Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-10-BOS-min �r SELECTMEN'S MEETING N\ ( October 7, 1985 p A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, October 7, 1985, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Office Building, at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Marshall', Mr. McLaughlin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey; Mr. Hutchinson, Town Manager; Mr. Cohen, Town Counsel; Ms. Adler, Assistant to the Town Manager; Mrs. Snow, Executive Clerk, were present. Mrs. Judith Marshall, President of the League of Women Voters, was L.W.V. present for discussion of the Hazardous Household Waste Collection, initi- Hazardous ated by the League and scheduled for October 19th. Waste Mrs. Marshall informed the Board that although collection costs in Collection previous years had been only slightly over the amount appropriated, it has been evidenced by bids received for this year's collection that the deficit will be fairly substantial. She noted that a State program for funding of such projects now exists, but that the amount to be awarded would not be known until late winter. She asked for sources of town funding in the inter- im to allow for payment to the collection firm. She reported on increased awareness of townspeople of the waste collection, although full participation has not been attained as yet. Continuance of the $4 .00 fee for amounts over 5 gallons, is anticipated. Mr. Hutchinson said that funds for a short term transfer would be avail- able in the Operating Account, Refuse Collection, going then to either the upcoming Special Town Meeting or the 1986 Annual Town Meeting. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve provision of additional funding for the 1985 Hazardous Household Waste Collection. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve minutes of Minutes the Selectmen's Meeting on September 9, 1985, as presented. Mr. McLaughlin, 9/9/85 absent from that meeting, abstained from voting. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to call a Special Town Special Tow] Meeting on December 2, 1985, in Cary Memorial Hall at 8:00 p.m. Mtg. 12/2 Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to close the Warrant for the Special Town Meeting on October 21 , 1985, at 4 :30 p.m. Warrant John Maloney, representing the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee, was T.S.A.C. present for review of that Committee's reports to the Selectmen on traffic Reports items. The Committee's recommendations on Robert Trask's suggested "no left Turn" regulation at the Dunkin Donuts exit on Marrett Road was reviewed. The Trask, dommttee had concurred that although traffic from and to Dunkin Donuts can Dunkin Donut cause problems at that corner, banning left turns would be unworkable. The committee felt that the ongoing caution exercised by drivers regularly using the intersection would be the only viable option. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommenda- tions ecommenda- tions of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee to deny the request of Robert Trask. It was agreed that additional enforcement of traffic laws at the Waltham S treet/Marrett Road intersection will be requested. The report on the request of Arra Yaghi cyan to allow left turns from the Yeghiayan Rte. 2 exit ramp near Spring Street, to Concord Avenue, was reviewed. Rte. 2 ramp Spring S t. •.... • /51 -2- Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommenda- tions of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee that the Massachusetts D.P.W. be asked to implement a provision to allow left turns from the eastbound Route 2 exit ramp at Concord Avenue. sow Vinger The Board then reviewed the Committee's recommendation on the request of Waltham St. Paul F. Vinger, M.D. , Lexington Eye Associates, for extension of parking meter Meters limit in front of his Waltham Street offices from one hour to two hours , to accommodate patients who are infirm or who have lengthy appointments with the doctors. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommenda- tion of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee that the request of Dr. Vinger for extended parking meter limit on Waltham Street be referred to the Center Revitalization committee for review. North St. The report of the Committee on concerns expressed by North Street resi- residents dents about the impact of truck and auto traffic on the section of North Street nearest the Burlington line. The residents' petition for ban of trucking generated by sand and gravel operations in Burlington, was explored by the Committee. It was found that since no suitable alternate route exists , this request cannot be approved. The Committee concluded that aside from increased volume to traffic of all types and possible speed limit violations, a problem could not be identified on North Street. The Committee recommended increased police monitoring for speed- ing, only. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommenda- tions of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee with respect to the petition of residents of North Street, dated July 30, 1985. The Town Manager will confer with the Police Chief and with the Roberto Trucking Company on the matter. WO Mr. McLaughlin, noting the narrow pavement width of North Street in that area, requested that the road be measured and that information be provided. Committee The remaining annual committee appointments were considered. appts. Regarding reappointments to the Energy Conservation Committee, question Energy Cons. arose as to the need for its continuance. The Town Manager was asked to sub- mit his recommendations on that issue. P. A. B. The Manager's staff will also contact members of the Personnel Advisory Board regarding willingness of three members whose terms are expiring to con- tinue to serve. Police With reference to reappointments to the Police Manual Policy Committee, Manual Mr. McLaughlin reported that there had been no issues arising which had required convening of that committee in recent years, but that he was in favor of keeping the committee in existence to deal with needs which may develop. He recommended reappointment of the current members and calling a meeting in the near future. Members will be contacted as to their willingness to accept reappointment. Trans. Adv. Mr. Eddison, Selectman liaison to the Transportation ,Advisory Committee, Comm. noted the hard work and expertise of the committee and recommended reappoint- ment of the three members whose terms are expiring. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to reappoint the following to the Transportation Advisory Committee, for terms of office to expire on wmi September 30, 1988: Selectmen's Meeting October 7, 1985 0 Y1 , -3- rommi Joyce Hals 14 Vinebrook Road Elaine Dratch 2 Maureen Road Webb Sussman 37 Peacock Farm Road Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to reappoint Kerry Appt. to Brandin, 117 Shade Street, to the Lexington Council for the Arts, for a Arts term of office to expire on September 30, 1987. Council Appointments to the Hazardous Substances Sytem Review Committee were Hazardous deferred pending interviews of applicants and recommendations from the Substances Board of Health and Fire Chief. Committee Regarding the designation of length of terms and appointments/reappoint- CATV Comm. ments to the Cable Television Advisory Committee, Mr. McLaughlin said that recommendations of the Committee Chairman, John Ward, will be forthcoming. He saw a need for revision of the charge to the committee relative to current issues and for a review of membership criteria. Discussion of these matters was tentatively scheduled for October 21. The Town Treasurer, James Kane, was present and requested approval by Bond Anti- the Board of the sale of Bond Anticipation Notes relative to the purchase of ciption the Chiesa land (Article 3 1985 May S.T.M.) and the West Farm land (Article 2, Notes 1985 May S.T.M.) , and execution of the 28 notes and relevant documents. Chiesa & Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the sale of West Farm $1,770,000 Bonad Anticipation Notes of the Town dated October 9, 1985, Cons.Land payable July 7, 1986, at par and accrued interest plus the premiums as listed by the Town Treasurer. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted that the provisions of G.L.c.44, 26 and 27 shall not apply to this issue of notes and it is hereby confirmed that the Treasurer has solicited proposals for the notes from at least three financial institutions. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to confirm the consent dated October 3, 1985, to the certifying bank bidding for these notes. Chairman Jean Gaudet and members Hays, Wilson, Eagle and Edmonds of the LexHAB Lexington Housing Assistance Board were present for a report on Muzzey Muzzey High Condo tenancy in the ten Town-owned units. tenancy Mrs. Gaudet, who had submitted a listing of tenants, asked that it not be publicly disclosed. The tenant application and selection processes were reviewed. Mrs. Gau- det reported that each member had reviewed and scored the 120 applications received using the eligibility guidelines. Mrs. Gaudet noted that 9 persons/ families chosen as tenants rejected the offer of a unit. At present, LexHAB is housing a total of 24 persons in the ten Muzzey High Condo units. Of these four are Section 8 persons/families; 2 are minority families; there is an age range of from 2 to 75 years of age; 3 are single parent households; 2 are handicapped persons. Eight of the ten have strong Lexington connections; two have had no previous Lexington connection. She reported that on a recent tour of the units by LexHAB members, all tenants seemed very content with their quarters. She pointed out that the large proportion of one-bedroom units in the ten town-awned units had proven to be too high and that more two- and three- bedroom units should have been selected. mot It was noted that redesign of the Franklin School interior plans to pro- vide a higher percentage of two and three hedroom units is underway. The Town Manager will provide information on the ratio. Mr. Marshall said that he saw the Muzzey selection process as a very open one and asked about procedures for filling vacancies as they occur. Mrs. Gaudet said that in addition to the remaining original applications, more are being received and that all will be kept on file. Mr. Hays noted that if the pool becomes unrepresentative of various groups, the application process will be restarted. Regarding the selection guidelines established by the Selectmen, Mrs. Gaudet reported that had been a great aid if the difficult task of evaluating the applications. Mr. Hays added that the Town was well served by the Selectmen's approval and insistence on an assets test and that it had been very helpful in estab- lishing need. The selection process for buyers of the other condominiums was reported on briefly. Of the occupants, there are four town employees, but no minorities. Mrs. Gaudet said all seem to agree that Muzzey is a great community and are very pleased. Mr. Marshall reported that a dedication is being planned for this Fall or early Winter. Regarding the financial picture, Mr. Eagle pointed out that the 90-day note for $250,000, in anticipation of funds from Potter Pond developers, will be due on November 7. Mr. Marshall recommended that the developers be strongly urged to pay now. Mr. Eagle suggested that the note could be renewed for another 90-day period with the expectation of receiving the Potter Pond money by then. Board members concurred with this course of action and agreed that the prob- lem should be resolved with Smith/Boyd (Potter Pond developers) . They were strongly opposed to seeking permanent funding. LexHAB was commended by the members, who agreed that Muzzey is an out- standing success, largely due to that Board's efforts. Mrs. Gaudet acknowledged that it had been a difficult year for her Board, due to the process of setting up a structure which was complex and caused delays with tenanting Muzzey but, now that this has been accomplished, procedures should be easier in the future. Possible involvement of LexHAB in the Franklin School selection process was brought up. Street Mr. Hutchinson presented revised draft street criteria, modified as a criteria result of his meeting with Mrs. Battin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Tonaszuck and Planning Director Mr. Bowyer. He read the draft, distributed to the Board that evening. Mr. Eddison felt that the Manager had done a good job of incorporating suggestions made at the meeting and that progress was being made, but recommended that time be allowed for thorough review of the draft before a final vote is taken. It was agreed that action will be taken on October 21st. In review of the draft, Mr. McLaughlin referred to Item #5 "Design construc- tion guidelines for construction of unpaved streets", which requires that street construction guidelines be consistent with Planning Board subdivision rules. mr0 Selectmen's Meeting October 7, 1985 Ommi He felt that there should be an indication that some flexibility is possible in decisions to be made by the Selectmen and that the Board should not be locked into Planning Board standards without some mechanism for variances. Discusion on the draft will be continued on October 21st. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve renewal of Battle Greer Battle Green Guide license for Stuart Lustig, 40 Marrett Road, and the Guides approve a new license for David Kealey, 5 Brigham Circle. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve a One Day 1-day Liq. Liquor License for a fundraising function at the Armenian Sisters Academy, Lic.Armeniar. 20 Pelham Road, on October 19, 1985. Sisters Acac Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the request Cary Library of Robert C. Hilton, Director of the Cary Memorial Library, for permission reception- to serve wine punch at a reception to be held at the library on December 6. wine servicE Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the resig- C. Siegel nation of Carol Siegel from the Lexington Council for the Arts, effective resign. as of October 2, 1985. Arts Council Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve abatement Sewer User of Sewer User Charges in the total amount of $1,201.85, for properties not Charges connected to Town Sewer and therefore exempt from the charge-and in the abated amount of $55.00, due to incorrect meter reading by the property owner. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve a 30-day Sick leave sick leave for Philip Silva, Dept. of Public Works employee, as recommended extended, by the Town Manager. Silva Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve submittal Crosswalk to the State DPW of a request for installation of a crosswalk at Bedford St. Bedford St. and Worthen Rd. Worthen Rd. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the Manag- Traffic er's referral of a request for installation of a traffic light at either light -Reed, Hill or Reed Street on Bedford Street to the Traffic Safety Advisory Commit- and/or Hill tee for review and recommendations. to T.S.A.C. Regarding the Hotel/Motel tax, the Manager recommended that adoption Hotel/Motel be deferred, but that it be listed as another alternative available to assist tax in dealing with the limitations of Prop. 2 1/2. He is contacting other com- munities for information on their views on adoption. He asked for direction from the Board on the issue. In answer to Mr. Dailey, Mr. Hutchinson said he felt that the tax is not needed at this time and that it would be an additional business tax. Mr. Dailey said he felt it would not be a diservice to businesses and noted the many services provided to industry. He asked if a question could Pima be taken to Town Meeting, asking autority for the Selectmen to impose the iG ��6 r I)) tax if warranted. The matter will again be discussed at a subsequent meeting. Handicapped Status of the handicapped ramp at Cary Hall was discussed. Mr. Hutchin- ramp, Cary son reported that bids received far exceed the appropriation of $60,000, and that there is some reluctance among contractors to become involved in the ' ino work because of its size and many different demands i.e. State requirements, Historic Distric Commission jurisdiction. - The Manager recommended requesting the Special Town Meeting for additional funding. The matter will be discussed further on October 21st. Storm Regarding brush removal procedures following hurricane Gloria, the Manager clean-up asked authority to keep the Lincoln Street area open through October 14, for dumping of brush by residents. , Motion was made and seconded to allow dumping of brush at the Lincoln Street area through October 14. In discussion, Mr. Eddison expressed support for this measure but felt it might be necessary to allow dumping of brush for an even longer period. The motion carried. Mr. Eddison questioned whether the Town should be doing more to assist elderly and those who are not able to tie branches in bundles for trash col- lection. He felt the Town may not be as responsive as it could be with respect to hardship cases. Mr. McLaughlin felt that the provisions were adequate. Mr. Marshall said he was not in favor of Town clean-up of private property. Mr. Dailey felt that other Town projects preclude giving priority to such special Town details. He agreed with Mr. McLaughlin who saw progress with the clean-up. Under special circumstances, he urged that the Manager give Con- sideration of assistance, but said he would not support funding of a special contract for clean-up. war Mr. Hutchinson advised discussing extension of time at Lincoln Street on October 21st. Appreciation Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to request the Manager to DPW,Fire to prepare a letter to D.P.W. , and the Fire and Police Departments, conveying & Police the appreciation of the Board for outstanding service through and following the hurricane emergency. Exec.Sess. