HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-01-13-SC-min Page 6
January 13, 1979
The Lexington School Committee meeting was held on Saturday, Janua-
ry 13, 1979, at 9:00 a.m. , at the School Administration Building. Those
in attendance were: Brown, Swanson, Michelman, Hoffman, Gaudet. Also
present were: Lawson, Maclnnes, Monderer, Pierson, Barnes.
Dr. Lawson began the presentation of the 1979-80 Preliminary Budget 1979-80
and stated that the Lexington school budget for 1979-80 of $16,556,377 re- PRELIMINARY
flected the efforts of administrators and staff to provide an educational BUDGET
program of continued quality for approximately 6,400 students, and, at the
same time, responded to the opposing pressures of declining enrollment
(minus 502 students) and escalating costs (eight to nine per cent inflation
estimated for 1979) . He said the difference of $346,537 or a 2.1`7, in-
crease was divided between personnel services ($229,205 or 1.77,) and non-
personnel services ($117,332 or 4.87) . He added that this marked the fourth
consecutive year that the per cent of budget increase had decreased. He
said this was accomplished despite:
- a wage settlement for all employees
- mandated state programs
- uncontrollable cost increases in instructional materials, fuel,
transportation, and equipment
The initial budget request from staff of $17,026,108 (5.1% increase)
was reduced as a result of savings from:
- the decline in student enrollment (minus 502) resulting in pro-
fessional staff reductions of 19.57.
- The School Couuuittee decision to close Munroe School, effective
September, 1979.
- administrative efficiencies
- consolidation of positions and tasks
- increased effectiveness of program budget planning and
accounting
- more use of 3-5 year planning and purchasing
The Superintendent noted the budget was the result of a grass roots
effort involving all interested staff over a ten-month period. Needs had
been stated, reviewed, and expressed in terms of priorities. These priori-
ties had been related to specific programs and served as guidelines during
budget development. The 1979-80 budget request represented the best effort,
to date, to responsibly relate financial needs to educational outcomes dur-
ing difficult economic conditions. He said imagination, ingenuity, insight,
and understanding (the signs of a vibrant staff) will continue to be applied
to provide the best education possible for Lexington students.
He then outlined the assumptions and constraints of budget development.
ASSUMPTIONS
- Enrollment will continue to decline at all levels - K-6 = 11%,
7-9 = 47,, 10-12 = 5`7, (1977 census data) . The 1977 census in-
dicated an 18% decrease in number of children born during that
year.
Page 7
January 13, 1979
- Enrollment and Junior High districts will continue to
change reflecting the reassignment of students accord-
ing to the Report on the Committee to Reassign Pupils.
- Staffing ratios used during the 1977/78 and 1978/79
budget planning will continue to guide the staff in de-
veloping the 1979/80 budget.
CONSTRAINTS
- State aid will not significantly alter the cost of edu-
cation to local government.
- Class size reduction will be accomplished only through
different utilization of existing staffing ratios and
must be within LEA/LSC contract agreement.
- The digit inflation will continue and significantly raise
the cost of most learning materials.
- Energy prices will continue to increase the costs of the
Operation and Maintenance Programs.
- Negotiations (approximately one million dollar increase
because of 5.5 increase to groups)
He noted that the following priorities affected the budget:
Instruction Programs - Regular
Evaluate Elementary Social Studies and Language Arts
Programs.
Establish Spelling Program K-6
Evaluate Secondary Reading Program.
Implement recommendations of Grouping Study.
Instruction Programs - Special
Design an integrated Occupational Education Program 7-12.
Implement a Health Program K-12.
Assess reliability and validity of Kindergarten Screen-
ing Program.
Instruction Support - Improvement Services
Professional Training and Development - Improve the skills
of professional staff through more alternative approaches
to in-service education
Develop improved system of personnel support with emphasis
on improvement of instruction.
Page 8
January 13, 1979
General Support
Operation and Maintenance of Plant - Respond to recom-
mendations of Energy Conservation Task Force.
Respond to NEASC study of Lexington High School.
Following the Superintendent's remarks, Mr. Michelman stated that he
felt the budget was very responsive to the general guidelines of the School
Committee. He then asked the Superintendent whether he anticipated any State
fiscal control in the near future. Dr. Lawson responded that there was a def-
inite possibility of capping on school or municipal spending. He said it was
incumbent upon School Committees to be vigilant to the possibility that some
type of constraints upon schools may occur. He noted that if this did occur,
he would talk with the management team and ask them for recommendations as to
where it would be possible to cull out expenditures. Mrs. Gaudet asked the
Superintendent when this constraint might occur with School Committee budgets.
The Superintendent responded that his information would indicate that July 1,
1979, would be the date. Mr. Brown said that on Tuesday, January 16, the School
Committee would meet with the Selectmen at 7:30 p.m. , in the Selectmen's Office
and discuss the State fiscal situation with Representative Lincoln Cole and
Senator Samuel Rotondi. He said that he hoped that at that time he would have
a better indication as to the feeling of the State.
A school information packet pertaining to the 79/80 preliminary budget PRELIMINARY
was presented to the School Committee. It noted that the increase in bud- BUDGET
get was 2.1% with the Munroe School closed. The 78/79 budget of $16,209,840 INFORMATION
reflected a difference and increase of 2.1% of $346,537 for a sum total of PACKET.
$16,556,377. The School Committee then reviewed the individual pages of the
preliminary budget. The Superintendent reviewed the 79/80 Personnel Services
Budget request which indicated a difference and increase of 1.7`. or $229,815.
It was noted that the major part of this Personnel Services increase was
$204,428 due to the following reasons :
Negotiations (Adjustment 5.5() +719,175
Increments +275,787
Staff Changes
Reductions - Professional -320,854
Reductions - Classified - 71,946
Munroe Closing -126,100
Changes in Staff (ins/outs) -271,634
Additional increases of $24,777 were attributed to items as: early
retirement, stipends, and severance pay.
The School Committee then reviewed the professional staff reductions
which amounted to (with Munroe School closed) 25.15 professional staff mem-
bers and 10.527 classified staff members. Classroom teachers accounted for
16.58 of this total. The School Committee then reviewed the individual staff
reductions and increases . Mr. Spiris indicated that he had some discomfort
in the area of specialists due to the fact that it was necessary to have prop-
er time to go from one school to another. Also, this year' s budget reflected
a reduction in specialists due to concern with equity which had been done in
the past two to three years in categories such as librarians. Mr. Michelman
asked Mr. Spiris if it were possible to prepare an alternative recommendation
that might relieve some of his discomfort. Mr. Spiris responded in the af-
Page 9
January 13, 1979
firmative. Mrs. Swanson said since these were only planning figures, and
the School Committee was always concerned with equity, that if there were
problems in September, they could easily be solved with the addition of
staff as has been in the past. Mr. Brown said that this had always been
the posture of the School Committee and it was the consensus of the Couuuit-
tee to continue in this manner.
It was
VOTED: to adjourn at 10:15 a.m. {Michelman, Gaudet, Unanimous)
Respectfully submitted,
Richard H. Barnes
Recording Secretary
/c