HomeMy WebLinkAbout2038.12 Letter, Attorney Smith & Ludden to George E. Muzzey concerning the Lexington-Waltham line, March 14, 1895 E. IRVING SMITH, CHARLES M. LUDDEN.
OFFICE OF
SMITH & LUDDEN,
COUNSELLORS AT LAW,
5 PEMBERTON SQUARE,
ROOMS 25 & 26,
BOSTON.
Bo st or., Mass., Mar . 14, 1 S951.
Geo1-•E;e E. T:luszey, Esq. ,
LexinSrton, T,iass .
Dear ir. -
We wen- sornj today that ,you did not f izid ��hr ., SMi th or I;%' .
Ludden in when you called to inquire ,bout the proposed act in relation
to the lines betweel'l Wdtlaam and Lexington. Vie do not regard the
Tratter as of annyr consequence to Lexington else we should have sent you
word before this . The cite engineer of Waltham reciuested this to be
done and without aiX;, invest it at ion on the part of anybody we rut in the
usup-1 petition which calls for a statute- authorizi� ; the comr�issi.oners
on t,opo raphical_ survey to establish the lines between Waltham and
Lexin,ton. There have been a- nur:ber of such acts introduced this win-
ter the _purpose 'Hein, to establish the town bounds loy this cornr.is i.on,
If your rights are in any wkv to be Offected the proper place for the
hearing will. come before the corrmissioI ers on topo,raphic��l survey.
The proposed act is introduced for the purpose o f wathos izin ty, is
corunission to act and �-kTe see no possible reason why Lexi-ig{ on should
object to this . If, howa,. er, you object to •it LL. aWr my please let us
know at once and it can probablzr '-)e arranged to your saticfac:ti on.
The he grin, on the Car. -ge wat er act i s as si,.tied for next 1 io�i—La T
forenoon. IVe have written to Mr. Smith in regard to it azi C1 we would
very mAich like to have the whole boarr come in i_t you can because it
shows an intlerest in the matter which is likel-\7 to have some effect on
the Cormit. �� VeY'y tl�zi � ;��'Urs,