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 4 - 0 by roll call vote, Mr. Marshall, Mr- McLaughlin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey, to go into Executive Session for discussion of land acquisition, with no intent to resume open session. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. A true record, Attest: qlP'W‘ i2L,464) „„di M rion H. Snow Executive Clerk 111\ /Ac\li. SELECTMEN'S MEETING 4-1\0\ i ' .' October 21, 1985 A regular meeting—of the Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, October 21, 1985, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Marshall, Mrs. Bat- tin, Mr. McLaughlin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey; Mr. Hutchinson, Town Manager; Mr. Cohen, Town Counsel; Ms. Adler, Assistant to the Town Manager; Mrs. Snow, Executive Clerk, were present. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it wa8 voted to accept the minutes of Minutes Selectmen's Meetings on the following dates, as presented: September 9 (Execu- 9/9,9/23, tive Session) , September 23, and October 7, 1985. 10/7/85 Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept with regret Resignation resignations of the following, effective immediately: Shunney & Robert Koff, 18 Demar Road Lexington Council for the Arts Koff Mary E. Shunney, 24 Revere Street Personnel Advisory Board The appreciation of the Board will be expressed to Mrs. Shunney and Mr. Koff for their service to the Town while members of these committees. Senator Kraus was present for discussion of pending and new legislation Senator and their effect on Lexington. Kraus Regarding the proposed Tax Cut, the Senator reported that the House favors a sur-tax cut in three years and the Senate has asked for the cut in one year. He noted a deep division between the two houses but felt that passage of the ems bill is a certainty. In response to a request for information on the impact to Lexington from loss of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds, the Town Manager said $250,000 would be lost the first year with a loss of $500,_00/year thereafter. There was brief discussion of future Town coverage of all (or at least all new) employees for Medicare and the proposal that all State and municipal employees join Social Security and the implications of those measures. Senator Kraus said that the tax cut at the State level would be accommo- dated by cuts in Local Aid and education funding and that the State would be allowed no increased spending of its own. He distributed an informational sheet which gave data since 1981 on Sending in Billions - State vs. Local (Regional School, Cities, Towns) and one on Estimated Revenue Changes for Fiscal 1987. Mr. McLaughlin said he felt that the sur-tax should be repealed and that falling oil prices suggested that the gasoline tax should be looked at again. He said that the state tax on unearned income primarily helped banks within Massachusetts, not people. In response to questions, Senator Kraus stated that he had no adequate answer as to why State government operating costs are greater than those at the local level. Regarding salary increases for State employees, he gave an esti- mate of 5 to 6%, noting that he did not have current figures on municipal raises. He felt, however, that increases on the local level are roughly in that ball- park. Regarding the Pension Reform legislation, the Senator said that if it passes, the State would assume the liability of $12 to $13 billion dollars, covering all state and local employees, about half of whom are teachers. He questioned how, in the light of the proposed tax cut, the State can handle this funding. Frank Parrish, Chairman of the Retirement Board, commented that this pro- posal would bail out other municipalities which have high liabilities when 7-„, -2- Lexington has been funding its liability. He stated that Lexington still has an unfunded liability of $11 million dollars. The Senator said he represents one of the few districts, including mow Lexington, Arlington and Winchester which have been funding their lia- bilities and that he is sensitive to the problem. The Manager added that 90% of communities will be joining the system and that Lexington should look into it. The Senator pointed 'out that a fair amount of the expense to the State would be moved off into the future. He said he -doubted enactment this year or next and felt that the Legislators would most likely move on the bill in pieces. Recent handicapped legislation which opens barriers for the handicapped, was discussed. As stated in his letters to Senator Kraus and Representative Doran, the Town Manager voiced his opposition to the requirement that the handicapped be hired for public safety jobs. He said he does not believe that this practice meets legislative intent and suggested that the statute be amended to exempt public safety personnel, adding that the public has the right to have the most physically fit personnel that it can attract to provide public safety. He felt that it would be poor policy to hire people with a physical illness, even if controlled, f or public safety positions such as police and firefighters. The impact of long-term disability pensions which would result on Town finances was also noted. Rep.Doran Representative Doran, delayed by his attendance at a House meeting, joined the meeting at this time. Regarding changes in Dog Hearing procedures, he in- formed the Board that legislation filed by him at the request of Town Meeting will be going to hearing the following week and will be signed into legislation. Regarding Land Bank legislation, he said it would be debated in the House, but felt it would go to the Senate by the next week and that elements are present for its passage. Under this legislation the Town, at its option, could , 1.0 impose a tax of up to 2% on real estate transactions. He distributed copies to the Board of a summary on Pension Liability, "Funding, Improving and Reforming Public Employee Pension Benefits", prepared by the Executive Office for Administration and Finance. Representative Doran referred to the Hotel/Motel Tax option, noting the Manager's mixed feelings regarding Town adoption. He suggested that it be included in the warrant for the Special Town Meeting for discussion. Binding Arbitration legislation was briefly referenced. Representative Doran said he saw nothing happening in the House. Senator Kraus noted reports that the Mass. Municipal Association is considering some type of binding arbi- tration which it could support. The Senator and Representative were thanked for their input and the infor- mation they had provided and they retired from the meeting. N.Lex. Mr. Eddison noted the cooperation and efforts of the North Lexington Road Road Impr. Improvement Study Committee and Town and BSC engineers in the process of develop- Bedford St.ment of alternate plans for Bedford Street construction. He introduced Mr. Bur- nell, Chairman of the Committee, and other members present. Mr. Burnell said the Committee had gone through the extensive process with BSC of incorporating the Committee's recommendations in the concept plan. He stated teh Committee's unanimous recommendation that the BSC plan be accepted, adding that all issues seem to have been addressed. i-3- Selectmen's Meeting October 21, 1985 omit Richard Cooke of BSC Engineering presented an evaluation of the Commit- tee's recommendations, as shown on the new plan. Included in the revised plan were the following features: • Elimination of the frontage road from Eldred Street to the Armory, replacing with a green belt which can support heavy screening to abuttors . The opening, with channelization, of the median of Bedford Street at Eldred Street with proposed signalization to provide for access and egress to the. neighborhood. . A one-way access road to those homes fronting on Bedford Street at Eldred Street between the Rte: 128 Ramp and Eldred Street for 'safety egress. . A pedestrian signal and crosswalk at Bedford Street in the vicinity of the median U-turn. Mr. Cook felt that an improved situation had been protided to residents, which may not be the best plan for accommodating through traffic, but which represents a compromise concept. He stated the following as issues which must be addressed with State and Federal Agencies: . the signal at Eldred Street PUNK . ramp relocation - construction within interstate highway location . connection to Ivan Street Mr. Burnell added that the Committee feels strongly that to gain State approval