Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-09-15-HFA-min ........_ ... A G E N D A i?anscom Field .Advisory- Cos!mmission Tuesday, September 15, 1987 7:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. Minutes 7:40 P.M, Airport Action Agenda - D. Ta, Davis 8:.10 P,M. Cerasuolo Land Purchase Report - J. Hals 8:30 P.M, Statistics and Planning Report - J. Hals 8:45 P,M. Noise Subcommit tee Report R. Theriault 9:15 P,P~. Operations Subc ommittee Report - B. Sohni 9:30 P.M. GEIR - Synopsis of Final - N. Faramelli 9:45 P.M, Other The meeting will be held in the Selectmen°s Meeting Room, Town Office Building, 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, Lexington, Massachusetts. HAI'dSCQM FIELD ADVISORY CQMMISSION MINUTES OF THE MEETING JUNE ibq 1987 The attendees were: Joyce Hals F'aui Roberts Robert Domnitz Graydon Wheaton Francesca deVan Jack Arrrro~Er Frank: Hidinger- Rich Theriauit Ed Farnsworth B r-ad Coen i har, Jofiita Jordan Henry Wifholm Jar~,e Farmer- Fred t9arci:s Bill Sahni Ben Obear R. D. Sanford Michelle Matteo J.t~i. Wr-aga Bob Lombardo Donald H. Wilson Dee Shepard Ted J~tla Eugene Walend~iewic~ John H. Ryva~ian LTC. Tim Courington CQL. William Flanagan Ales; L. Seid Richard Dube F`eter V. ~-::aselis Wesley E. Stimpson Mel E{erman Fred Lebow Ed Trautman Phil Cooper Matt Weisman Michael Steer Feter Franks Michael Dye Theresa S~yreansk:i Norman Faramelli Peter Barker Gary Skocay David Needham Massport Concord Merriam Hill Assoc. CAF•A Massport Massport Massport Lincoln Carlisle Acton Carli=le Digital LWV Lincoln NBAA A.Q.F'.A. Gillette Bedford Beet he raf t Beechcraft H.F'.A. Massport H.F'.A. H.F`.A. Le~;ington Hanscom AFB Lase Commander, HAF€~ Massport Hanscom AFB Hanscom AFB Haley R•. Aidr-ich. Inc. H.F.A. H.F'.A. Lexington Cobey Hangar Gorp. Cobey Hangar Corp. Greiner Engineering Lexington Jet Aviation Jet Aviation Massport Lexington Lexington Lexington 1. Min~_r.te=_. - There were na corrections t4s the mint_ttes. ~. Statistics and F'lanninq Joyce Hals distributed the EXF' and noise complaint reports and discussed t!-,e following: There were 24,b~>4 operations in May of 1687, compared to ii_~,E,95 ir, May, 15'86. Massport assumes this was due to improved weather conditions. The number of jet operations in May was appro~:irr,ately the same as in April. The May EXF' increased over April and can be attributed to increased night operations. On Friday after-noon, June 5tl-,, an Air Force fly-by, passed twice over a flag pole during a retreat cer-err,ony. The fly-by was conducted by a noisy B~5 and a T-6, .and generated a number of noise co,r,piaints from Le,:inq_ton residents. AFB Colonel Flanagan assured the Commission that this was unusual and in the futur-es fly-bys will be conducted in quieter A-1~}'s or F-16 a. i.r-cr-aft. Hals also repor-ted that the Statistics ~r F'lanrring report cannat t-,e r-tL.dy a weeE:: before tl-,e HFAC meeting to be sent with the Agenda because the data used far- the report cannat be released soon enough by tt-re FAA to allow the report to be completed in time. Richard Theriault Hated that the May statistics report shows monthly, •t•ea.r-lv and nightl~}• increases in operations. He added that noise was r,~_~r°e nati.ceable. Hals told members tt',at in May during the hour=_. of lj F'-~+. and 7 A.M. there were nine jet arrivals and eight jet departures, plus CT singles and i._y twin turbos. Seven operations were a}tempt from, the surc#-,arge dtte to weather and mechanical problems. Richard Theriault thought the cost of the surcharge should be increased. Michelle Matteo ash::ed if they are the same people all the time. Bob I?omrrit~ said that because there were ~4,~t=~4 operations in May it is possible that Hanscom is at the field capacity. Hals noted the GEIR states that .'~i~,Crifi} operations per year is capacity, I}omnitz replied that ~=,i~cit; operations a month translates into 3t'ri.