HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-03-05-AHTBT-min.pdf
Page 1 of 4
Affordable Housing Trust
Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2026, 10:00 am
Hybrid meeting on Zoom and attended in-person in the Select Board Meeting
Room, Town Office Building
Affordable Housing Trust Board Members present: Elaine Tung, Chair; Linda Prosnitz, William
Erickson, Mark Sandeen, Tiffany Payne
Ms. Tung chaired the hybrid meeting and called the meeting to order at 10:02 am.
1. Approve Meeting Minutes
Ms. Tung requested a motion to approve the meeting minutes of 10/09/25, 02/04/26 Open
session, and 02/04/26 Executive session. Mr. Erickson moved. Ms. Payne seconded. The Trustees
voted in favor of the motion 5-0-0, by a roll call vote (Payne – yes, Erickson – yes, Prosnitz -yes,
Sandeen – yes, Tung – yes). Meeting minutes approved.
2. Chair, Select Board, Board/Committee Liaison and RHSO/staff report
Ms. Payne stated that the Lexington Housing Authority will meet the following week and she will
share the updates after the meeting.
Ms. Prosnitz reported that the Housing Partnership Board met and the four subgroups are
preparing presentations for the Select Board. Ms. Prosnitz stated that the Housing Partnership
was looking at strategies on how to get to the real 10% affordable units and that they were
exploring options to have all affordable overlay in certain districts. Ms. Prosnitz said that the
Housing Partnership Board came to same conclusion as the Affordable Housing Trust that the
Town-owned parcels are too small for any real development. Ms. Tung added that the Housing
Partnership Board is also discussing retaining smaller units in Town, promoting housing in the
Center, and that it is working on a website.
Mr. Erickson updated that LexHAB is planning to have their annual fundraiser on March 27, 2026.
Ms. Tung shared Ms. Kowalski’s staff update: At the Planning Board’s March 11, 2026, they will
be discussing the project at 419 Marrett Road with a proposal for 9 condominiums. Ms. Tung
added that the Planning Board will also discuss 475 Bedford Street for which hearing had been
continued. Ms. Kowalski also reminded the Trust about the MHP Strengthening Boards series for
the Trustees to attend.
Ms. Tung updated that the Affordable Housing Trust (AHT) would be appearing before the Select
Board on March 16, 2026, to discuss the pilot Rental Assistance Program.
Mr. Sandeen shared that the Select Board is expecting to consider approval of a draft letter of
support from the Select Board for state financing of the Lowell and North Street project to be
presented at the Select Board meeting on March 16, 2026.
3. 2026 Town Meeting Warrant Article 25
Matt Daggett, Proponent
Mr. Daggett gave a brief overview of Article 25 and explained that the specific purpose of Article
25 was to reauthorize Article 6 of 2020 Town Meeting, see king special legislation to enact a
surcharge on lots where a single- or two-family house has been demolished and redeveloped.
Page 2 of 4
The surcharge would be calculated based on square footage at a rate determined by the Select
Board and collected fees would be deposited in the Affordable Housing Trust fund.
Ms. Payne wanted to know the details of the number of teardowns/rebuilds that occur in a year.
Mr. Daggett responded that it is between 80 to 100 per year.
Ms. Tung asked Mr. Daggett to share details on the number of single family and two-family
teardowns to get a better idea of the scale of proposed revenue. Mr. Daggett stated that there
were very few two-family teardowns compared to single family teardowns and shared potential
revenue numbers based on different rates of surcharge. Mr. Daggett also stated that his models
were based on the rate of teardown and the size of the replacement from 2020.
Ms. Prosnitz wanted clarification on the language of the Article and the basis for arriving at the
rate of surcharge. Ms. Prosnitz also wanted to know if any other community has conducted a
Nexus Study related to this proposed Article and questioned the timing of the proposed Nexus
Study. Mr. Daggett clarified that a Nexus Study for a similar proposal has not been done in
Massachusetts but there were a few in other states. Ms. Prosnitz sought clarifications on how
the surcharge could be added to property taxes and how abatement would work. Mr. Daggett
provided a detailed explanation based on different use cases.