of the new aspects of the design, input of the Committee will be needed to convince officials of the importance of the plan to residents of the area. The Committee will meet with the State in November and he asked for more detailed drawings to aid in the presentation. Discussion will take place regard- ing extension of the Town's property lines to allow Town control of landscaping of the buffer strip and median strip. Mr. Eddison suggested that a November 19th meeting with the State would allow time for further refinements to the drawings and asked the Board's support for the new plan. Motion was made and seconded to endorse the compromise plan for Bedford Street improvements and to request the Town Engineer and BSC Engineering to prepare detailed designs for presentation to State and Federal officials. The Town Manager was requested to provide information on the amount of funding necessary for completion of the drawings and for ongoing maintenance of the green areas. In response to Mrs. Battin, Mr. Burnell stated that neither the business community nor the Planning Board have had a formal presentation of the plans, although Larry Smith, President of the Chamber of Commerce and a member of the Committee, is in favor of the plans. Mr. McLaughlin said he was impressed with the progress made and supported going forward with the plans. offssa Mr. Marshall complimented Mr. Eddison, the Committee, the Town Manager, and Town Engineer for their efforts. 11) Mr. Burnell said that the Board's selection of such appropriate and knowledgable committee members had made the job easier. He was optimistic about State and Federal approval of plans. He anticipated that by the first of March, 1986, the 25% design would be ready for presentation to the State, mod with a two-year period to final drawing and start of construction. He esti- mated completion in 1991 or 1992. Motion having been duly made and seconded, it was voted to endorse the compromise plan and authorize preparation by Town and BSC engineers of road plans for presentation to State and Federal agencies. Mr. Burnell said the Committee, which will continue to function, will present the plans to the North Lexington Association in November, prior to the meeting with the State. Abatement Eric Kula, Pleasant Brook Pool Corporation, was present to request recon- request sideration of the Board's denial of his February '85 request for abatement of Kula sewer user charges related to the pool. He recapped events briefly. In 1983 a pool leak developed and became more apparent the following year. Repairs were finally made in June '85. Mr. Kula felt the Corporation should not be charged for water not going into sewers but did not dispute the concept of sewer user charges. He requested rethinking by the Board because of the non- impact of water use on the sewer system. Mr. Marshall explained that the present system, based on consumption of water, had been adopted to compute sewer user charges, and since the water was consumed, he felt the charge legitimate. Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey and Mrs. Battin supported Mr. Marshall's view. Mr. McLaughlin, who had voted in the minority to approve an abatement previously, noted his recommendation at that time for an adjustment based on the highest use in three highest years. _ The consensus remained the same as at the time of the original vote to deny the request. CRC recs. Mrs. Battin reviewed the recommendations of the Center Revitalization Lex. Ctr. Committee on several Lexington Center Traffic items referred to the Committee traffic by the Selectmen. items She reported that the CRC supports the recommendation of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee regarding Hancock Church egress onto Mass. Avenue. The TSAC had advised no parking spaces be removed on Mass. Avenue, as requested by the Church•but that for one year the "Church reverse its circulation pattern, making the current exit the entrance and "vice versa". The Board voted to accept this recommendation on August 12, 1985. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommenda- tion of the Center Revitalization Committee and Traffic Safety Advisory Commit- tee that no crosswalk be installed on Mass. Avenue near Muzzey Street, because of existing nearby crosswalks at Leader Federal and Theatre Pharmacy. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommen- dations of the CRC and TSAC, that a crosswalk be installed across Muzzey Street at Mass. Avenue. With respect to installation of crosswalks at the entrance and exit of Depot Square, Mr. Mix, representing the TSAC, noted that because of handicapped ramps at sidewalks at those locations, crosswalks already exist there, although not painted on the pavement. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted that crosswalk markings be painted at the entrance and exit to Depot Square, as recommended by the • Center Revitalization Committee and the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee. The CRC and TSAC recommendations regarding installation of a crosswalk at Selectmen's MeetingOctober 21, 1985 6\25- Peking Garden on Muzzey Street were reviewed. Both Committees recommended """W that this action not be taken and were opposed to the removal of any parking spaces for this purpose. Mr. Tonaszuck, in his 9/23/85 memo, had pointed out the possibility of installing a crosswalk slightly further down Waltham Street, which would be located at a driveway on one side, requiring deletion of only one parking space. Since the CRC had specifically stated opposition to the removal of any spaces, it was voted to take no action on the suggestion at this time. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the recommenda- tion of the CRC for increased publicity of the existence of the Meriam Street lot for evening parkers by installation of blue 'P' signs of Mass. Avenue at Edison Way; at Depot Square and on Waltham Street, and that flyers, describing the Meriam Street lot, be placed in theatres and in all restaurants. The Board concurred with the CRC recommendation against extending the hours of on-street evening metering beyond 6 p.m. in order to encourage use of the Meriam Street lot. It was felt by the CRC that extended hours might hurt as many merchants as it would help. Mr. Marshall's view was that long-term parkers i.e. restaurant, theatre patrons' use of the Meriam Street lot would help the merchants by leaving on- street parking available for short-term parkers. He felt that that concept should be explored at a future time. The Board reviewed Mr. Eddison's October 16th memo with revisions to the Unaccepted proposed unaccepted street criteria entitled "Guidelines for Acceptance of Un-Street paved, Unaccepted Street". Mr. Eddison felt that the draft provided allowance Criteria for discretion of the Board in its decision processes. adopted With reference to consistency with Planning Board street guidelines, Mrs. Battin moved that the words "insofar as possible" under Procedures to be Followed, item E. , be changed to Insofar as necessary". The motion did not carry. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve "Guidelines for Acceptance of Unpaved, Unaccepted Streets" as follows: I. Significant improvement in public safety and public service access which shall include but not be limited to: A. Improved access for fire, ambulance and police vehicles. B. Improve access for school buses, refuse collection, DPW and service vehicles. C. Reduced cost arid difficulty of snow plowing and of annual maintenance. II. Cost effectiveness based upon benefit/cost analysis, which shall include but not be limited to: A. Quantifiable benefits: 1.) Number of households served directly or abutting the reconstructed street. 2.) Number of neighborhood households indirectly served by the recon- structed street (Because of the difficulty of defining a neighbor- hood, this benefit may not always be quantifiable.) 3.) Volume of traffic served. B. Quantifiable costs: 1.) Net total cost to Town; that is, total cost of design and construc- tion less betterment charge. pun 2.) Cost per linear foot of reconstructed street. Almm. Sql -6- III. Qualitative Factors: A. Qualitative Benefits: 1.) Elimination of mud, dust, puddles and potholes when an unpaved street_ is paved. 2.) Improved convenience for residents, school children, pedestrians, visitors and commercial vehicles. 3.) Enhanced appearance of the neighborhood and the Town. B. Non-Quantifiable Costs: 1.) Increased traffic/noise. 