~~t~C~i_f per year, and the GEIR should reflect this fact. Rich Theriault asked if the ~•~ia,i_rcri~ is accurate and if the number reflects daily or annual ma>:imum capacity. He also asked if the capacity was for normal operating hours of 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. Fred Marcus was concerned that maximum capacity is being misrepresented and asked to have. it defined. FranE:: Hidinger, Airport Manager, said that the capacity issue controls itself because flight instructors cannot do touch and qo's wk-,en it is busy.. Following this discussion Joyce Hals said she will review where the .T~f=a,c_)r.")C_'1 number came from and discuss it with the Operations Sub committee. Hals also advised the members that the Aviation staff will be e::piaining to the Massport Board members the opinions and concerns regarding purchase of the Cerasuolo property in Bedford. She e;pia.ined that Massport is concerned abot_it future actions from Bedford regarding reaning and this may be an issue with Board members. Mtn=.=.~or-t wi 1 1 F-:eep the Commission informed on the proceedings. Joyce Hals concluded her report by saying tt-,at Massport will be meeting with Lincoln Selectmen on June ~~ to review the 1986 Noise Report. _ Air Force. Base Hazardous Waste Remedial F'rograrn Wesley Stimson, representing The AFB consulting firm of Haley and Aldri,d~le, reported on the Air Force plan for removing haardou=_ waste nri h1 a.=sport property which was dumped by the Rir Force during 19bE~-iP;'4. The Air Force"s aggressive program will clean up several sites and is e>;pected to last ~4~> year=_. and poses no health hazards.. The Air- Force program is us~.aally divided in four phases, which are first of all on assessment further refinement and remedial action-,. In this case phases ? and :_~ have been s~::ipped in order to push forward with the program. Five Sites will. be wor~::ed on out of an original i' identified as possible problems. A Hartwell Road fire training area, and a paint disposal, site near South RoadR a burial pit, fire training a.nd sanitary landfill area are the sites identified in Concord acrd Lincoln. None of the sites are near runways. The remedial action for site one includes e~;cavation and removal of waste plus iriground water collection treatment wells which strip contaminents. Sites two and t~„~~e will use the same technology. Site four will be capped with impervious mats-riai and tt~e landfill closed by DEC~E standards. The Selectmen from impacted towns have been briefed and a public meeting will be held on June ."C~, 15?8?. _. Thunderbird Show Review LTC. Cour-ington of the Air- Force Base reviewed procedures far the air- show to be held on August ^`~tl-,. The Air Force Base expects Tr,_)i_3~arr_ii3 visitor-=_.. A Friday mor-Wing practice will tai::e place and they will not ad~•rer-tile it to prevent spectators.. 4. F=~c~_i_~r~~I _Air~~ort_Ct~~dti~ 1'Jorman Faramelli reviewed the findings of tF-,e New England airports ability to provide alternative service opportunities and relieve the growth pressure on Logan Airport. He outlined the methodology znsed. The study began with a survey of Logan passengers to establish what would be needed to diver-t them to other airports. The availability of back:-up flights 4ya5 found to be a major finding, hence, the focus of the study became larger airpor-ts. The consultants e..plored =_.evesal alternatives Such as: a. alternate commuter hugs at Manchester, Providence, and Worcester, but was dropped because the concept did not generate enough traffic. b. a New York: bypass, which was also dropped because the New Yor-~; air-por-ts do not have enough capacity to absorb the additional traffic. c a "ring concept", i.e., increased air carrier service #rom Worcester, Providence and Manchester. Coupled with the "ring", the passibility of greater utiTi~ation of Bradley as a New England commuter hub. The consultants found that both the "ring" and Bradley hub, if implemented, could slow down Logan's growth rate. (Over the long-terra, each of these has the potential of accommodating roughly, -4'l, of Logan's traffic.) The consultants believe that