HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-03-06-SC-min Page 23
March 6, 1979
A meeting of the Lexington School Committee was held on March 6,
1979, at 9:00 p.m. , House F, Lexington High School. Those in atten-
dance were: Brown, Michelman, Swanson, Shaw, Gaudet. Also present
were: Lawson, Maclnnes, Pierson, DiGiammarino, Monderer, Barnes
The meeting was called to order by the Superintendent of Schools. CALL TO ORDER
He congratulated Mrs. Sandra Shaw, new member of the School Com-
mittee, and Mrs. Swanson and Mr. Michelman, who were re-elected.
The Superintendent called for nominations for Chairman of the SCHOOL COMMITTEE
School Committee. Mrs. Swanson nominated Mr. Otis Brown. Her motion OFFICERS
was seconded by Mr. Gaudet. There being no other nominations, nomin-
ations were closed. Mr. Brown was elected Chairman of the School Com-
mittee.
The Superintendent called for nominations for Secretary of the
School Committee. Mrs. Gaudet nominated Mrs. Swanson. Mrs. Shaw
seconded the motion. There being no other nominations, Mrs. Swanson
was elected Secretary of the School Committee.
Mr. Brown, on behalf of the School Committee, stated that he had ENERGY AUDIT
been impressed by the report given by the Tenneco Corporation prior
to the evening's School Committee meeting which was attended by School
Committee members, administrators, and interested citizens. He said
he looked forward to a review of the report and implementation of
items that would indicate to the Town the commitment of the adminis-
tration and School to energy saving.
Mrs. Swanson stated that she felt her re-election supported the PUBLIC
direction of the school system and School Committee, and was based PARTICIPATION
upon happiness with the direction and the support the staff had given
to the goals and priorities of the School Committee.
It was
MINUTES
VOTED: to accept the minutes of January 16, 1979, as presented. 1/16/79
(Michelman, Swanson, Unanimous)
It was
MINUTES
VOTED: to accept the minutes of January 27, 1979, as corrected. 1/27/79
(Swanson, Gaudet, Unanimous)
It was
MINUTES
VOTED: to accept the minutes of February 6, 1979, as presented. 2/6/70
(Brown, Swanson, Unanimous)
It was
MINUTES
VOTED: to accept the minutes of February 8, 1979, as corrected. 2/8/79
(Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous)
It was
Page 24
March 6, 1979
EXECUTIVE
VOTED: to accept the executive session minutes of January 16, 1979, SESSION
as presented. (Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous) MINUTES
1/16/79
It was
EXECUTIVE
VOTED: to accept the executive session minutes of February 6, 1979, SESSION
as presented. (Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous) MINUTES
2/6/79
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was
VOTED: to accept the following schedule of payments: (Swanson, Michel- SCHEDULE OF
man, Unanimous) (See attached sheet. ) PAYMENTS
The financial statement for February was presented to the School FINANCIAL
Committee. STATEMENT
A request from the Lexington Chapter of the AARP, the Lexington REQUEST-COUNCIL
Council on Aging, the Citizens Committee for Lexington Public Schools, ON AGING
and the Lexington Forum on Agingthat an amount of $800 be added to the
Continuing Education Program for adult, daytime classes was received.
The Superintendent noted that at the School Committee' s direction
he had been meeting this past year with Mr. Page and other representa-
tives. As a result of a simulated town meeting among the retired citi-
zens, one of the recommendations included offering via adult education,
a variety of courses. In this particular recommendation, they suggested
that a course of Family History be offered. The Superintendent suggested
that rather than request a separate budget item, he felt that $800 would
be available from the school budget.
Mr. Michelman said he interpreted the council's request was not one
of asking for school space but course offerings, and that perhaps between
one and three places were being considered. The Superintendent said that
several places were being considered for course offerings between 1:00 and
3:00 p.m. on Thursday afternoons. Mrs. Gaudet asked if there were any fu-
ture plans for the course offerings. The Superintendent responded that the
council was seeking a level of interest at the moment, and was not sure un-
til participation for its first offering was known.