2.) Increased vehicular speed 3.) Loss of trees and shrubbery with accompanying loss of privacy, country-like appearance and related aesthetic values. Procedures to be followed: A. Petitions to be prepared and submitted to the Board of Selectmen by concerned citizens. B. Petitions shall be reviewed by Selectmen consistent with the above guidelines. C. The Town shall submit annually from its Master Plan a listing of streets to be accepted, with recommended priorities consistent with these guidelines. D. When a majority of residents from a street have submitted a petition for street construction, the petition shall remain active for three years. E. Insofar as possible, street construction guidelines shall be consis- tent with the Planning Board's Rules and Regulations Governing the Sub- division of Land in Lexington, MA. F. A final decision on which streets to recommend to Town Meeting for acceptance will be made by the Board of Selectmen based on the judge- ment of the Board. Maintenance of existing narrow, unaccepted streets: mod 1.) The Town will provide a limited service for maintenance requests, i.e. , limited to obtaining quotes for homeowners who have the res- ponsibility of maintaining their unaccepted street. 2. ) When streets pose a hazardous condition, the Town reserves the right to order appropriate maintenance of the street and bill the owner(s) . Anderson Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve sewer charges sewer in lieu of betterments in the amount of $2,260.94, for property owned by Albert Maple St. Anderson, 26 Maple Street, for sewer connection in Ingleside Road. Sher/Lex Inn Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the request of ext.hours Sheraton Lexington Motor Inn for extension of hours under its Innholder Liquor License to 1:00 a.m. on December 31, 1985. Sr.Center Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the request of Wine/Cheese the Human Services Committee for service of wine in the Senior Center on Novem- 11/7/85 ber 7, 1985, upon the occasion of a symposium to be held on that date. Water Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve abatement of kbatem. water receivables in the amount of $38.50 for M. Sandeen, 2 Liberty Avenue, Sandeen because of a billing error. 0 Selectmen's Meeting 0 -7- October 21, 1985 Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve abatement of Abatements Polk sewer user charges, in the total amounts of $428.98 and $36.69, for properties Sewer User not connected to Town sewer and therefore exempt from the charges. Charges The Board concurred with the Town Manager's recommendation that the Lincoln Street area be again opened on October 26 and 27, for dumping by residents of "Gloria" storm related brush. Lincoln St The Manager requested approval of the Board of the request of the New England Telephone and Boston Edison Company for permission to relocate poles Pole reloc. on Synnyknoll Avenue, Garfield Street and Emerald Street, received in his lations- office that day. Permission was needed to complete the construction of those Edison,N.E. three streets. No public hearing was necessary. Telephone It was also requested by the New England Telephone Company that permission & be given for installation of two new poles on Earl Street, again with no public new pole hearing required. install. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the petition of the New England Telephone Company and Boston Edison Company for relocation of poles on Sunnyknoll Avenue at Stations 1+80, 2+80 and 3+80 on the northerly side; on Garfield Street at Stations 5+5, 5+9- on the southerly side; on Emerald Street at Stations 2+60, 3+65 on the northerly side. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the petition of New England Telephone Company for installation of two poles on Earl Street, at locations shown on an accompanying map. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve Extra Work Extra Work NMI Order #1, under Contract 1/86-4-E, in the amount of $11,000, for filling of Order #1 low spots adjoining the improved Lincoln Street soccer field to insure proper Lincoln St. drainage and improve site aesthetics. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the appoint- Acting Towr ment of Susan Adler as Acting Town Manager from October 27 to October 31, Mgr.Adler 1985, during the absence of the Town Manager. The School Committee will be asked to meet with the Board of November 14th at 7:30 a.m. for discussion of budget targetting. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to authroize the Town D.C.Heath Manager to prepare an appropriate resolution for the Board's approval in 100th Annii acknowledgment of the 100th anniversary of the D. C. Heath Company. Mr. Hutchinson informed the Board that Michael Plummer will be interning M.Plummer in his office for the next six months. The Town will be receiving a grant T.Mgr.Inte- under the Minority Internship Project in the amount of $3,362. He also reported that he had been informed by Senator Kraus of a grant Land Inven award in the amount of $17,000 under the Incentive Aid program for a Town Grant land inventory project. He complimented Susan Adler who had filed this appli- cation for the development of the inventory giving special attention to poten- tial sites for housing. Mr. McLaughlin will not be in Town for attendance at the MCAB budget MCAB Meeti pima meeting on November 6. Mr. Marshall and Mr. Dailey will confer as to who will attend in Mr. McLaughlin's place. I -8- Exec.Session Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 - 0 by roll call vote, Chairman Marshall, Mrs. Battin, Mr. McLaughlin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey, to mmi go into Executive Session for discussion of land acquisition, with no intent to return to open session. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 11:30 p.m. A true record, Attest: / is Executive Clerk Clerk umi ..0 1 f { ° GS ELECTMEN S MEETING October 23, 1985 A Public Hearing on the petition of Greater Boston Community Develop- ment, Inc. for Special Permit and Site Plan Review under Section 9.5 of the Zoning By-Law of the Town of Lexington for the conversion of the Franklin School to 38 low and moderate income apartments was held on Wednesday, October 23, 1985, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Office Building, at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Marshall, Mrs. Battin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey; Mr. Hutch- inson, Town Manager; Mrs. Snow, Executive Clerk, were present. Also in attendance was David Rideout of Palmer & Dodge. The Chairman opened the hearing with the reading of a statement which Public SPS gave the purpose of the hearing, recapped Town Meeting approval procedures, Hearing and specified the procedures to be followed that evening. The audience was Franklin informed that comments would be heard and the matter taken under advisement., School with decision on the granting of the Special Permit and conditions to be Conversion made at a later meeting. Mr. Marshall referenced the report and recommendation of the Planning Board on the recommendation, dated October 22, 1985, and read the report, which unanimously recommended granting of the Special Permit. The report of the Board of Health, dated September 20, 1985, which listed concerns and health issues to be addressed such as sewage disposal, asbestos and lead paint, and any rodent problem which might appear following demoli- tion. The report of the Town Engineer, Francis X. Fields, dated October 3, 1985, commenting on drainage issues and connections to the sewerage system, was read. In a memo from Steven R. Frederickson, Building Commissioner, two con- cerns were listed: the height of the building relative to grading plans and compliance with Architectural Barriers Board regulations. A letter from the Conservation Commission, dated October 22, 1985, noting that no wetlands are involved in the project but recommending a condition in the Special Permit mandating implementation of appropriate erosion control measures, was read. Lisa Alberghini, Louise Elving and Steven Tice, Architect, representing Greater Boston Community Development, Inc (GBCD) were in attendance. Ms. Alber- ghini recapped progress with the project since Town Meeting approval in the Spring. She noted meetings held by GBCD with Town Boards, Department Heads and area residents to identify and address concerns and incorporate appropriate changes into the plans. She stated that GBCD's application for SHARP funding had been approved and that initial mortgage commitment had been made by MHFA. Construction start is scheduled for late December '85. • Ms. Alberghini requested appointment by the Board of a citizens tenant selection committee to work with GBCD in identifying criteria to be used in the selection process for the moderate income units. Mr. Tice reviewed the plans for the development. He noted that the origi- nal design proposed had been changed very little with the site plan and unit distribution remaining the same. In response to neighborhood input, a minor change had been made at the rear of the existing school building to avoid the more extensive demolition originally planned. b9' F -2- Parking for 64 cars, exceeding