increased activity at the three airports may also entice new commuters. If the three airports increase their activity plus Bradley becomes a commuter- hub,. the possibility is that it can taFce the pressure off of Logan. If not, it means looking for a second airport. The difficulty is finding enough land. Hanscom would not be a likely candidate due to di~ticul.ty of filight patterns, nearby residential areas, problerr~ of access and the National F'arE::. Hanscom could not provide enough relief. There is no roam for growth at Hanscom. There is no point in transferring the traffic. IVo decisions have been reached at this point in tl-~,e study. 5. Proposed Gillette Hangar Lease fi~ssignment Sandy Sanford, Ct-,ief F'ilot for Gillette, advised member-s that Gillette is in the process of disposing df its assets at Hanscom Field. Tt-,e hangar has 7 11~ years remaining of the es;isting lease. Gillette would like to assign the lease to Cabey Corporation. Matthew Weisman was introduced as president of the corporation. Mr. Weisman e:;plained that he has been in corporate aviation fior twenty years at Islip and Teter-born Airports. He is interested in worE,ing with community groups and has been on various advisory councils and committees. He has been teaching a few years and would like to re enter aviation. He introduced his partner F'hil Cooper. Weisman e.:plained that the corporation will have joint owners who will base their private aircraft in the hangar. There will be no selling ofi services to outside customers. Michael Dye of Jet Aviation said he would tae opposed to any fuel sales taking place. Michelle Matted, Chairman of the Commission, as~::ed Weisman to t::eep HFAC informed regarding the types of aircraft which will be based in the hangar. ~. Final Dr-aft of the Greiner C_ iv~il Terminal Site__Development F;l_a_n and. Desi~n__Cuidelines Flans ~ ~~ __._ Steven Carr and Mike Steer, consultants from, Carr L.yr,ch Associates and ~3reiner Engineering presented the plans. They reviewed the process used to deterrr,ine the planned layo~!t of the Terrr,inai area for the periods of is td 5 years and from ~ to iia years. They also discussed the need for de=_.ign g~tidel ine=_.. The consultants wor~::ed wi tf ~ tfa.s=.pnr-t and also took: into accor~nt comrrrents ,r,ade Fy the HFAC operations sub committee. Steve Carr said the guidelines include putting utilities underground, new signage, organised parking lots, landscaping and a cohesive line of buildings and colors. Mi~;e Steer discussed the phasing and changes possible at the three sides of the airside of the Terminal and what ct-,anges would be required far various types of growth. Corporate hangars would remain on the east side in the vicinity of F'neumo and Gillette. Ther-e is goad opportunity for a flight school hangar facility as well as es:pansion opportunities for E~eechcraft. The new E~eechcrafit facility would require a change in use ofi the e.;isting ramp areas, Tiedown customers now parked in the vicinity of the new Beechcraft transient ramp would be relocated to the Tower area currently serving transient aircraft. A new 75 car parking area will be built to accommodate the change. Flight school tiedowns will be relocated further down the ramp near the proposed new hangar. Steer showed that to the northeast there is room far additional tiedown areas to be built to serve the flight schools. The west side offers the best opportunity for changes. The East Coast Aerotech School (SCAT ) may be moved at the end of their five year lease. The Hangar ~ area located adjacent to ECAT~ combined with the SCAT area, would be free for same new aviation activity. The school can be moved near-by and can retain any requir-ed need for ramp. Jet Aviation has an opportunity to expand their hangar area. Two new ramps could be built to accommodate any need for- additional tiedowns and transient parking. Ta:;iways and access to the east side would have to be reconfigured if new ramp areas are built. ~~. t"1pEr;~t_ians Lib corr+rr,i ttee_ F'epart Sill Sahni said that he had reviewed tt-,e plan and felt that the plan t;arf tt-,re~ bottom lines. 