Mr. Sandeen shared that Town staff had questions about the implementation details and stated
that the Building Commissioner preferred the fee to be due with the building permit application
as opposed to prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Town staff also preferred a one-
time payment as opposed to the 20% payment over a period of five years along with the property
tax. Mr. Daggett added that the Town has the flexibility to determine the timing of the payment
and he was working with Finance staff to determine the best payment option.
Ms. Tung wondered if the purpose of the Article was to fund the AHT or to prevent teardowns.
Mr. Daggett explained that the main purpose is to generate revenue and not to preclude
redevelopment. Ms. Tung wanted to make sure that the cost of the Nexus Study was paid before
any funds were given to the AHT.
Jay Luker expressed his concern that the surcharge could significantly increase the total cost of
construction. Mr. Dagget explained that the numbers presented are arbitrary and the surcharge
rate would be based on what the Select Board decides to implement, and a Nexus Study would
help make an informed decision. Mr. Luker wanted to know how many abatement situations
were included in the model calculations and Mr. Daggett responded that he did not add any
abatements in his calculations.
Tom Shiple commented that this Article would lead to loss of modest housing in the community
and that if the goal was to generate funding for community housing, the surcharge should be
charged not only to teardowns but also to new constructions.
4. LexHAB Grant Appliction
LexHAB, Applicant
Mr. Erickson recused himself from the discussion.
Tara Mizrahi and Russ Tanner, LexHAB Board members, and Sarah Morrison, Executive Director,
attended on behalf of LexHAB.
The Trustees continued their discussion from their last meeting with LexHAB and clarified the
questions they had on LexHAB’s grant application.
Mr. Sandeen asked if LexHAB had received any updates from EOHLC. Ms. Mizrahi shared that the
representatives from EOHLC visited all the locations specified in the grant application and that
LexHAB will be submitting their application to EOHLC before the March 19, 2026, deadline.
LexHAB is hoping for an early award and shared the timeline of events. Mr. Sandeen sought
clarification on why Sedge Road was removed from the application. Mr. Tanner responded that
Page 3 of 4
6 Sedge Road was swapped with 300 Woburn Street due to the presence of wetlands on the
Sedge Road property and that the wetlands could not be flagged in time for the application with
EOHLC.
Ms. Payne wanted to know LexHAB’s plans in the event they did not get the award or if the award
was delayed. Ms. Mizrahi stated that, in that event, LexHAB would come back to the AHT for
consideration. Ms. Payne expressed her concern about not including the washer and dryer in the
units and asked if it could be included as part of the development costs. Ms. Mizrahi stated that
LexHAB’s policy across its entire policy is not to include washers and dryers in any of its units. Ms.
Payne shared the concern about the disruptions to the current tenants at 300 Woburn Street due
to construction. Ms. Mizrahi stated that since the ADU is modular, there will be minimum
inconvenience to the current tenants during the ADU construction. Ms. Mizrahi offered to share
the engagement plans with current tenants so that everyone will stay informed.
Ms. Prosnitz wanted clarification on who will be paying property taxes, especially with the change
in LexHAB’s status to 501(c)(3). Ms. Morrison stated that as part of the agreement with the Town,
LexHAB does not pay any real estate taxes. Ms. Prosnitz sought clarification on whether the
rehabilitation of Douglas Road was included in the Pro Forma.
Ms. Tung shared the Sources and Uses funds of the LexHAB grant application and asked if the 7%
construction contingency, if unused would be returned to the Trust. Ms. Mizrahi stated that
typically if there are any savings, the developer/owner keeps half, and the other half goes to the
funding agencies. Ms. Tung also asked if there will be an owner’s project manager and if the total
development cost would be around $528,000. Mr. Tanner confirmed that it was correct.