Mrs. Shaw said she supported the proposition, and was vitally inter-
ested in providing this kind of service to such groups and thought the
Family History course was one that was relatively easy to start with, since
it had been successful in other communities. Mr. Brown added his support
and noted that he was pleased that the present system could absorb the cost
without additional budget request.
It was
VOTED: that the School Committee authorize the Superintendent and encourage
him to provide, in consultation with the Lexington Chapter of the
AARP, the Lexington Council on Aging, the Citizens Committee for Lex-
ington Public Schools, and the Lexington Forum on Aging, a course in
Family History at the approximate scale in terms outlined in Mr. Page's
letter. (Michelman, Shaw, Unanimous)
Page 25
March 6, 1979
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was
PERSONNEL
VOTED: to accept the following personnel changes (professional) : CHANGES -
(Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous) (See attached sheet.) PROFESSIONAL
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was
PERSONNEL
VOTED: to accept the following personnel changes (classified) : CHANGES -
(Swanson, Michelman, Unanimous) (See attached sheet.) CLASSIFIED
Upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was
SUBSTITUTE
VOTED: that the substitute nurses pay rate be increased from $18 per NURSES
day to $22 per day, effective April 1, 1979. (Swanson, Shaw, PAY
Unanimous)
Mr. Barnes presented the recommended programmers' sa.lary guide, and PROGRAMMERS'
noted that in the past, programmers had been placed on the salary guide SALARY GUIDE
of custodians. He said the new programmers salary guide was being recom-
mended with the understanding that all overtime wages for reasonable work
would cease.
Upon the recuumiendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was
VOTED: to accept the following salary guide for programmers: (Swanson,
Shaw, Unanimous) (See attached sheet.)
Upon the reconmiendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was BIDS -
ROPES COURSE
VOTED: to accept the following bid for the installation of ropes course
at the Lexington High School, and that it be awarded to Gymna-
sium Design Company. (Michelman, Swanson, Unanimous)
BIDS - ROPES COURSE
On February 16, 1979, requests for bids for the construction and
equipping of a ropes course were sent to two companies. The bid was
also advertised in the February 22, 1979, issue of the Lexington Minute-
Man.
The specifications described the methods and materials to be used
for the construction of thirteen (13) different challenge stations. In
addition, the site is to be cleared of brush, dead limbs, and other de-
bris. All brush and limbs are to be chipped and spread under the challenge
stations. At the completion of the installation of the course, the vendor
is to conduct a workshop for the staff. The course is to be constructed on
the hill behind the Field House at the Senior High School.
Only one bid was received and opened at a public reading at 12:00 noon
on Tuesday, February 27, 1979. The bid was from Gymnasium Design Company
in the amount of $4,797.
The funding for this project is provided as part of a grant "Project
Discover" PL 94-142. The budget for this portion of the project is $5,500.
Page 26
March 6, 1979
The remaining funds will be used to purchase small equipment to be used
in the project.
Gymnasium Design Company is fully qualified to construct the course
and meets all other requirements of this bid.
Upon the recunudendation of the Superintendent of Schools, it was PSYCHOTHERAPY
EXCEPTION
VOTED: to accept the following psychotherapy exception provider. (Michel- PROVIDER
man, Gaudet, Unanimous) (See attached sheet.)
The Superintendent of Schools introduced the Lexington/Boston Univer- BOSTON
sity Cluster Program. He said that historically vouchers had been given UNIVERSITY
to systems for the service of training student teachers from the univer- CLUSTER
sities. In 1977, the Boston University leadership, in cooperation with PROGRAM
several Lexington residents (Boston University employees) presented a
new educational system for providing support for all types as follows: °
1. Student teachers
2. Grants to schools in exchange for services provided student
teachers (This would replace vouchers.)