1. The net change in noise will be minimal. ~. There would be a basic incr-ease in tiedowns of 5{~ spaces. _. The worst case would be that 8C>-IUC~ tiedowns would be relocated witt-+ir~, i--=~ years depending on transient management area uses and whether- corn++r+uter- services would be developed . 1 f demand were really great, same additional tiedowns could be added to an area near tt-re Digital hangar. Sa{-+ni aisa said that issues such as telephones, shelter, buslnq, and flight planning, are important. Fred i`1ar-cus stated that t!-~,_~ plan waL!ld change the natLlre of tt-,e airport and believe=. that the planned changes will attract people and help gr-ow t.l-,. He fieels the plan cannot help bL!t change the character of the airport and that groa~ti-, of airports creates demand. He asked haw mLlch additi.anal growth the airport can tolerate"' Massport's response wa.=_. ti-,a.t the plan does not constitute a policy change. The pilots =.tated that. th_~y use a.ir-cr-afit mare ofit:en than on weet::ends. They ai=_-o e;plained that they believe the planned relocation to the East ramp will Iea..ve their, seer-ile of ser-vices. There was aisa discussion r-eg:~.rding the areas available for- based aircraft and transient a. i r ~~ r-af t . "f he c_'ansensL!=_. of the representatives ofi the Hanscor, F`i l ots Association was that the owners of light, aircraft should be considered and that Masspar-t. was taa concerned over- transient aircraft. Massport staff responded that all users have been consider-ed and tt-,a.t each ne.-. ctc~p will be taken carefully. The staff and cons!_litants e>.plained that the}~ have listened to the variaL!s concerns stated and have taEen them into consideration during the stLld;j. TI-,ey plan to recorn,r,end the plan to the Soard ofi Directors. rJoise Sub_Corr~+T,lttee_.Fiepart Richard Theriault reported that the Sub Committee had discL!ssed the Hanscom Filots Association analysis of the noise evaluation report. He aisa reported that the committee had reviewed the sLlmmer intern program to gatt-+er information for new Ldn contours . The Noise Sr.tb Cornm~ttee plans summer meetings to review progress of the study and the c~,nputer model used by Harris Miller Miller and Hansen to calcL!late EXF'. Theriauit said the model is still an item open for mare discussion. The results of the Ldn study will be available in the late fall. The ne::t meeting of the Noise Sub Committee will be held on ~~uly 15th. Other F.-,_:._~ ;°f-„-c L: _. ~:d~,~i~.ed members that he has no objections to Massport is_,L!ing pr'-ess releases. ,~_ __ __ m„ ~.~ fill MASSPOi~T, TEN PA'?K PLAZA, BOSTON, MA 02116-3971, (617) 973-5500 TELEX 94-0365 September 9, 197 Bear Members of the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission, Boards of Selectmen, Lexington, Lincoln, Bedford and Lexington and Neighbors of Hanscom Fielda We've enclosed the press release which was issued at the time of the announcement along with accompanying charts on the major paints of the plan® Massport's four point plan is deigned to improve air safety, service and scheduling at Logan Airport by raising the fees for smaller aircraft, improving Federal funding and coordination for the regional airport network, developing an air passenger "bill of rights", and implementing a stronger Federal agenda® The Federal funding and coordination component of our program is designed to provide additional funding for development of facilities and services at such regional commercial airports as Bradley, CT, Worcester, MA, Manchester, NHS Portland, ME, and Green Airport in Providence® In our view these airports have the potential to OPERATING: BOSTON LOGAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT • PORT OF BOSTON GENERAL CARGO AND PASSENGER TERMINALS • TOBIN MEMORIAL BRIDGE HANSCOM FIELD • BOSTON FISH PIER • COMMONUVEALTH PIER To® Hanscom Field Advisory Commission Neighbors of Hanscom-Field