Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-09-09-PB-min PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2020 Minutes of the Lexington Planning Board Held on September 9, 2020, Virtual Meeting per Governor Baker’s Order at 7:00 pm Present: Robert Creech, Chair; Robert Peters, Vice-Chair; Ginna Johnson, Clerk; Richard Canale; and Charles Hornig. Also present was Amanda Loomis, Planning Director. Robert Creech, Chair, read the agenda into the record, introduced members of the Planning Board and Planning Department Staff, and called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. on Wednesday, September 9, 2020. Mr. Creech read the following statement relative to the recent outbreak of COVID-19. Good evening. This meeting of the Lexington Planning Board is being conducted remotely consistent with Governor Baker’s Executive Order of March 12, 2020, due to the current State of Emergency in the Commonwealth due to the outbreak of COVID-19. To mitigate the transmission of COVID-19, we have been advised and directed by the Commonwealth to suspend public gatherings. As such, the Governor’s Order suspends the requirement of the Open Meeting Law to have all meetings in a publicly accessible physical location. Further, all members of public bodies are allowed and encouraged to participate remotely. The Order, which you can find posted with agenda materials for this meeting, allows public bodies to meet entirely remotely so long as reasonable public access is afforded so that the public can follow along with the deliberations of the meeting. Ensuring public access does not guarantee public participation unless such participation is required by law. This meeting will feature a public comment. For this meeting, the Lexington Planning Board is convening by video conference via Zoom as posted on the Town’s Website identifying how the public may join. Please note that this meeting is being recorded and that some attendees are participating by video conference. Accordingly, please be aware that other folks may see you, and take care not to “screen share” your computer. The recording may capture anything that you broadcast. 1. Town Meeting a. Amend Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing-Distance from Basement, Slab or Crawl Space and Groundwater: Add a new §135-4.5 entitled Distance from Basement, Slab or Crawl Space and Groundwater Present for the Public Hearing: James Kelly, Lexington Building Commissioner Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for Article 9 and requested a presentation from Mr. Kelly. Mr. Kelly presented a PowerPoint presentation entitled Article 9: Amend Zoning Bylaw – Distance from Basement, Slab or Crawl Space, and Groundwater. The presentation identified the problem that Article 9 intends to address; the potential solution to the Page 2 Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 problem; a review of examples relevant to discharging of water without proper planning, pumping water into the street, sewer, and drainage system; the need for engineering review; a review of conditions and requirements that Article 9 proposes; a review of comments received from builders; and a summary of the intent for the submitted article. Mr. Creech requested clarification regarding a developer to lift a foundation out of the water, but rather for a developer not to build in the groundwater. Mr. Kelly confirmed that Mr. Creech was correct. Mr. Creech requested comments from members of the Planning Board. The following comments were provided.  Richard Canale stated that he did not have any comments, and the Article looked good.  Ginna Johnson requested clarification about how the two (2) feet depth is measured to ensure there are no questions. Mr. Kelly provided a review of the margin of error to take into consideration.  Robert Peters requested clarification as to how do the two (2) feet compare to other comparable communities doing whether bylaw. Mr. Kelly stated that other communities are using one (1) foot, and provided clarification regarding the proposed two (2) feet separation. Mr. Peters thanked Mr. Kelly for his efforts and stated that he supports this Article.  Mr. Creech stated that he supports the Article. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comment. The following comments were provided.  A request for clarification regarding a fixed reference point for comparison for abutting properties. The request for clarification was followed by a question about issues with the lack to compare abutting properties elevation measurements.  It appears that there was an amendment made to the draft Bylaw since the Spring 2020 edition, which makes the language stronger.  A request for clarification as to when this proposal would become effective. Mr. Kelly stated that it would be the date of the legal advertisement in the local paper. Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Article 9, Distance from Basement, Slab or Crawl Space, and Groundwater to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Ginna Johnson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll Call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Robert Creech – yes) MOTION PASSED b. Amend Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing-Short Term Rentals: Add a new section to §135-6, entitled Short Term Rentals Present for the public hearing: Jennifer Gingras, Zoning Administrator Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for Article 10 and requested a presentation from Ms. Gingras. Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 Page 3 Ms. Gingras presented a PowerPoint presentation entitled Amend Zoning Bylaw – Short Term Rentals (STR). The presentation highlighted the proposed regulations relative to Short Term Rentals, which included a review of the Problem, the Solution, overview, and registration of a Short Term Rental, the difference between Operator-Occupied and Operator-Adjacent units, and Short Term Rental Options. Mr. Creech requested comments from the Planning Board. The following comments were provided.  Charles Hornig, Robert Peters, Richard Canale did not have any questions and supported the Article.  Ginna Johnson stated that she also supported this article and commented on a graphic in the presentation for clarification.  Mr. Creech also stated that he supports the Article, but requested clarification regarding the regulations relative to the renting of a unit no more than 90 days. Ms. Gingras explained the 90-day limitation. Mr. Creech asked for further clarification in the presentation for clarity. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comments. The following comments were provided.  A member of the public provided a review of three topics of concern for the resident. These topics include Commercial Events Prohibited; limit of occupancy to 10 guests or two guests per bedroom; a limitation of outdoor space no later than 9 pm. Ms. Gingras responded to the three issues. The Planning Board discussed three potential amendments presented by a member of the public relative to noise, number of guests, and use of the property for commercial uses. Ms. Gingras provided a review of the draft Short Term Rental Regulations, which addressed several of the concerns identified by the resident.  A statement identifying the concerns previously identified. The resident stated that he operates a responsible Short Term Rental and requested additional clarification about what would be allowed to be rented out. A further request for clarification as to how 90 days is calculated. A question as to what happens in the event of a violation. Ms. Gingras stated that there are fees, and also the Short Term Rental application would not be renewed.  A request for clarification as to how to address the 90 days rule. The Planning Board guided the request for the proposal to be more flexible relative to the 90 days.  A statement or concern about Short Term Rentals and that she wanted to live next to a hotel she would have. The resident further thanked Ms. Gingras for all her efforts and the Planning Board for taking this very seriously. Mr. Creech questioned if any Planning Board members had any additional comments.  Mr. Peters stated that if the Town requires a rental log, then the Town should put parameters around it. Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Article 10, Short Term Rentals to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Ginna Johnson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the Page 4 Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 motion 5-0-0 (Roll Call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Robert Creech – yes) MOTION PASSED 2. Development Administration a. 11 and 17 Carley Road – Approval Not Required The Planning Board briefly reviewed the Plan of land for 11 and 17 Carley Road. No comments were made. Ginna Johnson moved that the Planning Board endorse the Plan of Land for the Approval Not Required (ANR) application for the property located at 11 and 17 Carley Road. Richard Canale seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll Call: Richard Canale – yes; Ginna Johnson – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Robert Creech – yes). MOTION PASSED 3. Town Meeting a. Amend the Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing – Site Plan Review: delete §135-9.5.2 Applicability; amend §135-9.5.4.3; and delete §135-9.5.6.6 in its entirety Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for Article 11 and requested a presentation from Charles Hornig. Mr. Hornig provided an overview of the proposed amendments for Article 11. Mr. Hornig noted the changes and reasoning for each of the proposed changes. Mr. Creech requested comments from the Planning Board. The following comments were made:  Robert Peters stated that he did not have any comments at this time.  Richard Canale stated his concerns regarding the lack of notice to residents. Mr. Canale reviewed the thresholds relative to requiring site plan review, and there should be a limit for a project over 30,000SF. Mr. Hornig reviewed the process of notice and options for amending the public notice process.  Charles Hornig provided clarification regarding options for advertising and the limited timeframe for a project review. Mr. Hornig further discussed thresholds and requested a language that achieves proper assessment of a project.  Ginna Johnson reviewed the project threshold size by giving examples of projects that should have Town review.  