HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-01-31-BOS-min is 042
SET,F^TMTN1S IE^RING I
January 31, 1962
The Board of Selectmen held a hearing in Estabrook
Hall, Cary Memorial Building, on Wednesday, January 31,
1962, at 8 :00 P.M. Chairman Morey, Mr. Adams , Mr. John .
Carroll, Superintendent of Public Works -and Town Engineer,
Mr. Guy Colella, = ssistant Superintendent of Public Works ,
Mr. Robert Higgins, Assistant Town Engineer, and Miss
Murray, the Executive Clerk, were preesnt .
The hearing was called to order by Mr . Adams , who
acted as Chairman. He introduced Mrs . Morey and Mr.
Carroll, and explained that the hearings were being held
for the purpose of making and establishing layouts of
the streets to be presented to the Annual Town Meeting
in March. He stated that notices of intention of th.:
Board to pass orders for the extensions , layouts and re-
locations had. been delivered by Constable to all pro-
perty owners as they appear on the most recent tax list ,
He explained that each property owner would be given an
opportunity to see the plans and register opposition if
they so wished, and that the final decision as to whether
or not the streets will be accepted is made by the Town •
Meeting Members .
The first street taken up was Albemarle Avenue from
Rawson Avenue a distance of 170 feet, more or less, north-
^lbemarle easterly to Anthony Road.
Avenue No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Albemarle Avenue was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Anthony Road from
Albemarle Avenue northwesterly a distance of 320 feet
Anthony to Lillian Road.
Road No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Anthony Road wag declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Gerard Terrace from
Cedar Street westerrly a distance of 303 .53 feet to its
terminus . No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and
Gerard the hearing on Gerard Terrace was declared closed.
Terrace
Hearing was declared open on Turning Mill Road from
a point about 71 feet, more or less, from the westerly
side line of Demar Road a distance of 656.57 feet westerly
Turning Mill and northerly.
Road The Chairman read a letter from the Turning Mill --
Associates advising that the members of the association
0
400
were in accord with the Board ' s intent and hoped that
there would be no obstacle to having the road accepted
by the Town.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Turning Mill Road was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Lillian Road from a
point 675 feet from the westerly side line of Lowell
Street and running southwesterly a distance of 1076 Lillian Road
Lillian feet , more or less .
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Lillian Road was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Rindge Avenue from
Rawson Avenue southerly a distance of 1035 feet, more
or less,-to terminus . Rindge Avenu
Mr. Michael W. Aquaro, 48 Rindge Avenue , asked about
the installation of a sanitary sewer and said that there
is a distance between numbers 48 and 40 without sewer.
Mr. Carroll said that according to the Town records
a sewer has been installed in the street but if there is
only a short distance without it , the Town could install
it before the street is paved.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Rindge Avenue was declared closed .
Hearing was declared open on Justin Street from
Bernard Street northwesterly a distance of 685 feet,
more or less , to Eldred Street . Justin Stree
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Justin Street was declared closed .
Hearing was declared open on Tarbell Avenue from
Tucker Avenue southwesterly a distance of 775 feet,
more or less , to terminus .
Mr.Louis C. Carota, P)1 Tarbell Avenue , asked if the
hearing meant that the street would be accepted whether
the people wanted it or not . Tarbell Ave .
The Chairmen replied that the hearing is to allow
the abutters to ask questions and to be recorded in
favor or in opposition. He explained that only the
Town Meeting Members can decide on the acceptance .
Mr. Frank E. Davis , Jr. , 59 Tarbell [venue, asked
when the work would be done .
Mr. Carroll replied that all streets to be done
under the Betterment Act would go into one contract
which would be let some time in the late spring and he
hoped the work would be started in the early summer.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Tarbell Avenue was declared closed .
cdp
^°C
it
Hearing was declared open on Winn Avenue from Bow
Winn Avenue Street easterly a distance of 140 feet to Rindge Avenue .
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Winn Avenue was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Winthropoad from
Waltham Street easterly, a distance of 1146 feet, more
or less , to Sherburne Road.
Mr. Hugo R. Maienza, 45 Winthrop Road, asked if
the hearing meant street lights would be installed.
The Chairman replied that installation of street
lights does not come under street construction. He
Winthrop Rd. said the Board would try to have the lights installed.
Mr. Edward Anderson, 47 Winthrop Road, asked if
sidewalks would be included and the Chairman replied
in the negative .
Mr. Anderson said the street is used by the High
School students and is dangerous in the winter.
The Chairman said that sidewalk work is done under
a different contract andhis question relative to side-
walks would be recorded..
No one spoke in favor or in opposition, and the
hearing on Winthrop Road was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Lexington Avenue from
Follen Road a distanc e . of 932 feet , more or less,
northerly to Locust Avenue .
Mrs . Edith J. Morris, 4 Robbins Road, asked if the
present finished area would be widened.
Mr. Carroll replied in the negative and explained
that it is planned to keep the width of the pavement
approximately the same .
;exington Mr . James J. Campbell, 16 Lexington Avenue , said
Avenue that he thought there were sixteen residents on this
street and half of then are on corner lots . He asked
if the assessment was on the longer side and Mr . Carroll
replied in the affirmative .
Mr. Campbell asked if the balance of the cost was
divided among those not on corner lots .
Mr . Carroll replied that in this case the Town will
absorb a large portion of the cost because a great deal
of the cost will go into drainage for Follen Road and
Locust Avenue , on either end. He said the balance of
the cost, excluding that, would be assessed against the
properties being bettered.
Mr. Campbell said that on this street where only 50%
of the people will absorb 90% of the cost, it could cost
him $;✓2,000 .
Mr. Carroll explained that he would not be charged ss
more than $10 per foot in any instance as betterments
itdug
cannot be assessed greater than the estimated betterment .