accommodate a greater share of New England's growing demand for new aviation services. Hanscom Field would not be a recipient of these targeted funds, nor does Massport plan to take any action which would change Hanscom's character as a general and corporate aviation facility. We wi11 be meeting with Department of Transportation (DOT) officials this week to inform them of our plans, and to press for action on the Federal components of our action plan. We will be able to discuss this meeting in more detail on Tuesday night. All of us at Massport are very pleased that Boston's Mayor Flynn has embraced our four point plan, and has abandoned his initial suggestion that Hanscom be studied as a potential. "reliever" airport for Logan. Massport does not see Hanscom in this role, nor do we think that the "second airport" strategy provides a good short-term solution to congestion at Logan® Our new action plan offers more immediate and effective relief at Logan without imposing new environmental burdens at Hanscom and other area airports. That should be good news for Hanscom, for Hanscom's neighbors ®- and for everyone who depends on Logan for safe, reliable air transportation. Cordi~lly, ~~'~~ _'~ = `~ ~-~ ,, , ~~__ Fra~;cesca de Van As~~stant Director of Public Affairs Co~orate Communication r_.- Attachments' Press Release and Charts HFAC Agenda and Minutes FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Massport, Sen. Kerry and Cong. Kennedy Announce Plan to Improve Air Safety, Service and Scheduling Contact: Phil Orlandella 5b1-1818 Francesca de Van 973-5606 BOSTON, MA -- August 27, 1987 -- Massport Executive Director David W. Davis and Massport Chairman Richard A. Giesser were joined today by Senator John F. Kerry, Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy II and State Transportation Secretary Frederick P. Salvuc.,i in announcing a major four-point plan designed to improve the margin of safety at Logan and other major airports, reduce delays and congestion at peak periods, protect the rights of air passengers, and develop a transportation policy for New England which encourages better use oL existing regional airports and alternative transportation -- including a proposed high speed rail connection between Boston and New York. Kerry, who serves on the Aviation Subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee, and Kennedy, whose district includes Logan Airport and surrounding residential neighborhoods, announced their intention to strengthen federal law confirming the right of Logan and other major airports to establish priority access for larger passenger aircraft during peak periods. "The U.S. Department of - 2 - Transportation is already contemplating new rules which would allow airports like Logan to take unilateral action to give priority to larger passenger aircraft. After a very difficult summer when even the President's personal helicopter has been involved in a near miss, DOT shouldn't wait any longer to issue those new regulations®" said Kerry, Cong. Kennedy agreed. °°DOT should become an active partner in developing a short-term plan for easing airport congestion. If the Administration doesn°t take immediate action on this critical problem, then Congress will,°° Kennedy said. '°Solving the problems of congestion at Logan will require the cooperation of the federal government,°° agreed Davis. '°Sut Massport, as a local airport operator, is determined to do whatever it can to help improve the air transportation system for the benefit of passengers at Logan International Airport." In expressing the support of the Dukakis Administration for the Massport-Kerry-Kennedy plan, State Transportation Secretary Salvucci noted that Massachusetts officials were taking a balanced and practical approach to the problem of airport congestion and delay. °°This program embraces the most direct, immediate and efficient solutions to concerns about air travel safety and delay,°° said Salvucci. °°Governor Dukakis has already begun the fight for high speed rail and