the requirements of the Zoning By-law by two, is proposed. Regarding the two existing carports, it was decided id because it was apparent that the one at the side must be taken down to com- '"" ply with side-line requirements under Zoning Regulations, it would be advisa- ble to remove both to avoid management problems with tenants who wish to have covered parking. Ms. Adler reported on issues of concern to abuttors relative to recrea- tional use of the school grounds. The Town will retain all but a minimal por- tion and playground equipment will be moved onto the Town owned area. Some replacement of equipment will be made. Parking and access provisions for the balifield were shown on an area map. Ms. Adler noted that 18 head-in spaces had been provided on Stedman Road and added that parking at the Clarke School lot, with access from Stedman Road, will be encouraged. A footpath leading to the lot will be improved and regu- lar users of the recreation area will be alerted to the alternative parking area. Ms. Alberghini reviewed GBCD's response to Board of Health recommendations. The development will be connected to the sanitary sewer system in Stedman Road. Also as required, all asbestos and lead paint will be removed from the building. In response to Mr. Eddison's questions relative to the car-ports, Mr. Tice explained the reasoning behind the decision to eliminate both structures which would have provided covered parking for 20% of the residents. The Zoning By-law requirements regarding side-line setback could not be met in the case of the side car-port without asking the Town for additional land. It was felt that difficulties would arise as to which tenants would be given the relatively few spaces in the remaining car port, which led to the decision to _ that structure also. ■ od Mr. Eddison raised the point that the rear car-port might be needed for parking of elderly or handicapped tenants. Ms. Albergini said the the two apartments for handicapped have nearby parking spaces and ramps. She added that it is anticipated that the edlerly will be housed in the one- and two-bedroom units at the front of the building, and not near the car-port. Regarding the first (side) car-port, Mr. Dailey suggested application for Board of Appeals variance. With respect to elimination of the rear car-port, he asked if the open parking could be rearranged to give more room for the ball- field. Ms. Alberghini responded that the parking area is relatively tight as it is and that rearrangement would be difficult because of existing slopes and placement of driveways. Mr. Marshall suggested realignment of the ball-field to ease parking spaces. Mr. Dailey asked if there would be a problem having the same group involved with selection processes for both low- and moderate-income units. Ms. Alberghini responded that the commitments to Town Meeting were that the Housing Authority would have jurisdiction over the low-income units and that a representation of townspeople would deal with the moderate income units. Mr. Dailey asked if LexHAB could be designated to handle both processes. Ms. Alberghini said that per MHFA requirements and commitment to Town Meeting, the Housing Authority must handle the low-income process. Mr. Marshall asked for comments from the audience. In response to Mrs. Gaudet's request, Mr. Tice described landscaping and lighting plans to date. The landscaping plan, as submitted to the Planning Board but not to the neighbors, indicating various types and species of trees, was shown and visual buffer, fencing and plantings, were pointed out. •■d Selectmen's Meeting October 23, 1985 ) 14 -3- Mrs. Gaudet expressed concern that the general site lighting, on a 00"ft timing device, would impact abuttors. Mr. Tice said he felt concerns with lighting had been mutual and had been addressed as follows: 10 ft. to 12 ft. poles, with the light shining down, and of a design compatible with the development and in keeping with the neighborhood. There will be quite a number of samll lights, also illumination for a small sign indicating the 2-way driveway. Design selection is now in process. Ms. Alberghini added that the landscaping submitted to the Planning Board but not the neighbors, is in comformance with requirements of the Zoning By-Law. She pointed out the U-shaped driveway at the front of the school will be eliminated and grassed, which, it is hoped, will decrease current traffic problems. In response to Mrs. Gaudet's request for a more detailed planting scheme for review by abuttors, Ms. Alberghini said that at the time of application for Building Permit, inter-Town agency comments will be sought on the more detailed plan submitted, and noted that there will be quite a rigorous review in that process. Mrs. Whyte, 11 Allen Street, noted that the side car-port to be removed, was to have provided screening. She asked for screening with trees, rather than fencing, which may deteriorate in time. Mr. Tice felt that fencing was a closer approximation of the car-port, but was agreeable to plantings if preferred. In answer to Mrs. Gaudet's request for details of the facade of the town houses, Ms. Alberghini gave the following description: front and ends will be 004 brick; the rear of the buildings, facing the inside of the site, will be wood. 1 Mr. Tice gave additional information on the spacing, locations and types of lights to be installed. Mr. Ciriello, 4 Stedman Road, asked a redesign of the driveway entrance to aid in the resolution of the long-standing problem of cars backing into resi- dents driveways, while reversing direction. He also noted that if the drive remains as is, he will be subject to headlights of drivers exiting from the development. Of the on-street parking spaces, 5 will be eliminated and 18 retained with the spaces clearly delineated. Discussion continued on the 18 parking spaces on Stedman Road, referenced previously, which will be retained for users of the ball-field. The option of parking at the upper Clarke lot, which will be encouraged, was noted. The Manager added that it would be unrealistic to remove the 18 spaces, as requested by residents, but that effort will be made to direct parkers to the Clarke lot. The possibility of opening Stedman Road for access to the lower Clarke parking lot was suggested by a resident of Allen Street. Regarding access to the conservation area, Ms. Alberghini said there would be a pathway from the rear parking area, clearly defined by railroad ties. There was discussion of methods of trash disposal. Ms. Alberghini said that curb -side pick-up had been considered, but installation of dumpsters was thought to be preferable. Mr. Tonaszuck concurred with the latter method, noting maintenance problems with trash cans. He suggested that on-site dump- sters, fenced and landscaped would be the best solution. Locations for dump- sters are being actively investigated by the developer. Regarding Mr. Ciriello 's suggestion that the 18 parking spaces be removed risft and an access road to the recreation area be constructed, it was stated that the park-and-walk plan, from that area and the Clarke lot was thought to be the most appropriate and would be retained. . ,6 -4- To offset problems to neighbors from recreation parkers, it was agreed that when the field is reserved for adult/group activities, restrictions can be stated on the permit and can be enforced, as has been done at other fields. In response to comments on parking problems resultant from use of the Clarke School by the Chinese School on Sunday afternoons, the School Committee will be asked to inform the school officials of appropriate parking locations. It was noted that the School is actively looking for its own location and this may not be an issue by 1987 occupancy. The posting of Stedman Road for one side only parking will not be changed. Mrs. Whyte asked for a commitment from the Board that if severe parking problems evolve as a result of the residential use of Franklin, a solution will be provided. Mr. Marshall responded that once the development is stabilized, every effort will be made to work with tenants of Franklin, neighbors and users of the recreation area, if problems develop. Mrs. Whyte felt that a solution will be impossible without more off-street parking and an access road to the recreation area. Mr. Marshall repeated coopera- tion with residents and an exploration of the situation if that need arises, but noted that Town Meeting would have to approve funding for construction of an access road. Mr. Dailey suggested that a condition be included in the Special Permit relative to the landscaping of the grounds. Special Permits previously granted to other converted schools were referenced as to texts of such conditions. Mr. McLaughlin suggested that detailed drawings of the plantings, in color, and illustrations of the side parking area and fencing vs. evergreens would be helpful