Ms. Prosnitz asked for a comprehensive financial statement to get a better understanding of the
portfolio. Mr. Tanner stated that when looking at the whole portfolio as an operating pro forma,
which would exclude some unpredictable revenue sources, it would barely break even. Ms.
Prosnitz also asked for clarification on how the vouchers will be used on LexHAB’s properties. Ms.
Mizrahi explained the process in detail.
The Trustees felt that the AHT should support this grant application and it was a good opportunity
to leverage funds from the State. The Trustees agreed that this is a creative approach to creating
more affordable houses with accessory dwelling units and using state housing vouchers to lower
income affordability.
Ms. Tung moved that the AHT approve a conditional commitment to LexHAB for $1,000,000 for
the construction and renovation of three Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) at 300 Woburn
Street, 2-3 Spencer Road, 77 Wood Street, as well as the renovation of the existing single family
home at 77 Woods Street consistent with the Project Proposal presented by LexHAB to the
Trust. The conditions include the following: 1) funding awards from EOHLC consistent with
project proposal as submitted in LexHAB’s application at a level sufficient to proceed with th e
project; 2) The AHT’s satisfactory review and approval of final construction costs, overall
development budget and funding sources for the project, r ent commitments or other
explanations satisfactory to the AHT for all identified funding sources for the project ; 3)
submission of final building and site plans, and specifications for construction at each of the
above proposed locations; 4) submission of a fair housing marketing plan and tenant selection
plan for the new units; 5) updated development schedule; 6) updated listing of the maximum
income levels not to exceed 60% AMI and rent policy for each of the new units ; 7) contractor
information to be submitted to the AHT; 8) all units to meet requirements to be added to the
Town’s Subsidized Housing Inventory; 9) satisfactory, draw schedule and administration plan
to be mutually agreed upon; and 10) LexHAB to consider prioritizing MBE/WBE contractors
where appropriate; 11) LexHAB to evaluate its policy regarding washers and dryers for these
four units; and 12) LexHAB to provide an engagement plan with tenants to be moving in or
existing tenants that currently live or will be affected at the units. Ms. Tung stated that the
Trust is in support of LexHAB’s application for capital and operating subsidies prioritizing those
Page 4 of 4
tenants who have extremely low income and very low income. Mr. Sandeen seconded. The
Trustees voted in favor of the motion 4-0-0, by roll call vote (Payne – yes, Sandeen – yes,
Prosnitz – yes, Tung – yes).
The above motion was amended to include the following. Ms. Tung made a motion that the
Affordable Housing Trust authorizes the Chair to write the commitment letter to be provided
to EOHLC for LexHAB. Ms. Prosnitz seconded. The Trustees voted in favor of the motion 4-0-0,
by roll call vote (Payne – yes, Sandeen – yes, Prosnitz – yes, Tung – yes).
Ms. Tung requested a motion to authorize the AHT Chair to update the Project Eligibility
Support Letter for the Lexington Woods project to reflect the Trust’s support for Causeway
Development’s application to EOHLC, and the ZBA approval of Comprehensive Permit for the
project. Mr. Sandeen moved. Ms. Payne seconded. The Trustees voted in favor of the motion
4-0-0, by roll call vote (Payne – yes, Sandeen – yes, Prosnitz – yes, Tung – yes).
5. Executive Session
Ms. Tung moved to go into Executive session under Exemption 6 to consider the purchase or
lease of real property regarding MBTA Multi -Family Development Buy-downs. The Affordable
Housing Trust Chair stated that, in her opinion, an open session would have a detrimental
effect on the negotiating position of the Town and Affordable Housing Trust. Ms. Tung stated
that the Trust will not reconvene in the open session after the Executive session. Ms. Prosnitz
and Ms. Payne seconded. The Trustees voted in favor of the motion 4-0-0, by a roll call vote
(Payne-yes, Sandeen – yes, Prosnitz – yes, Tung – yes).
The Trust exited the open session at 11:58 am.
List of documents reviewed
1. LexHAB grant application