for the development of a truly regional airport system. His proposals, and the program presented today, offer the best chance to enhance the safety of New England's air travelers -® and provide some quick and meaningful relief from air traffic congestion, as well." - 3 - Kerry, Kennedy, Davis, Giesser and Salvucci said their plan .:.contains four separate elements: 1. Higher Fees for Smaller Aircraft/Peak Hour Fees to Improve Safety, Reduce Delay: Massport will increase Logan's Minimum Landing Fee and establish a General Aviation Terminal Fee for all small aircraft using Logan. In addition, Massport will seek to impose a Peak-Hour Landing Fee on general and commuter aircraft. °'The most important effect of this change will be to enable more people to move through Logan in fewer airplanes,'° said Davis. °°®ur program should encourage most general aviaton operators to use one of the numerous regional airports with access to the Boston area. Those operators remaining at Logan -- particularly smaller commuter operators -- will be encouraged to use the airport at offpeak hours. The .result will be a higher level of efficiency at Logan. That should be good news to the FAA," added Davis, °'since this change will also improve air safety and congestion by the reducing the number of smaller and potentially more dangerous aircraft at L®gan s °° '°In the era of deregulation, it's time for us to recognize that access to the nation°s busiest airports is a limited and valuable resource, and that safety must take precedence over the convenience of a handful of private aircraft owners. Massport is by no means alone in reaching this conclusion: Robert Crandall, the President of American Airlines, recently testified in Washington that peak hour pricing -- as a method for allocating scarce access at busy airports -- is an idea whose time has come,°' Davis said. - 4 - '°Relief from peak-hour congestion at Logan will also depend on the airlines moving to more realistic scheduling practices," said Davis. "That°s why we are asking the DOT to join us in assessing proposals to maximize airport efficiency and runway utilization for large jet aircraft, especially during peak periods. ~Ie will be initiating a public process for full review and comment on these proposals. Massport wants a system which gives priority to the largest, quietest, most efficient aircraft,°' Davis said. 2. Better Federal Funding and Coordination for the Regional Airport Network: Massport will ask the New England FAA office to establish a special discretionary fund for regional airport assistance. °°Because of their small size, many regional airports in New England and throughout the country have difficulty gaining access to the money necessary for improving their facilities," said Davis. "The FAA has been concentrating its expenditures on the biggest airports, which are already the most crowded. Massport believes regional airports should have more access to airport improvement money -- and we're also prepared to help them, should they ask us, by providing technical assistance in marketing, planning, noise abatement and other aspects of airport management. We don't foresee a big shift in traffic to any other airport in our region,'° Davis said, °°but, by better serving the needs of the travelers in their own immediate vicinities, regional airports can play an important role in easing congestion and improving safety around Logan." - 5 - 3. An Air Passenger °'Bill of Rights:°° Massport will gather and distribute information about airline policies concerning cancellations, overbookings, lost luggage. and other service problems. "Many passengers don't know who to talk to at the airlines, or, when necessary, how to get help from state or federal consumer and legal agencies," said Congressman Kennedy. "Massport and others have asked the federal DOT to use its authority to establish a nationwide complaint and referral hot line, and to issue performance report cards for all major airlines," said Kennedy. "We believe that there