Mr. Hornig and Mr. Canale discussed a proper timeline for legal notice to abutters. Mr. Canale suggested notification be sent two weeks before the public hearing.  Mr. Creech supported Mr. Canale's suggestion of legal notice to residents two weeks before the opening public hearing. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comment. No public comment was made. Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 Page 5 Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Site Plan Review to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Ginna Johnson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll Call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Robert Creech – yes) MOTION PASSED b. Amend the Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing – Financial Services: Amend §135-3.1.6; amend Table 1, Permitted Uses and Development Standards row H.1.05, delete row H.1.06 and H.1.07, and add a new row H.2.03; amend §135-10.1, definitions. Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for the Financial Services Town Meeting Article. Mr. Creech stated that the Center Committee voted unanimously 7-0-0 to support the Article last week. Charles Hornig presented a brief overview of Article 12, Financial Services. Mr. Hornig stated such an article is in reaction to recent business practices around the operation of banks. Mr. Creech requested comments from the Planning Board. The following comments were provided.  Robert Peters stated that he has no questions and that he supported this article in the spring and still does.  Richard Canale stated that he has no questions.  Ginna Johnson requested clarification regarding the name of the Article. Mr. Hornig explained as to why they cannot change the name. Ms. Johnson stated that she supports this Article.  Mr. Creech stated that he supported this Article and was grateful for the additional time. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comment. No public comments were provided. Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Financial Services to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Robert Peters seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 4-0-0 (Roll Call: Robert Peters – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Creech – yes) MOTION PASSED Note: Ms. Johnson lost connection during the vote of the Article, but was present during the entire discussion of the Article. c. Amend the Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing – Solar Energy Systems: Amend §135-3.2.2; add a new §135-4.3.1.3; amend §135-10.1 Definitions, by adding new definitions relative to Solar Energy Systems; Amend Table 1, Permitted Uses and Development Standards by deleting the existing O.1.10 and adding four new rows (O.1.10, O.1.11, O.1.12, and O.1.13): add a new section to §135-6, Solar Energy Systems; and add a new §135-7.3.4 Protected Uses. Page 6 Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for Article 13 and requested a presentation from Charles Hornig. Mr. Hornig provided an overview of the proposed amendments for Article 13, via PowerPoint presentation. The PowerPoint presentation entitled Article 13, Solar Energy Systems included a review of Why This Change?, Types of Systems, Building-mounted, Canopy, Residential, Large-scale, Other Changes, Common Questions, Future Work. Mr. Hornig stated that Article 13 is the same zoning article that the Planning Board supported the Spring of 2020. Mr. Creech requested comments from the Planning Board. The following comments were provided.  Richard Canale requested clarification about when a residential solar installation becomes commercial and is the community comfortable with commercial use in residential neighborhoods?  Ginna Johnson stated her concerns regarding the impacts to mature tree canopies. Ms. Johnson noted that the Planning Board prohibited large-scale solar installations on the side, rear, and front setbacks. Mr. Hornig confirmed that such uses are still banned from the Bylaw.  Robert Peters stated that he supported this Article in the spring and still does now.  Mr. Creech stated his concerns regarding the size of a ground-mounted solar installation within proximity to residential uses. Mr. Creech noted that there would be additional research for a proposal for the residential ground mounted uses for an Annual Town Meeting of 2021. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comments. The following comments were provided.  A statement was made regarding the Sol Smart evaluation recently conducted on the proposed Bylaw.  A statement regarding a project when a residential directly abuts a commercial property. What is being done to mitigate impacts on residential property? Mr. Creech requested additional comments from the Planning Board. The following comments were provided.  Mr. Canale stated his concerns regarding the effects on health relative to the loss of tree canopy.  Ms. Johnson stated her concerns regarding a quick reaction to embrace new energy sustainability options. Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Solar Energy Systems to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Ginna Johnson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 Page 7 Call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Creech – yes) MOTION PASSED d. Amend the Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing – Wireless Communication Facilities: Amend row O.1.08 of Table 1, Permitted Uses and Development Standards; amend §135-96.4 Wireless Communication Facilities; amend §135-9.4.1.1.c; amend §135-10.1 Definitions, relative to Wireless Communication Facilities. Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for Article 14 and requested a presentation from Charles Hornig. Mr. Hornig provided an overview of the proposed amendments for Article 14. Mr. Hornig presented a PowerPoint presentation that provided an overview of Why this change? and What is being offered. Mr. Creech requested comments from the Planning Board. The following comments were provided.  Robert Peters stated that he did not have any questions.  Richard Canale requested clarification of a question proposed in February regarding consistency between private land and public land relative to Wireless Communication. Mr. Hornig provided clarification of the dovetailing of the two regulation efforts. Mr. Canale requested guidance from the Communications Advisory Committee.  Ginna Johnson provided a review of her observations of such infrastructure and the concerns about potential impacts on the environment.  Mr. Hornig stated that the current regulations in the Zoning Bylaws are currently in violation of federal regulations.  Mr. Canale requested clarification about how many communities have been rushing to amend their regulations to their bylaws and ordinances. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comment. The following comments were made.  Mr. Pogran of the Communications Advisory Committee spoke in favor of the proposed Article, noting that the Communications Advisory Committee worked in the Spring of 2020 with Mr. Hornig to finalize the submitted Article, and Lexington is presently behind the curve with the Federal Regulations. Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Wireless Communication Facilities to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Ginna Johnson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll Call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Creech – yes) MOTION PASSED e. Amend the Zoning Bylaw Public Hearing – Technical Corrections: Amend §135-4.1.1 Table 2, Schedule of Dimensional Controls, line “Minimum side yard in feet.” Page 8 Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 Robert Creech, Chair, opened the public hearing for Article 15 and provided a brief review of the proposed Article. Mr. Creech requested comments from the Planning Board. The Planning Board reviewed and discussed the proposed amendments to the Lexington Zoning Bylaw, relative to the Technical Corrections Article. All members of the Planning Board supported Article 15: Technical Corrections as presented. Mr. Creech opened the floor for public comments. No comments were provided. Robert Creech moved that the Planning Board continue the public hearing for Technical Corrections to Wednesday, September 23, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. Ginna Johnson seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll Call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Robert Creech – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Charles Hornig – yes) MOTION PASSED 4. Board Administration a. Board Member Updates  Ms. Loomis provided a brief reminder about the meetings scheduled for September 14, 2020.  Richard Canale requested a summary regarding follow-up with the Select Board and the Chair of the Select Board regarding the Hartwell Rezoning Initiative, in addition any agreements, discussion, etc. The Planning Board discussed the Hartwell Rezoning Initiative, in addition to housing within the area. b. Upcoming Meeting and Anticipated Schedule th  Ms. Loomis provided a review of the scheduled meetings on September 14 and rd 23. Ms. Loomis wanted to know if the Planning Board wanted to schedule thth meetings on September 30 and October 7. c. Review of the Planning Board Meeting Minutes of August 26, 2020 The Planning Board continued reviewing August 26, 2020, Planning Board minutes to September 14, 2020. Adjournment Ginna Johnson moved that the Planning Board adjourn the meeting of September 9, 2020. Robert Peters seconded the motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0 (Roll call: Ginna Johnson – yes; Robert Peters – yes; Richard Canale – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Creech - yes). MOTION PASSED Meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Ginna Johnson, Clerk of the Planning Board The following documents used at the meeting can be found on the Planning Board website in Planning Board packets. 11 &17 Carley Road ANR:  Application plan dated September 2, 2020 (5 pages).  Plan set dated August 26, 2020 (1 page). Minutes for the Meeting of September 9, 2020 Page 9 Town Meeting articles all dated September 9, 2020:  Draft Report Groundwater (2 pages).  Draft Report Short Term Rentals (3 pages).  Draft Report Site Plan Review (2 pages).  Draft Report Financial Services (2 pages).  Draft Report Solar Energy Systems (4 pages).  Draft Report Wireless Communication Facilities (7 pages).  Draft Report Technical Corrections (1 page). Ginna Johnson, Clerk of the Planning Board