in review of the plans with abuttors. In response to Mr. Ciriello's statement that the developer should take re- sponsibility for adverse impacts off-site, i.e. should construct the access road, Mr. Marshall noted that the objective was to provide affordable rental units and that the rents would have to be raised' to off-set that expense. Mr. Hutchinson rm. said he didn't see the access road as good use of the land and felt it unfair to ask the developers to do more than the Town or previous tenants had been asked. He repeated that the Town will work with the neighbors if an adverse traffic im- pact becomes an actuality. Speaking as a Town Meeting member, Mrs. Gaudet noted the plans for two committees, the Housing Authority to deal with the low-income units and a citi- zen's committee to develop criteria for the moderate-income units. She questioned the need for this additional citizens' committee with two housing related commit- tees now in existence. Mr. Marshall replied that L exHAB involvement in L .H.A. Franklin proceedings and representation on the citizen committee was planned. Mr. Marshall summarized the list of items to be referenced as conditions in the Special Permit as follows: Provision by GBCD of a detailed and definitive landscaping plan for review Lighting plan Trash disposal provision Fencing vs/ planting as a buffer at the side-line of the property Brick facaded - end and front walls of the town houses Regarding the heating system planned, Mr. Tice described the system which would not require exterior heat pumps, were installed at Muzzey, and have been the cause of complaints by residents. Mr. Hutchinson suggested that a draft Special Permit could be ready by review and consideration by the Board on November 4th. There being no further questions or comments from the Board or the audience, we, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 9:35 p.m. 4° -5- , Following the close of the hearing, the Board briefly discussed the * application to the Board of Appeals of Michael Colangelo, Maguire Rd. Realty Trust, for Special Permit with Site Review for construction of a 24,000 sq. ft. Office Building on 2.24 acres on Hartwell Avenue. Mr. Eddison noted that the issue of increased traffic on Bedford Street which would be generated by the proposed facility is a matter of concern to the Planning Board and is the major basis of its recommendation to deny the appli- cation. ppli- cation. Al so , the applicant is claiming hardship in his petition to construct on land below the minimum lot area requirement. Mr. Eddison noted that the land had been purchased in 1985 and Mr. Colangelo had been advised of this restrict- ion at the time. On this basis the Planning Board determined that no hardship can be demonstrated. He asked for the Board's expression of opposition to the granting of the Permit. Mr. Eddison referred to Lexington's promise to Governor Dukakis to do all that is possible to restrict new develops ent which would have an adverse effect on the road system and noted possible jeopardizing of the Bedford Street Improve- ment Plans which will require State approval, if the Colangelo development is allowed. It was agreed that Mr. Eddiso wo a tInd the October 24th Board of Appeals hearing and express t o vie s o t riemb t s of the Board of Selectmen in unanimous support of the Plan g Board's position in opposition to the proposal. Upon mo tion duly made and seconded, it was vo ted to adjourn at 9:47 p.m. ,! i, t , 71 AciA)74 A true record, Attest: �,. S n• Executive Clerk Pm ... VOID r 11\ SELECTMEN'S MEETINGPow o1 ' October 28, 1985 A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was convened on Monday, October 28, 1985, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Office Building at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Marshall, Mrs. Battin, Mr. McLaughlin, Mr, Eddison, Mr. Dailey; Ms. Adler, Acting Town Manager; Mr. Cohen, Town Counsel, were Present. Mrs. Snow,. Executive Clerk, joined the meeting shortly after its opening. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted 5 - 0 by roll call vote: Mr. Marshall, Mrs. Battin, Mr. McLaughlin, Mr. Eddison, Mr. Dailey, to go into Executive Session for discussion with Chairmen of the Finance Committees present of matters of land acquisition, with the intent to return to open session. Open session was resumed at 7:36 p.m. and the meeting adjourned to Cary Memorial Hall for the holding of a scheduled Public Information Meeting on the concept of the Minuteman Commuter Bikeway. Mr. Marshall opened the meeting with an explanation of its purpose and thanked those in the audience for attending. He noted that when consideration of the Bikepath had come before a previous Board, there had been a four to one vote in support of the concept. He explained that the matter is again before the Board because Sec. Salvucci of the Office of Construction and Transportation, had informed the Town that he pan is prepared to move from concept to design and construction and has directed the MBTA to proceed with abandonment of the right-of-way in which the bikepath would be constructed. Mr. Marshall stated the procedural rules for the evening's presentation and discussion, particularly with reference to ground rules for those in the audience who wished to speak in favor, in opposition or as uncommitted. Ms. Adler was introduced and reviewed the basic elements of the proposed bikeway as now understood, which were available to the audience in written form at the rear of the hall. This summary included information on the concept, fund- ing, cost to the Town, design issues, most recent development, previous action, user projections, public safety, and the status of other communities involved (Cambridge, Arlington and Bedford) . Position statement of the Conservation Commission and Recreations Commit- tee were requested. The Chairman announced that the Planning Board's report had been received and that its recommendation would be read. Joyce Miller, Chairman of the Conservation Commission, stated the Com- mission's unanimous_ support of the bikeway concept as a means to provide rec- reation, transportation and as an excellent use of the land. The report of the Planning Board., in strong support of construction of the bikepath, was read by Mr. Marshall. The report of the Recreation Committee was given later in the evening by its Chairman, Robert Eby, who voiced his Committee's unanimous support of the bikeway for recreation and commuting. He urged that safety measures be taken Y -2- for crossings, with automobile rights-of-way at some and cyclist rights-of- ways at others. Chairman Daniel McCabe of the Capital Expenditures Committee presented mmid that committee's comments on the bikeway concept. As a primary concern, the committee saw the need for capital planning regarding future requests for lighting, plowing and policing. He requested a meeting with the Selectmen to review these financial issues. The Chairman asked for comments from those in the audience. Of the more than 225 present, 76 indicated their interest in speaking. Of those, 39 registered to speak in favor; 31 in opposition and 6 registered as uncommitted at that time. The Chairman asked that repetitious comments be avoided. Comments and suggestions were made as follows by those in favor of the concept: . Best use of the land. Would take bicycles off the streets. • CLC had expressed strong interest and support. Reference was made to fears of abuttors of other projects before implementation, which had proved not to be valid. . Saw increased future commuting use of the path. As a commuting/recrea- tional cyclist felt the 12' width was needed for safety of walkers. . Would provide a feasible route for commuting and other uses i.e. jogging, shoppping and would require a 12' width. Cyclists who fear to travel on streets would use the path. Applauded as a bikepath which "goes somewhere". . Referenced Presque Isle bikeway and its pleasures and varied uses i.e. family commuting plus recreational use of bikes. . Noted safety to self as a cyclist and others on this direct route from mod home to Lexington Center, without the dangers of Mass. Avenue. . Stressed benefits of cycling for exercise. Favored 12' width for safety in passing other-bikes; warned of the dangers of '5' curves. . Felt no problem with sharing with joggers; felt 12' a bit excessive, but 6' too narrow. . Noted designation by MAPC as a transportation corridor and linear park, felt it would be an appropriate use of the land and would result in fewer cars on the roads. Noted efforts of the Conservation Commission to con- trol flooding along the right-of-way (sewer route) . . Commuter felt it would be a great pity not to have this opportunity for use as in Holland. Re the 12' width, suggested a center barrier to separate lanes. . Would provide a faster, safer commuting route. The 12' width