should be immediate action in this area, But if the federal government isn't prepared to act,°' noted Davis; °°then Massport will set up a local system to provide information to New England travelers. In a free and open society, consumers ought to be able to make informed decisions about which airline to fly." Kennedy announced that the House Public Works Committee had already recommended that airlines be fined for failure to live up to minimum standards of service in the areas of candled flights, lost bagagge, and overbooking of seats. "Air passengers have suffered enough confusion, frustration, and indignity. Congress is going to require action in this area," said Kennedy. '°No airline lobbyist is going to be able to undermine the strong consensus we have forged on this lSSUe. P/ Davis announced that a local informational pamphlet -- a New England '°Air Passenger Bill of Rights'° would be made available to the public at all Massport information desks and through Massport's Public Affairs Department. - 6 - °°Working with our Congressional delegation, Massport will hush '°We're also asking that Congress and the ~®~ confirm the right - ~ rights, we're asking the ~ to place the same restrictions on the airspace around Boston as they have recently applied to the Dos Angeles area. ~e know the FAA is trying to provide an added measure Davis also asked the FAA to require all aircraft td use Davis further called on the F to work out an agreement with _ ~ s our problems, I think that they should stop shifting the burden to the statese The New England office of the F should be looking at the potential of possible alternative airport locations here in our Kerry also announced that he would support legislation which would keep the Airport Trust Fund from being counted as part of the Federal Eudget for purposes of debt reductions ''There's over 5 billion sitting in the Airport Trust Fund that the Reagan Administration won' t spend because it shows up in their books as a credit against the federal deficit® That money was raised by taxing airline passengers in Order to pay for improvements in the national air transportation systems it Can't be spent for any other purposem It°s time for the Department of Transportation to stop tying up this money for the sake of a phoney accounting trick, and to recognise that the Airport Tr ust Fund should no longer be counted as part of the general budgetm It's incredible that the White House should _ g - persist in trying to balance the federal budget on the backs of air travelers,'° Kerry said. Kerry called for the DOT to "get tie lead out'° on development and distribution of on-board crash alert devices (known in aside 3721D{tpc) ^~._. . m~ _. ' _ s ,y. 4 1 ~ ~® r . i _ _,~ . ~ : ~ ~ a .~ s ~~:,;i ~ %t ~ ~. ,_ 4 _ ., ~ ~ ® - ~ ~ ` a ~e`1 ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ i ,~ _ ~ ~ a' .~ - ~ v ~ .., [ _ ~ ~ tom..., ~ F i ~" -~ .~ _. ~. _ y 0 I 4 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a t B ~ i .: i® - '~ ._ ='1® (° a ~ - F- ~ ', ., . - ~ ~ , ~ - ®t: ® ~ ~;; ~ ~ ~. ~' ~ ' p ~. 3 ~ ~ ' ~ 6 _i . ~ [.. Y ~-:~ -._ ~~ ~- i ~~, ,_?i ~: F l ~ ~ ~' ~`d .~_ 3 r '' :, ~ ~, t '~~ ~'~ I ~ F~~+~ 1 '~~ P~.. j k~ ~ 'jam _e. ~3~ Wit) ?,~ :. s v 1 ~Y 3 - r _ ~.m i i C_,-~. _=~T nit Y` r.~ . 4,ty ~ yT' 1 ,~,.~ Fy ~ ~~~ '~' ~- M. _._:, ~ ~ -•.-• ~ 1 ~'~ ~ _ !~' 0 i®°'7 D =} i ' ~ ~ . ~ - ~ g_._ `_._~3 p ':.-. -. - .. { ~ s s ~ f ~. - m ~ P "'i ~ 8 8 F ~ E. __ 1 j 1 ~ ~ g ¢ ;~ fl a J ~~ '.1 aa i t -. - ---~ - ._' ~ ~ - ~ ~ 1~ , ^ '-"9 ® .~ t `~ ~ ~ N - ' & '_ ' ~ ~ ',) ~ ®ID 1 _,,.7 ~;'-~ ~•,. ~ _ ~ __. Y _ A ~ ~ I i V ~,~ 1 S ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ® $ 8 5' _ _ , 6="~ ~ l® J'a T~J ..~ 3 a i "~ _~, ~` -.~ . L A ~-,L . ~ - ~ v r--~ ~ d! d ~m '°"~ `'D ~- :~' '~ ~~ _~ ~ Y::~~-! ~' j', ®. ~ ':® t-:_ ® ~ ® ~~ ® ~. ~.-,' i ', ®-. ®. 1 e .-~-s °~ ~ ' -~, ~' _. ® ® ~ air::, ~.~~~® Q,~., m ® 9 ~:,T -~, ,w :, ~_.: ~_- `. , ;~ q r-t- ~ r ® ®. ~ ~ ~ . -~ ® ~ ® ~- ® ~ ~ . ~' ® ~- _ ~ a ~ -~® ® -~ ~~~ ~- a r a g .' ~'