3. Talents of university staff via in-service courses
4. Access to university programs and services
He noted that over the past two years, Lexington Public Schools had
received nearly $20,000 in services. At this point, he introduced Dr. Ger-
ald Abegg, Boston University professor and Cluster coordinator; and Kay
Dillmore, staff member at Munroe School, main contact for allocations com-
mittee in Lexington.
Dr. Abegg noted that the Cluster Progiuuu sought to illuminate and en-
hance the educational quality for all cooperating parties, and allow the
local school system to enjoy a collaborative relationship with the School
of Education at Boston University. It also encouraged metropolitan sharing
of educational resources between clusters and the school education, and ex-
plored more functional ways of optimizing the professional capabilities ,and
resources of the University. He noted that a steering committee which con-
sisted of representatives from the five cluster schools in Lexington (Adams,
Bowman, Munroe, Muzzey, Lexington High School) , the school administration, and
two consortium council representatives had been established. The committee
met several times during the year, and developed operating guidelines and
policy for cluster activities.
He stated that funds allocated by the committee focused on the five
voluntary cluster schools in the Town of Lexington. Priority was given to
proposals submitted by staff members from each of Lexington's cluster schools.
If funds remained after consideration of the cluster school' s requests, pro-
posals from non-cluster schools in systems where programs existed would be
considered. He reviewed the criteria for the use of funds. Since the screen-
ing of proposals for funds allocated to Lexington was the major activity not
covered by existing policies and operations, it was decided to eatablish a
Page 27
March 6, 1979
Cluster Allocations Committee and charge it with the responsibility of man-
aging the funds.
He added that each of the five schools identified in the cluster shall
designate two voting members (princi al and a teacher) to participatein the
screening and voting on allocations for Lexington. The Boston University
Coordinator for Lexington had one vote, and a majority of eleven votes were
required to approve requests.
He then reviewed responsibilities of committee members and the types
of programs that had been funded. Lexington's involvement in the programs
had amounted to nearly $20,000 in grants in the past two years.
The School Committee expressed its thanks to Dr. Abegg and Miss Dill-
more for their support and for their dedicated service to the Cluster Pro-
grams.
The Superintendent of Schools noted that in a letter from the Massach- ART
usetts Association of School Committees, Inc. , Mr. Norman B. Raum and Mr. AWARDS
Jack Zichitella, faculty members of the Visual Arts Education Department
of Lexington High School, had been requested to place art work of two of
their students, Alex Tsui and Mary Haus, to represent the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts in the State art collections in the offices of the National
School Boards Association and the U.S. Office of Education in Washington,
D.C.
The School Committee expressed its pleasure with the honor and con-
gratulated the students and staff members for their outstanding achieve-
ments.
Mr. Brown said that he and Dr. Lawson had been invited to meet with MEETING WITH
the Town Manager and Chairperson of the Board of Selectmen to discuss BOARD OF
budget implications in regards to "capping." He noted that they would SELECTMEN
meet on March 7 to get a sense of the "capping" attitude of both bodies.
Budget items would not be reviewed individually but would allow each group
to receive an indication of the procedure for town meetings.
Mrs. Swanson challenged the reason for the meeting since it seemed
that nothing could be discussed unless specific items were reviewed. She
hoped that it would not be that type of meeting. Mr. Brown indicated it
was not. He said it would be an exchange of directions for Town Meeting.
It was
VOTED: to adjourn at 10:11 p.m. (Michelman, Swanson, Unanimous)
RespectfullyAsubmitted,
--Richard H. Barnes
Recording Secretary
fc
. 1
SC1?FOULE OF ?AY 2iNTS
•
The following schedules of payments wen.• available bie for scrutiny and
approval prior to this meeting:
Personal Services
February 2, 1979 Classified Payao11s X17-C $76.294 'B---
February 16, 1979 1A8-C 77,108.30
February 9, 1979 Frafessinnal P.ayrells #LU 4°2,243.72
February 23, 1979 #17 452,934, 99
Expenses .