would give needed maneuvering room. . As a runner, could use the bikepath except in peak a.m./p.m. peak hours. Has seen no problems, except for evidence of midnight dumping. Noted efforts of the Conservation Commission to preserve existing trees. Urged all to walk at least a section of the path. • Abuttor and daily user of the Vinebrook bikepath, had heard no complaints from other Morrow Crossing residents (abuttors) regarding that paved bike- - way, and no evidence of letter. Felt that the path was self-policing. Noted Boston Globe survey in which cycling was placed as 3rd of the most popular recreational activities. Would also provide access to other recreational facilities, such as tennis. -3- 40 • Selectmen's Meeting October 28, 1985 . Abuttor, motorist and cyclist-- uses Vinebrook bike path on the basis of safety, health factors. Noted access to other communities. Motor bike use was not seen to be a major problem on that path. . As a 12-year commuting cyclist, felt the width to be a bit excessive, but foresaw a people-watch by users and abuttors which would discourage vandals. • Urged support as an alternative transportation opportunity . Cyclist, 3-time accident victim, felt safety was a real issue. Noted hazards of biking as road become more congested. Noted the asset to Denver, Colorado of its bikeway. . Noting that an 8' width is a federal requirement, supported the 12' width of the path to accommodate overgrowth at its sides. Felt current problems with motorized cycles, drinking parties and which require police presence would be decreased by monitoring of regular bike traffic. Noted low cost per trip for cycling commuters. . In favor on grounds of safety, health and convenience. . As a biker for a portion of his trip to work, would prefer availability of a longer safe bikeway. . In favor of construction. If left as a weed and dirt path, will be used by dirt bikers. Had seen no motorized bikes on the Cape Cod bikeway. . As Transportation Advisory Committee member, in favor as access to other towns; anticipated high use. . As a member of the Boston Area Bicycle Coalition, supported the bikeway as a regional access to the MBTA. Noted the benefits of recreational uses such as cross country skiiing. Felt concerns expressed could be addressed in the design stage and saw no adverse fiscal impact on the Town. . Bedford resident noted difficulties which would be resolved in the Bedford/ Lexington commute. Urged support and felt that "as Lexington goes, so goes Bedford". . Recreational teen aged biker noted need for width to pass runners (who are unaware of cyclists because of wearing headphones) . Would provide away to get to Cambridge for those who do not drive and to avoid exhaust fumes. . In favor, but considers bikeway to be 5 miles of road with the same security, littering and speeding problems as roads. Felt it should be restricted to specific types of vehicles and suggested a toll to cover expenses if neces- sary. . Saw future use by her family for connection with population centers but felt that attention should be given to periodic brush removal (fire hazard) and barriers at grade crossings. Suggested that bikers be required to walk their bikes across intersecting streets. . Saw the implementation of the bikepath as a means to encourage "closet bikers". Those speaking in opposition made comments as follows: • Abuttor demonstrated a 12' width, wide enough for two cars, which she felt designated the bikepath as a road. She felt a 6' path would be sufficient. She noted biker speeds of 25 mph, which she felt would impose danger to pima children and elderly walkers. Questioned use of Town funds for this purpose. -4- . Abuttor saw no need for paving. In a natural state, the path could be used for walkers, birdwatching, etc. ▪ Abuttor - said there were no answers after 4 years of effort on issues such as security, trespassing and costs. He noted that the right-of- way will be retained for possible future use for Red Line extension, which would a large amount of money wasted if the bikepath is torn up. . 'Abuttor - Expressed concern about loss of trees and other environmental damage resulting from construction. . As an abuttor tohthe Great Meadow, he sees problems with drinkers, motor- ized cycles there and difficulties with Police enforcement. Felt issues regarding costs for policing of the path had not been properly, addressed. . Abuttor - Saw more need than now anticipated for policing regarding drink- ,ers, speeding cyclists and felt bike would increase present problems. • Abuttor - Felt that there would increased illegal uses with a paved bikepath; noted abuttors' rights to privacy. • Abuttor - Questioned how evening commuters can use an unlighted bikepath and felt sure that there would be a future request for lighting at great expense to the Town. . Abuttor - Since the funding has not been voted by the State, suggested that there was still time to address unanswered issues i.e. drainage and security. . Reference was made to the Denver bikeway. Rather than the $3 to $5,0001 year for maintenance originally forecast, the city has been forced to hire three full-time workers for this purpose. It has been found that bikers are not cooperative about keeping the path clean. Questioned the source, if more than $4000/year is needed here for maintenance. . Abuttor - in favor of use of the path for walking, but during the past summer noted the presence of many parties and Mopeds. The Police can *■■' not reach the area quickly enough to intervene. She worries about secur- ity and questioned usage of the path in winter if not plowed. . Abuttor - questioned whether the usage would be high enough to justify costs. He felt that data on surveys taken were inaccurate and inflated. He urged leaving the land in a natural state. . Abuttor - Not opposed to biking but opposed to a vote being taken when the bikepath is still in the concept stage and there is no definitive proposal. . Opposed on basis of width (same as one lane of Rte. 128) ; security, if the area is not to be policed; long term economics. Even though funded by the State, it will still be payed for by tax-payers. Noted hazards to children on an isolated roadway. . Abuttor - Could foresee cyclists from other connecting towns attracted to the bikeway because of its 12' width . Felt that money should be spent on other uses of more Town-wide benefit. • Opposed - Felt forecast of 6,000 daily users was not a realistic figure,and that the construction would be a misuse of funds. Those iuncommi,ted.Fon"the proposal made the following comments: . Has not taken a position ,because of questions ion certain' issues not answer- able at this time. . Although a cyclist, questioned a large capital commitment for use of bikers only. -5- isimm .Has an open mind, but feels concern for abuttors regarding the width proposed and dangers to cyclists encountering speeding cars at inter- secting streets. .Would enjoy use of the bikeway but felt that the 12' width will result in problems i.e. illegal motorist use. .Has ongoing concerns about vandalism, access to and from his property, use by motorized bikes. As an abuttor, asked for consideration of a bikepath aligned with an existing roadway. .Favors the concept but has reservations about the 12' width. Mr. Marshall summarized concerns stated as follows: the width proposed; vehicle access; trespassing and security; drainage; cost of maintenance; retention of the right-of-way as a transportation corridor. There being no further comments, the Chairman declared the Information Session closed and announced the Board's intention to vote on the concept on November 4th. Ms. Adler noted the vote on October 21, 1985, to approve installation of N.E.Tel & two poles on Earl Street, as requested by the New England Telephone Company. Boston She pointed out that the poles are jointly owned by Boston Edison and New Edison England Telephone companies, and that the October 21st vote should be amended Earle St. to reference this fact. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the petition of Boston Edison Company and New England Telephone Company for installation of two jointly owned poles on Earl Street, at locations as shown on an accompany- ing map. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to grant permission as Ch./Redeem- requested by the Church of Our Redeemer for parishioners to carry sandwich er-Sandwicl board signs in Lexington Center on November 2, 1985, to advertise the board sign Church's Annual Fall Fair. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the request of Peace the Lexington Committee for a Nuclear Weapons Freeze for permission to use the Vigil - Battle Green on November 19, 1985, in conjunction with a candlelight walk and Battle Gr, vigil. Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. i A true record, Attest: Le.'/AUL6-)1 Marion H. Snow Executive Clerk ad