Planning Board's
representative.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ARTICLES FOR 2001 TOWN MEETING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Mr. Garber distributed a capsule description of the five zoning articles that will be presented at the 2001
Town Meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PLANNING BOARD ORGANIZATION, SCHEDULE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
The Board outlined the meeting and public hearing schedule for the next two months. The next meeting
with the CPAC will be February 13, 2001.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
Sara B. Chase, Acting Clerk