He said that , by law, a betterment cannot be assessed for
more than the estimate , but it may be less that the esti-
mate . He said that a large portion of the $15,000 will
be for drainage on Locust Avenue and Follen Road and would
not be charged to the abutters .
The Chairman explained that when the contract has
been let and the cost comes in, the abutters pay not more
than the actual cost.
Mr. Carroll said he thought it was within the power
of the Board to make partial abatements if the situation
is such that it feels the cost to fit abutters is high.
Mrs . Rose Steinhauser, 9 Lexington Avenue , asked
the location of the drainage on Locust Avenue .
Mr . Carroll relied that Lexington Avenue has been
under discussion only a short time and the plans are not
ready. He said under ordinary circumstances, the drain-
age would be brought up to within 300 feet of the highest
point in the road.
Mrs . Steinhauser asked where the catch basin would
be and Mr. Carroll replied that it would be on the side
of the street.
Mr. Edward Anderson, 47 Winthrop Road, said that
there is a right-of-way between lots 223 and 225 on Winthrop
Road and asked if anything was to be done with that .
Mr. Carroll asked if he was referring to the access
to the school and Mr. Anderson relied in the affirmative .
Mr. Carroll said there is nothing contemplated at
the present time .
No one else wished to speak in favor or in opposition
and the hearing on Lexington Avenue was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on Richard Road from a
point about 70 feet, more or less, from the westerly side
line of Plymouth Road, a distance of 1015 feet, more or
less, westerly and southwesterly to Follen Road. Richard Road
The Chairman read a letter, signed by residents of
the road, registering objection tothe proposed layout
of the road in the area now owned by the Tower Estates
from Follen Road to No. 18 Richard Road. The letter
stated that the signers would be willing to arrange .
with the Tower Estates to take the fee in Richard Road
to the middle of the street for the width of their lot
frontage , and to share the cost of making plans and
drawing deeds for the exchange , providing the cost did
not exceed $50 a lot .
Mr . Merton H. Jillson, 20 Richard Road, asked how
Tally signatures were on the letter and the Chairman read
288
--C
the names .
Mr . Frederick T. VanVeen, 10 Richard Road, said
the road on which he abuts is not a part of the Tower
Estates but is still a part under consideration at
the hearing. He asked what it involved.
The Chairman stated that it has only recently come
to the attention of the Board that the fee in Richard
Road, Lexington Avenue and part of Locust, Churchill
Lane , and Cedarwood Terrace remained in the Tower
Estates . He said when the Town purchased the area in
the rear for a playground, it was sold by a trust .
The trust wants to dissolve and must get all the pro-
perty out of its hands . He said the Board felt it
was under some obligation to straighten this out and
accepting the roads is one way.
Mr. VanVeen said that part of the road does not
come under the Tower Estates .
The Chairman said it seemed to be wise to do the
entire section .
Mr. VanVeen said that streets are usually laid out
by petition. He said this is a paved street in good
condition and not being laid out by petition. He asked
if it was a matter of public convenience and necessity.
The Chairman explained that, in general, the policy
has been to accept streets upon petition by the abutters .
If there was a large number of streets , they had to be I
done on a high percentage of signatures . However, the
Board can lay out a street when it seems to be the wise
thing to do and in this instance , where most of the
street would be accepted, it seemed wise toaccept it all .
Mr. VanVeen asked if there was a 50% rebate when a
street goes through not for public convenience and neces-
sity, and the Chairman replied in the negative .
Mr. VanVeen wished to be registered in opposition .
Mr . Paul D. Holleman, 15 Richard Road, said he is
in the short area and has signatures of all but two
people stating their objection to the laying out of
Rich-rd Rodin the area now owned by the Tower Estates
from Follen Road to No . 18 Richard Road because they
spent 5700 in September to have the street constructed
to that they considered standard. He said they feel it
would cause undue hardship to pay another `500 to redo
something that has already been done .
The Chairman said the letter would be taken into
consideration.
Mr. VanVeen said he was also a corner abutter.
Mr. Carroll explained that in the case of a corner
lot where both lots are private ways, the abutter would
pay a full assessment . He said that when Robbins Road
)
comes in for acceptance , and the frontage on Robbins
is less, then MYr, VanVeen would not have to pay any-
thing, but if it is greater, he would pay the difference
Mr. Raymond M. Hainer, 19 Richard Road, said he
worked to get the street paved and wished to be recorded
as being in favor of nice streets, but he could not see
why it had to be done again.
Mr . VanVeen asked if he could have some of the
details .
Mr . Carroll explained that Richard Road would be
built 24 feet wide and he thought the present width
was less than that. He said drainage would be included
and the estimated betterment would be $310 a foot .
Mr. VanVeen asked how betterments were assessed and
Mr. Carroll explained that they are payable over periods
of five , ten or fifteen years at 4%, at the option of
the property owner.
No one else wished to speak in favor or in opposition
and the hearing on Richard Road was declared closed .
Hearing was declared open on Locust Avenue from
Follen Road a distance of 635 feet, more or less, easterly.
Mr . Alden V. Johnson said that he owns property on
Buckman Drive andasked how this would affect him. Locust Ave .
Mr. Carroll explained th= t he had received a notice
in error .
No one wished to speak in favor or in opposition and
the hearing on Locust Avenue was declared closed.
Hearing was declared open on the alteration and re-
location of Lincoln Street from Worthen Road a distance
of 300 feet, more or less, westrly. Lincoln St .
No one wished to speak in favor or in opposition
and the hearing on the alteration and relocation of
Lincoln Street was declared closed.
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M.
A true record, Attest:
i
',Executive- Clerk, Selectmen