February 23, 1979 Bill Schedules #173 3,929.79
February 23, 1979 #179 3,169. 18
February 23, 1979 #180 5,726.06
February 23, 1979 #181 2,792.82
February 23, 1979 #182 18.11
March 2, 1979 #183 4,008.35
March 2, 1979 #184 2,395.05
March 2, 1979 #185 47,590.35
1-larch 2, 1979 e #186 78, 106.84
March 2, 1979 #187 94.00
March 2, 1979 0188 4,306.35
SPECIAL PROGRAMS - Non-Lexington Funds
Adult Education
February 9, 1979 Professional Payrolls 2, 128.62
February 23, 1979 439.65
February 9, 1979 Bill Schedules #5 138.97
March 2, 1979 #7 244,00
•
Driver Education
February 9, 1979 Profcsstan:al P.:°.t '' is 75.98
February 23, 1979 1 ,492,92 _
February 23, 1979 FAIL: Sci`s uu.:s. #h 5.52
March 2, 1979 #7 460.00
Metco Program
February 2, 1979 Classified Pe.ytolLs #11 -C 1,676.40
February 16, 1979 4112-C 1 ,674.30
February 9, 1979 Professional Payrolls 5,267.45
February 23, 1979 5,621.45
February 9, 1979 Bill Schedules #7 28, 152.49
March 2, 1979 #8 5,073.10
PL-94-142 Transition to Employment
February 2, 1979 Classified Payrolls #11-C 89.28
February 16, 1979 #12-C 89.28
(Over)
Transition to Employment (Cont°d)
February 9, 1979 Professional Payrolls $ 1,535.57
February 23, 1979 1,535.57
February 9, 1979 Bill Schedules #8 20,92
March 2, 1979 #9 236.50
PL89-313 Special Education
February 9, 1979 Professio a] Payrolls 4700,26
February 23, 1979 875.26
ESEA Library
February 23, 1979 Bill Schedules #5 1,150.03
March 2, 1979 #6 412.50
Pupil School Matr. Recovery
February 9, 1979 Bill Schedules #4 32.74
March 2, 1979 #5 248.60
Grants
February 9, 1979 Video Taping #3 1,465.06
March 2, 1979 #4 812.30
February 9, 1979 Food b Nutrition #3 123,87
March 2, 1979 Industrial Arts #2 346.31
PERSONNEL GRANGES (t ,_.:s; ,.rco)
Resigrstions Effective
Transfer Of Funds Effective
Effective
For Your Information Only
"
YF.F.Si7NNL i{:isGF: 4'!:): EE51pNr'\i.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
YES. IN LE;XINCFON EFFECTIVE REASON
RESIGNATION
)
RETIREMENT
(Over)
TO: Dr. Lawson
FROM: R. H. Barnes .
r/(i
SUBJECT: Programmers- Salary Cold:'
In the past computer ptmiu.a60Jors li. Lan nlac;d on the salary guide
of custodians. It is r-ecom nendod h'. Frank ILc i. h..arinn and me that a separate
salary guide be established.
A review of the wages of the present prugrnrmner indicates that it will
• result in a difference of only $66.00.
Budget Current Proposed
Salary Overtime Salary Overtime Placement
77/78 77/78 78/79 78/79 78/79 Difference
$14,747 $436 $15,484 $500 $16,050 $66
We recommend the following guide:
Step 1. $12,126
2. 12,780
3. 13 ,435
4. 14,089
5. 14,743
6. 15,397
._-..._.......__-.. .
16,050
8. 16, 705
9. 17 , 359
10. 18,013
-that all overture wat,es for reasonable work cease;
-that all programmers he placed on the above guide.
(This will enable Lexington to retain and/or attract
quality pers;'nne1 . ) •